critical issues in evaluating educational technology l.
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Critical Issues in Evaluating Educational Technology

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 17

Critical Issues in Evaluating Educational Technology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 146 Views
  • Uploaded on

Critical Issues in Evaluating Educational Technology. Mark Hawkes Dakota State University Presentation at the American Evaluation Association Annual Conference, Nov. 2, 2000. 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000. $5.2 Billion $6.0 Billion $7.2 Billion. School Expenditure on Technology.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Critical Issues in Evaluating Educational Technology' - welcome


Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
critical issues in evaluating educational technology

Critical Issues in Evaluating EducationalTechnology

Mark Hawkes

Dakota State University

Presentation at the American Evaluation

Association Annual Conference,

Nov. 2, 2000

school expenditure on technology
1997-98

1998-99

1999-2000

$5.2 Billion

$6.0 Billion

$7.2 Billion

School Expenditure on Technology
the secretary s conference on educational technology evaluating the effectiveness of technology
The Secretary’s Conference on Educational TechnologyEvaluating the Effectiveness of Technology
  • The effectiveness of technology is embedded in the effectiveness of other school improvement efforts.
  • Standardized test scores offer limited formative information with which to drive the development of a school’s technology program.
critical issues
Critical Issues…
  • Current evaluation practices need broadening.
  • Schools must document and report their evaluation findings in ways that satisfy diverse stakeholders’ need to know.
  • Everyone must agree on a common language and standards of practice for measuring how schools achieve that end.
critical issues5
Critical Issues . . .
  • The role of teachers is crucial in evaluating the effectiveness of technology in schools.
  • Some existing policies need to be “transformed” to match the new needs of schools using technology.
scope of evaluation status then
Scope of Evaluation: status then
  • Technology focus: Drill-and-practice software, integrated learning systems, videotaped lessons, computer-animated picture books, low-level problem-solving and simulation computer software
  • Professional Development: Participation, topics, accessibility, quality
  • Hardware capability: Processing speed, memory, application functionality
  • Student products
  • Rate of implementation
scope of evaluation status now
Scope of Evaluation: status now
  • Technology: information-processing and productivity tool
  • Professional Development: relationship to student performance with technology
  • Breadth of technology vision
    • Level and breadth of ownership
    • Community involvement
    • Propensity for new practice
metrics status then
Metrics: status then
  • Standardized measures (IGAP, ITBS, CTBS)
  • Student-to-computer ratio
  • Survey:
    • Self-report (competency, nature of use)
    • Affect oriented
  • Behavioral indicators
    • Attendance/Graduation rates
    • Principal referrals
    • Post-secondary options
  • Teacher discourse: Technology-centered
metrics status now
Metrics: status now
  • Critical incident analysis
    • Incidents of learning activities that reflect job-related skills and performances
      • Token Economies
      • Media Production
      • Comparative science
  • Nature of discourse, signs of:
    • Teacher-centered—nature of pedagogy
    • Student centered—constructivist pedagogy
  • Classroom observation of innovative uses
role of teacher status then
Role of Teacher: status then
  • Hands on time with the technology
    • Trips to the lab
    • Types of activities
    • Tools used
  • Report affective measures
    • Student attitudes toward technology
  • Document categories of outcomes (motivational, behavioral)
role of teacher status now
Role of Teacher: status now
  • Teacher activity logs
  • Journaling on how teachers implemented technology facilitated instructional strategies with corresponding outcomes
  • Content area professionals in examining how technology is linked to state learning standards
  • Examining relationship between instructional practices and teaching and learning roles
technology policy status then
Technology Policy: status then
  • Lab topology; limited access detached form the learning experience
  • Access to technology resources (equity)
  • Focus with use policy and security
    • Acceptable Internet use
    • Email accounts
technology policy status now
Technology Policy: status now
  • Aligning school support systems with technology outcomes
    • Libraries as information centers
    • Continuous financial support to sustain system components
  • Exploring technology use opportunities that extends learning beyond the school day
    • Extended lab hours
    • Lap top check-out
inputs outputs
Inputs Outputs
  • Infrastructure Student motivation
  • Wireless features Accessibility
  • Restructured leadership Improved PD
  • New roles for Improved use of support services services
  • Individual Staff Renewed teacher development plans skill building
  • Competitive Improved efficiency collaboration grants in technology use
over the two years
Over the two years . . .
  • Continued reliance on standardized measures
  • Policy at all levels remain prohibitive in many cases
  • Improved support for technology purchases and professional development
  • Limited examination of systemic indicators:

- Vision of technology use

- Support for technology implementation

- Community roles and involvement

- Administrative effectiveness

over the two years16
Over the two years . . .
  • Parsing the effects of technology from the numerous school improvement ventures in the school proves virtually impossible
  • Growth needed in collaborative “gap analysis” and deployment of technology to address those gaps
  • Efforts to evaluate look quasi-experimental, have more attributes of research than evaluation
slides available at www homepages dsu edu hawkesm presentations htm

Slides available at:www.homepages.dsu.edu/hawkesm/ Presentations.htm

Paper available at:

www.ed.gov/Technology/TechConf/1999/confsum.html

ad