1 / 18

Department of Archaeology

Identifying Palaeolithic potential: Desk-based Assessment & Deposit-centred Approach. Francis Wenban-Smith. Heritage in Practice CPD course Birkbeck , University of London 15 th September 2017. CAHO-Contracting Palaeolithic pre-construction archaeology. Department of Archaeology.

friedman
Download Presentation

Department of Archaeology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Identifying Palaeolithic potential: Desk-based Assessment & Deposit-centred Approach Francis Wenban-Smith Heritage in Practice CPD course Birkbeck, University of London 15th September 2017 CAHO-Contracting Palaeolithic pre-construction archaeology Department of Archaeology

  2. CAHO- Contracting Introduction • Desk-based assessment • Deposit-centred Approach • Methods: deposits • Methods: Pal remains • Deposit types and interpretations • Case-study 1 - DBA worked example

  3. CAHO- Contracting Desk-based assessment • Identify potential presence of important Palaeolithic remains • Pleistocene deposits • Presence, distribution and types • Establish known/potential presence of Pal remains

  4. Deposit-centred Approach: a - the wider picture CAHO- Contracting • Geological mapping • Solid geology • Drift geology • Topography • Previous Palaeolithic finds: - HER - SRPP, ERPP

  5. Deposit-centred Approach: b - PCAs, the closer, site-specific picture CAHO- Contracting • Landscape situation • Mapped deposits • Extrapolated deposits • Known finds • Extrapolated finds • Palaeolithic Character Areas - PCAs * - map + attribute table - deposit character - Palaeolithic remains - potential

  6. Methods: - deposits CAHO- Contracting • Identify the range of Pleistocene deposit types • Consider their formation processes • Consider their distribution and likely extrapolation • Consider their presence/extrapolation in the specific site area

  7. Methods: - Palaeolithic remains CAHO- Contracting • HER • SRPP/ERPP • Identify their association with deposits • Consider their integrity and disturbance

  8. Deposits: 1 - geological mapping CAHO- Contracting Drift Solid

  9. Deposits: 2 - Simple Pleistocene groupings, Wymer CAHO- Contracting • Wymer 1995 - The contexts of palaeoliths * • SERF - South-East Research Framework

  10. Deposits: 2 - Simple Pleistocene groupings, SERF CAHO- Contracting • Wymer 1995 - The contexts of palaeoliths * • SERF - South-East Research Framework • Other Research Frameworks are available..

  11. Deposits: 3 - Simple Pleistocene groupings, SERF CAHO- Contracting • Wymer 1995 - The contexts of palaeoliths * • SERF - South-East Research Framework • Other Research Frameworks are available.. SERF Lower/Middle Palaeolithic Resource Assessment: principal Pleistocene deposit groups

  12. Deposits: SERF 1a - Anglian/pre-Anglian terrace/plateau deposits CAHO- Contracting • landscape situation • presumed fluvial, high energy? • reasonably constrained dating (if can be established) • old! so re-working not an issue • key Pal Q: residual, or contained

  13. Deposits: SERF 1b - post-Anglian terrace deposits - not “gravels” CAHO- Contracting • coarse-grained, fine-grained • high energy deposition, low energy deposition • can contain hiatuses, palaeo-landsurfaces • sites/concentrations, not just gen homogenous mix • reasonably constrained dating (if can be established) • major potential wrt research frameworks

  14. Deposits: SERF 2 - Residual, Clay-with-flints CAHO- Contracting • residual, palimpsest • no dating constraint • limited potential wrt research framework

  15. Deposits: SERF 3 - Coombe/Head deposits CAHO- Contracting • generally low potential • occasionally high importance • can gently bury undisturbed material: Red Barns, Ebbsfleet Green

  16. Deposits: SERF 4 - Aeolian/loessic silt, plateau brickearth CAHO- Contracting • defined by landscape situation and sediment • gentle deposition, no disturbance • prone to landscape mobility, slopewash • contrast between English and N France records - why? • an unrecognised resource?

  17. Deposits: SERF 5 - Marine littoral (raised beach, intertidal/estuarine) CAHO- Contracting • limited occurrence • varies from high energy and very disturbed.. • .. to totally undisturbed: one afternoon • Boxgrove horse butchery site • “Brickearth”??

  18. CAHO- Contracting Worked example: M25 junction 2 improvement • Real-world example • Demonstrate general approaches • Prelude to second case study, done as group work

More Related