1 / 26

Social Exclusion’ Project on Foreign Prisoners in European Penitentiary Institutions

Social Exclusion’ Project on Foreign Prisoners in European Penitentiary Institutions Prof. Dr. Anton M. Van Kalmthout TILBURG UNIVERSITY 2011. Preliminary remarks. Conclusions/recommendations are based on: 25 country reports

Download Presentation

Social Exclusion’ Project on Foreign Prisoners in European Penitentiary Institutions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Social Exclusion’ Project on Foreign Prisoners in European Penitentiary Institutions Prof. Dr. Anton M. Van Kalmthout TILBURG UNIVERSITY 2011

  2. Preliminary remarks Conclusions/recommendations are based on: • 25 country reports • Reports of the organizations: Aire Centre/ CEP/Foreign Liaison Office/ICPS/JRS Europe and Prisoners Abroad • Reports of the CPT • Interviews with foreign prisoners

  3. Preliminary remarks (II) • The term ‘Prisoner’ includes the following groups of detained foreigners: • Foreign prisoners detained under criminal law, who are to be removed to their home countries; • Foreign prisoners, who after release will remain in the host country; • Foreigners in administrative detention

  4. Preliminary remarks (III) Main topics of the research project: • Sentencing and prison system • Treatment of foreign prisoners • Administrative detention of foreign prisoners • Foreign Nationals detained abroad

  5. Sentencing/Prison system Foreign prisoners are overrepresented in pre-trial institutions and prisons • Half a million prisoners in Europe, 19.1% foreigners; • The numbers vary greatly per European country; • Proportion of more than 50% (Luxembourg), 40% (Austria, Belgium, Estonia and Greece), or 30% (Italy, Malta and the Netherlands)

  6. Sentencing and prison system (II) Reasons: • Higher probability of detection and apprehension; • Excluded from alternatives to pre-trial detention; • Excluded from non-custodial sanctions; • Strict requirements for conditional release;

  7. Sentencing and prison system (III) • Transfer of prisoners rarely applied; • Enforcement of expulsion orders; 7. Increase of prison sentences for violation of Immigration Laws

  8. Treatment The main problems foreign prisoners are confronted with: • Lack of language knowledge, leading to: • Mistrust/fear/incomprehension/isolation; • Exclusion from educational/rehabilitative activities; • Less opportunities for resettlement programmes

  9. Treatment (II) 2. Language problems are growing worse, because in many countries: • Written information on rights, prison rules and legal system in different languages is lacking; • Access to interpreters is lacking; • Access to TV-channels and other media in foreigners’ language is restricted or not allowed

  10. Treatment (III) 3. Foreign prisoners are in many countries excluded from: • Prison leaves; • Outdoor prison programmes; • Work in prison; • Support/assistance by Probation/After Care Service

  11. Treatment (IV) Other shortcomings which can be observed concern: • Inadequate or even lack of (free) legal aid; • Medical/Psychiatric care; • Quality of prison staff; • Visit-opportunities • Foreigners often ill-treated

  12. Administrative detention Main problems which have been observed: • Places of detention differ from special detention centres, police cells to prisons; • Im(material) conditions often worse than in ordinary prisons: • Overcrowding • Legal aid/medical care/unqualified staff • Hygiene/contact outside world/information • Religious-cultural requirements are not always respected

  13. Administrative detention (II) • Treated as criminals, even worse; • Unclear legal position, dependent on the place of detention and responsible Department; • Lack of external controlling mechanisms; • Inadequate possibilities for judicial review; • Uncertainty about length of detention; • Uncertainty about future, especially when removal cannot be realised; • Special attention has to be given to children

  14. Foreign nationals detained abroad Main problems concern: • Assistance (legal, financial, personal) by Embassy and Consulate (if any); 2. Transfer to home country; 3. Assistance to families (legal, financial, material/immaterial); 4. Preparation to resettlement

  15. FOCUS POINTS FOR NPM’s (1) Rehabilitation/re-integration is a principal aim for all prisoners. The necessity to provide rehabilitative programmes is laid down in the European Prison Rules which provide rehabilitation as the sole aim of deprivation of liberty for sentenced prisoners (see No. 102.1 European Prison Rules)

  16. (2) Foreign prisoners often do not receive sufficient (written) information about their legal rights and duties in a language they understand. Staff in prisons and immigration detention centres should be particularly educated to address the specific needs and language deficits of foreign detainees. In many countries racism amongst prisoners is a concrete problems that should get more concern by the prison and detention authorities

  17. (3) Overcrowding is a severe problem in many prisons but also administrative detention centres. (4) Prison authorities should be aware that allocating prisoners of the same national/cultural/religious background can be seen as a ‘good practice’ as it can elevate the feeling of isolation, it can also create undesirable hierarchical or violent subcultures.

  18. (5) Foreign prisoners should be lodged in penitentiary institutions located in the capital city in order to facilitate regular contact with diplomatic missions and relatively easy transportation from the airport when relatives from abroad pay a visit.

  19. (6) Admission to penitentiary institutions can be seen as an intimidating and dehumanising experience. It is therefore essential that prisoners have a proper understanding of what is actually happening and prison authorities should therefore have information available in various languages. Further prison authorities should at least translate prison rules and house rules in several most common foreign languages and should ensure that they are presented to foreign prisoners upon admission

  20. (7) Prison authorities should take into consideration that foreign prisoners often have to make long distance calls and sometimes at odd hours, due to different time zones, in order to notify their families about their detention

  21. (8) Being engaged in useful and paid work is essential for prisoners and especially for foreign prisoners because they often do not receive financial support from outside the institution. Prison authorities should ensure that foreign prisoners have equal access to work, education and training programmes. Providing classes for foreigners to become more acquainted with the national language or English could be beneficial for both prisoners and staff.

  22. (9) Prison authorities should make sure that representatives of the most common religions have regular access to foreign prisoners for individual meetings and to hold religious meetings. (10) Prison authorities should provide medical care free of charge to all prisoners, so also to foreign prisoners that might not have health insurance

  23. (11) Prison authorities should provide (free) legal assistance to foreign prisoners. (12) Prison authorities should allow foreign prisoners more flexible visiting schemes in order to allow family and relatives to make the long trip worthwhile. Further prison authorities should allow foreign prisoners to make telephone calls at different hours in relation to different time zones.

  24. (13) Prison authorities should acknowledge that re-integration activities and prison leave for foreign prisoners are as important as for other prisoners. Social welfare organisations can play a role in the resettlement of foreign prisoners. An example is Spain where some non-governmental organisations provide secure shelters and dormitories in order to make prison leave possible for foreign prisoners

  25. (14) The place and conditions of detention as well as the detention regime should reflect the basic difference that exists between the sanctions and measures of detention that are applied within the criminal justice system and the system of administrative detention that is applied to irregular migrants. Irregular migrants should not be transferred to prisons as a punitive measure unless they are suspect or have been convicted of a criminal offence. As far as possible, an ‘open regime’ should be maintained within the institution.

  26. (15) Nationals that have been detained abroad should receive access to national aftercare and probation provisions upon return in the home country. Providing practical assistance to nationals detained abroad directly after return, like how to obtain official documents, how to apply for housing, a job, social benefits etc is essential to combat recidivism.

More Related