1 / 12

Ethical & Legal Issues for Schools of Nursing During SARS: Lessons for Pandemic Planning

Ethical & Legal Issues for Schools of Nursing During SARS: Lessons for Pandemic Planning. Betty Burcher, RN, MSc Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto CASN Council Breakfast: November 15, 2006. SARS & the Faculty of Nursing. Extraordinary impact on Faculty of Nursing

whitney
Download Presentation

Ethical & Legal Issues for Schools of Nursing During SARS: Lessons for Pandemic Planning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ethical & Legal Issues for Schools of Nursing During SARS: Lessons for Pandemic Planning Betty Burcher, RN, MSc Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto CASN Council Breakfast: November 15, 2006

  2. SARS & the Faculty of Nursing • Extraordinary impact on Faculty of Nursing • Created SARS Fast Response Team • “To protect the health and safety of our students, faculty and staff during the SARS situation.” • Community of 670 individuals [May 2003]

  3. Impact on Education During SARS 1 • BScN program: • Students suspended from hospitals for 6 - 8 weeks, missed parts of rotations • Classes continued • Web-based learning, creative alternatives • MN program: • Classes suspended week by week • Hospitals needed staff or prohibited intermingling with other health care workers

  4. SARS 2 - Our Turn • 185 BScN students in 22 clinical sites • 50 students & faculty in quarantine • 8 students ill during quarantine and/or placement in level 2 or 3 units • 2 students infected with SARS (from workplace exposures) • Disrupted, delayed, extended or replacement clinicals but all completed!

  5. Lack of Information & Communication • Lack of communication between: • university administration, • health sciences faculties, • hospitals and • public health • No central “desk” for education sector • Resorted to newspapers, scanning of websites, personal contacts, rumours, frequent back-door calls to Toronto Public Health & expertise of each other

  6. Issues Re Clinical Placements • Truth-telling: did we have confidence in reported hospital status? • Some hospitals delayed reporting their status to public health • Inconsistent infection control practices across and within 22 clinical sites: we needed to be consistent for our students • Who makes the decision? Clinical site, educational institution, local public health agency or the provincial MOH

  7. Issues Re Students • Complex status of ill students: • Students (full-time or part-time), • Health care workers (full-time or part-time), • Ill patients in the health-care system, • Suspect SARS case or PUI [person under investigation]: surveillance from public health • No occupational health services so we did it ourselves: • Privacy issues: faculty monitoring the health of students & other faculty • Confidentiality issues: quarantine, PUI & SARS cases: sharing information with h-c providers, workplaces, students & faculty • Classmate/faculty support versus stigma

  8. Decision-making Issues for Our SARS Team • Decision-making: fear or evidence? • What were our parameters of responsibility? • No precedents for decision-making during a crisis • Many students and part-time faculty were also hospital employees • What was our risk-management and liability? • Issues of communication within the faculty & university • Repercussions of our decisions for relationships with our hospital partners

  9. SARS to Pandemic Planning • Health sciences education sector advocacy post-SARS • SARS was primarily a nosocomial infection • Ontario health plan for an influenza pandemic [2006] • Council of Ontario Universities • U. Of Toronto Health Sciences Pandemic Planning Committee

  10. Summary: Legal Issues • Clarity re authority, roles & decision-making responsibilities • Decision-making body in university • Decision-making body in Faculty with clear parameters • Risk-management & risk-communication expertise • Infection control, occupational health & disease surveillance

  11. Summary: Ethical Issues • Privacy for students, faculty & staff • Confidentiality for students & faculty • Transparency & accountability • Duty to care • Planning, priority-setting & preparedness • University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics Pandemic Influenza Working Group (2005). Stand on Guard for Thee: Ethical considerations in preparedness for pandemic influenza. Retrieved from http://www.utoronto.ca/jcb/home/documents/pandemic.pdf

  12. Thank You

More Related