slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
A Framework for a Fully Automatic Karyotyping System PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
A Framework for a Fully Automatic Karyotyping System

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 1

A Framework for a Fully Automatic Karyotyping System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 139 Views
  • Uploaded on

A Framework for a Fully Automatic Karyotyping System. E. Poletti, E. Grisan, A. Ruggeri Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Italy. Introduction.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'A Framework for a Fully Automatic Karyotyping System' - zarek


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

A Framework for a Fully Automatic Karyotyping System

E. Poletti, E. Grisan, A. Ruggeri

Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Italy

Introduction

  • Karyotype analysis is a widespread procedure in cytogenetics to assess the possible presence of genetics defects. The procedure is lengthy and repetitive, so that an automatic analysis would greatly help the cytogenetist routine work.
  • Still, automatic segmentation and classification of chromosomes are open issues: existing commercial software packages are far from being fully automatic and their poor performances require human intervention to correct challenging situations. We propose a framework for a fully automatic karyotyping procedure.
  • The segmentation is carried out by means of a space variant thresholding scheme, which proved to be successful even in presence of hyper- or hypo-fluorescent regions in the image. Then a greedy approach is used to identify and resolve touching and overlapping chromosomes, based on geometric evidence and image information.
  • The classification step is coupled with a sequence of modules conceived to cope with routine images in which chromosomes are randomly rotated, possibly blurred or corrupted by overlapping or by dye stains.

Methods: Segmentation

A cluster is selected for analysis

An axis is extracted andthe SCM is evaluated

Single chromosome?

Original input image

Pop first cluster

and evaluate the SCM

Y

Push clustersinto the queue

Save singlechromosome

N

Identify newclusters

  • Single Chromosome Measure (SCM)
    • morphological dilation of the axis with a disk
    • evaluation of the ratio of the obtained area with that of the original blob.

space variant thresholding:cluster identification

Dark paths

The quasi-contact area along adjacent chromosomes.

Geometric analysis and Disentanglement

Resolution of the cluster used as example

Concave points identification

OverlapsEach two of lines connecting disjoint pairs of minima points in K are considered.

Concave points as cues

The local minima of the curvature of the contour (K) are the points suggesting the possible presence of touching and overlaps.

Geometrical cuts

Candidate cut lines links two points in K and lies entirely inside the cluster.

  • Space variant threshold
    • divide the image into a tessellation of squares
    • evaluate the Otsu threshold for each square separately
    • elimination of small, spurious segmented blobs
    • identification of nuclei present in the image

Concave points are here identified and used as cues for cuts and overlaps

Curvature along the contour

Classification

  • Feature pre-processing
    • different zoom
    • different illumination conditions
    • chromosomes belonging to slightly different stages of the prometaphase
    • standardization needed.
  • Polarization
  • Chromosomes are randomly rotated.
  • We need to comply with:
    • an uniformed array feature orderliness
    • the orientation standard adopted
    • Boosted alternating decision tree:
  • Features extraction
  • The axis estimation is carried out by a robust modified version of a vessel-tracking algorithm.
  • Three features are derived from the axis:
    • length
    • density profile (64 samples)
    • contour function (64 samples)

Two other geometrical features considered are:

    • perimeter
    • area
  • Classification via Neural Network
    • 3-layerANN
    • 131, 131, and 24 nodes respectively.
    • activation functions: log-sigmoid.
    • training algorithm: scaled conjugate gradient
    • training set: 50 karyotypes
    • validation set: 20 karyotypes
    • testing set::49 karyotypes

Class Reassigning Algorithm

The human karyotype contains 22 pairs of autosomal chromosomes and 1 pair of sex chromosomes  constrained classification problem.

  • Linear Programming algorithm:
    • rearranges the classifier output
    • satisfy the above constraints
    • maximize the accuracy.

Decision node: specify a predicate condition based on a feature.

Prediction node: specify a value to add to the polarization score.

Axis calculation for the feature extraction

Length distribution for every class,previous (up) and after (down) rescaling

Results and Discussion

The performance of the proposed methods are better or comparable to the best of other methods reported in the literature, providing a tool able to automatically analyze an image, and whose results can be handed over wit minimal human intervention to a classifier for automatic karyotyping.

119 cells containing a total of 5474 chromosomes was analyzed to test the segmentation algorithm. 50 of these cells have been used to train the classifier, 20 to validate the training and 50 to test the classification step.

We have presented an algorithm able to automatically identify chromosomes in metaphase images, taking care of a first segmentation step and then of the disentanglement of chromosome clusters by resolving separately adjacencies and overlaps with a greedy approach, that ensures that at each step only the best split of a blob is performed. The automatic classification step is able to deal with routine images in which chromosomes are randomly rotated, blurred, corrupted by overlapping or by dye stains.

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially funded by TesiImaging S.r.l., Milan, Italy

Correspondence

Enea Poletti, University of Padova - Dept. of Information Engineering

Via G. Gradenigo 6/a - 35131 Padova - ITALY   e-mail: enea.poletti@dei.unipd.it