1 / 20

Bias & Change in Urban & Metropolitan Politics: USA

Bias & Change in Urban & Metropolitan Politics: USA. The Bias of Political Organization. Urban political structures not neutral Examples: Ethnic leaders viewed civil service reforms as “the curse of the nation” Metropolitan governments opposed by African-American leaders

Download Presentation

Bias & Change in Urban & Metropolitan Politics: USA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bias & Change in Urban & Metropolitan Politics: USA

  2. The Bias of Political Organization • Urban political structures not neutral • Examples: • Ethnic leaders viewed civil service reforms as “the curse of the nation” • Metropolitan governments opposed by African-American leaders • Bussing in school districts opposed by ethnics and suburban whites

  3. The Bias of Political Organization • Zoning regulations often used to exclude poor

  4. Common Themes of Urban Politics in the United States • First Theme • Participants in the political process anticipate that major changes in: • governmental structures, • boundaries, • decision making processes • Produce policy changes that would be for or against their interests

  5. Common Themes of Urban Politics in the United States • Second Theme • Most important urban political issues now involve more than the central cities • suburbs & the exurbs • metropolitan-level structures of government • federal government • Contemporary politics of the central city and the entire metropolitan region are intertwined, not separate

  6. Common Themes of Urban Politics in the United States • Third Theme • Key issues at stake involved changes in either • channels through which citizens would have political access to key decision matters • Or direct social access to important amenities of urban life • Examples: • quality education • housing • transportation

  7. Common Themes of Urban Politics in the United States • Fourth Theme • Federal government has become a key participant in urban and metropolitan politics • Washington influences decisions on housing, education and intra-urban transportation • Above issues previously were viewed as exclusively local prerogatives

  8. The Nature of Change in Metropolitan Politics: Latin America • Abrupt change imposed from above (the national level) • Change in rules of the game – as opposed to change in government • Fidel Castro’s abolition of the mayor-council system (modeled on the US.) of government for Havana • Reorganization in Buenos Aires following the constitutional reform of 1994 • Creation of the Metropolitan District in Caracas upon adoption of a new constitution (1999)

  9. The Nature of Change in Metropolitan Politics of the United States • Incrementalism has predominated • Three historical periods of urban/metropolitan politics • Age of political machines • Progressive movement • Period of the dependent city

  10. Two Watershed Presidencies(post World War II) • Lyndon B. Johnson (1963-69): bringing the federal government in (Great Society) • Ronald W. Reagan (1981-89) distancing the federal government from the cities

  11. Contemporary Local Government Fragmentation (Counties)

  12. Contemporary Local Government Fragmentation (Municipalities of Allegheny County – PA.

  13. Contemporary Local Government Fragmentation (U.S. Total 87,453) • Other Regular Subdivisions • Town/Township • School District

  14. Contemporary Local Government Fragmentation (U.S. Total 87,453) • Special District • Tri-State Port Authority • Services Metropolitan New York (N.Y.; N. New Jersey; W. Connecticut)

  15. Bias, Change, and Political Power: Critical Conceptual Clarifications • Political Power: the ability to influence public decisions • Critical Dimensions of political power • Context of Power • Structure of Power • Public Power and Private power

  16. Tradition of Privatism in Urban United States • Quaker Philadelphia & Puritan Boston • Priority on individual and private sector • Priority to the leadership in the public sector • Sam Warner: The Private City (Philadelphia

  17. Changing Emphasis:Private vs Public Sectors • Priority to private sector following the Civil War • Wealth increasingly concentrated in 1890’s • Wilson administration (1913 – 1920) • Role of government increased • Heavy handed national security policies leads to election of conservative Republican Warren G. Harding • Social and economic Darwinism Ascendant in 1920’s

  18. Punctuated Expansion of Role of Federal Government • New Deal of Franklin D. Roosevelt • Great Society of Lyndon Johnson • Reagan Revolution resurrects support for smaller government • Government problem – not solution • Bush I and Clinton continue the policies • More leeway to capitalist institutions under George W. Bush • Differential Impacts of Privatization • Affluent • Less fortunate

  19. Barak Obama • Concern with the negative consequences of Bush administration’s reliance on private sector • Affinity for plight of underclass in the cities • Greater confidence in the capabilities of government

More Related