1 / 10

Use of modified cornstarch in patients affected by GSD I: an observational in-patient study

International meeting glycogen storage diseases associations 2-3 October, Milan. Use of modified cornstarch in patients affected by GSD I: an observational in-patient study. Ilaria Giulini Neri Department of Pediatrics San Paolo Hospital University of Milan. Patients and methods.

wiley
Download Presentation

Use of modified cornstarch in patients affected by GSD I: an observational in-patient study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. International meeting glycogen storage diseases associations 2-3 October, Milan Use of modified cornstarch in patients affected by GSD I: an observational in-patient study Ilaria Giulini Neri Department of Pediatrics San Paolo Hospital University of Milan

  2. Patients and methods • 6 patients with GSD I (1 Ia and 5 Ib) were recruited from our Metabolic Unit and the challenge with modified cornstarch was proposed. • The diagnosis of GSD I was based on a liver biopsy showing reduced activity of the appropriate enzyme or on a mutation in the appropriate gene.

  3. Patients and methods • The study was a consecutive, 48 hours, in-patient stay at San Paolo Hospital. Patients continued their usual diet, keeping their same time meals as at home. • Glucose and lactate were measured at pre-prandial time (5 or 6 times a day). • The usual starch (UCCS) was administered on the first 24 hours, the alternative (MC) on second day of the study. We decided, for safety reasons, to administer the same dose of MC as dose of UCCS provided in each patient diet. • We collected patient’s feelings (about taste, texture, digestibility) and signs or symptoms (like meteorism, swelling sensation, diarrhea).

  4. Results and discussion • We performed a statistical analysis using Wilcoxon test: we confronted mean levels of glucose and lactate using UCCS and MC, in each time of their 24-hours profile. • There was no statistically significant difference. • We calculated also the variability of glucose and lactate levels in the whole cohort, with UCCS and MC: there was no statistically significant difference in using MC

  5. Results and discussion Feelings and symptoms

  6. C.S. 120 100 80 UCCS 60 MC 40 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Results and discussion No difference

  7. C.A. R.F. 100 120 100 80 80 60 UCCS UCCS 60 MC MC 40 40 20 20 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 • Small biochemical advantage • Bad texture and taste

  8. M.C. B.S. 140 140 120 120 100 100 80 80 UCCS UCCS 60 60 MC MC 40 40 20 20 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 No advantage

  9. B.F. 120 100 80 UCCS 60 MC 40 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Results and discussion • Despite the inconsistency of statistical analysis, MC maintained more constant levels of glucose and lactate compared to UCCS in one of our patient. • We tried the administration of MC for a longer period; we recommended the patient to continue measurements of glucose-meter before all meals also at home. • After 5 months we noted a clinical improvement: B.F. has less prominent abdomen, liver size and echogenicity (steatosis) are stable, and parents refer that the child is less hungry and that the glucose-meter values are more constant. • Laboratory analysis are stable after these first 5 months of treatment with MC (slight decrease of hepatic transaminases).

  10. Conclusions • We studied a small number of heterogeneous patients with large differences in age, type and severity of disease, who often require meticulous individualized management. • The newly created modified cornstarch could be a promising alternative to traditional cornstarch preparations. • Further studies are necessary to examine the role of this novel starch as part of the standard dietary regimen of larger numbers of patients for a greater period of time.

More Related