1 / 14

Environmental Indicator Report 2012

Environmental Indicator Report 2012. Meeting on Environmental Assessments 16-17 April 2013. [2] Our state of environment report (SOER 2010) stresses a familiar message: there has been progress, but not enough.

wdeshong
Download Presentation

Environmental Indicator Report 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Environmental Indicator Report 2012 Meeting on Environmental Assessments 16-17 April 2013

  2. [2] Our state of environment report (SOER 2010) stresses a familiar message: there has been progress, but not enough ‘Environmental policy has delivered substantial improvements […] however, major environmental challenges remainwhich will have significant consequences […] if left unaddressed.’ Source: SOER 2010 ‘What differs […] is an enhanced understanding of the linksbetween environmental challenges and with unprecedented global megatrends. This has allowed a deeper appreciation of the human-made systemic risksand […] insight into the shortcomings of governance.’ Source: SOER 2010

  3. [3] Over time, our understanding of environmental challenges and their underlying causes has evolved Source: SOER 2010

  4. [4] SOER 2010 offers reflections on future environmental priorities - four ‘I‘ provide headings for strategic action Implementation Better implementation and further strengthening of current environmental priorities Integration Coherent integration of environmental consideration across the many sectoral policy domains Inter-linkages Dedicated management of natural capital and ecosystem services (increasing resource efficiency and resilience) • International dimension • Transform to a green economy to manage natural capital sustainably within Europe … and beyond

  5. [5] At the core of a green economy is a dual challenge: improving resource efficiency and ensuring resilience Ecosystem(natural capital) goal: ensure ecological resilience Economy (produced capital) goal: improve resource efficiency Human well-being (social and human capital) goal: enhance social equity and fair burden-sharing GREENECONOMY

  6. [6] What do we mean by ecosystem resilience? • The capacity of an ecosystem to tolerate disturbance without collapsing into a • (qualitatively) different state. • The notion of ecosystem resilience builds on • capacity to resist change, • ability to retain on structure and function despite change, • ability to reorganise following disturbance. • Concept of ecosystem resilience can be linked with discussion about environmental state, global tipping points, planetary boundaries. Ecosystem(natural capital) goal: ensure ecosystem resilience

  7. [7] What do we mean by resource efficiency? Simply put, resource efficiency compares resource inputs to economic outputs. The EU aims to be a resource efficient economy that ‘is competitive, inclusive and provides a high standard of living with much lower environmental impacts‘. Concept of improving resource efficiency is linked to environmental pressuresand ‘decoupling‘ of economy growth. Economy (produced capital) goal: improve resource efficiency

  8. The European Environment Agency (EEA) provides objective, reliable and comparable information One of key tasks of the EEA is ‘to publish a report on the state of, trends in and prospects for the environment every five years, supplemented by indicator reports focusing on specific issues’. (Regulation (EC) No 401/2009, Art 2(k)) .EEA hosts more than 200 environmental indicators across 12 environmental themes. Energy indicators(29 / 5 CSI) Transport indicators(38 / 3 CSI) Climate change indcators (42+4 / 5 CSI) Biodiversity indicators (25+2 / 3 CSI) Waste indicators(2 / 2 CSI) EEA core indicators (37 CSI) Air pollution indicators (6+5 / 5 CSI) Water indicators (7+7 / 7 CSI) Fisheries indicators (3 / 3 CSI) Agriculture indicators (2 / 2 CSI) Land & Soil indicators (2/ 2 CSI) Environmental scenarios indicators (45 / 0 CSI) Tourism indicators(7 / 0 CSI) Based on Monitoring->Data->Indicators->Assessment->Knowledge chain .

  9. [8] Environmental indicator report 2012 shows progress in meeting dual challenge (resilience & resource efficiency) • Assessment based on existing environmental indicators;no new ‘green economy‘ indicators have been developed. • Pressure indicators to illustrate resource efficiency; State indicators to illustrate ecosystem resilience. • Six thematic indicator-based assessments: • Nitrogen emissios and threats to biodiversity • Carbon emissions and climate change • Air pollution and air quality • Maritime activties and the marine environment • Water use and water stress • Use of material resources and waste management D R P I S

  10. [9] Examples from environmental indicator report 2012- Chapter 5 (carbon emissions and climate change) Carbon and climate Sector: Renewable energy [ENER 29] State: Average temperature [CSI 012] Pressure: GHG emissions [CSI 010]  

  11. [10] Summing up: environmental ‘pressure‘ indicators to illustrate progress in improving resource efficiency

  12. [11] Summing up: environmental ‘state‘ indicators to illustrate whether we are ensuring ecosystem resilience Links between environmental challenges & global context- indicators related to status / ecological resilience

  13. [12] Reflections on progress towards resource efficiency, ecosystem resilience and a green economy in Europe • By and large, European environmental policies appear to have had a clearer impact on improving resource efficiency than on maintaining ecosystem resilience. • Environmental indicators highlight that improving resource efficiency remains necessary, but in itself isnot sufficient to ensure a sustainable natural environment. • In a green economy policy context, there would be value in considering objectives and targets that more explicitly recognise the links between resource efficiency, ecosystem resilience and human well-being.

  14. Ecosystem(natural capital) goal: ensure ecosystem resilience Economy (produced capital) goal: improve resource efficiency Thank you adriana.gheorghe@eea.europa.euFor further information, please visit: www.eea.europa.eu Human well-being (social and human capital) goal: enhance social equity and fair burden-sharing GREENECONOMY

More Related