1 / 11

D 0 K - , + reconstruction with CBM STS detector

D 0 K - , + reconstruction with CBM STS detector. I.Vassiliev (GSI) CBM collaboration meeting 06-Oct-04. Simulation tools (cbmroot) & geometry Signal and Background simulation Tracking & Vertexing Variables and cuts. Cuts optimisation Trigger feasibility study Outline.

Download Presentation

D 0 K - , + reconstruction with CBM STS detector

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. D0 K-,+ reconstructionwith CBM STS detector I.Vassiliev (GSI) CBM collaboration meeting 06-Oct-04 Simulation tools (cbmroot) & geometry Signal and Background simulation Tracking & Vertexing Variables and cuts. Cuts optimisation Trigger feasibility study Outline

  2. Simulation tools (cbmroot) & geometry SBM framework last edition (3 first Sts in vacuum); "standard" and 700 m thickness STS geometry; 7 stations at 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 cm; stations at 5 and10 cm - 100 m others 200 m single Au target 500 m,  = 10 m (double) hit displacement (Gaussian smearing) at CbmStsDoubleHitProducer.cxx GEANT3, UrQmd (25 Gev) and D0 K-,+(by V.Friese) generators; no Magnetic Field, but dP/P = 1%

  3. Signal and Background simulation Signal - 105 events D0 K-,+ Background – 104 UrQmd events mixed 103 events IM(GeV/c2)

  4. Tracking & Vertexing Tracking & Vertexing developed by I.Kisel: CbmITrack, CbmStsmctracks2rsegs,CbmStsRefit CbmStsPerformance; CbmStsPrimaryVertex, StsSecondaryVertex    CbmStsAnalysis: Event Topology (MC), RSEGs analysis K (K0S;0;  -;  -;D0) K0S  - 0 IM (GeV/c2)

  5. Tracking & Vertexing  = 57 m Zv (cm) MC Zv – RECO Zv (cm)

  6. Variables and cuts. Cuts optimisation Impact Parameter (IP > 80 m); Z-vertex for D0 K-,+ (Z2 > 250 m); P D0 pointing to the Primary Vertex; PtK-,+ > 0.5 (0.45) GeV; P K-,+ >1.5 GeV; 2 < 5 for the Secondary vertex (cm)

  7. Variables and cuts. Cuts optimisation PtK-,+ and P K-,+ cuts optimisation Signal Background Signal Background (GeV)

  8. Variables and cuts. Cuts optimisation  P D0 pointing to the Primary Vertex cut optimisation Signal Background (cm)

  9. Trigger feasibility study Background 104 events IP,P,Pt Vz • No Particle ID • realistic tracking • and vertexing • ~400 reduction factor • ~10-3 D0 per event with • BR~3.65% • ~900 charged hadrons per event all cuts D0pont;2 11 events IM (GeV/c2)

  10. Trigger feasibility study 103 mix events: Urqmd+D0 K-,+ MC MC IP,P,Pt cuts Reco IP,P,Pt cuts Reco all cuts IM (GeV/c2)

  11. Outline • MC simulation shows feasibility to measure • D0K- + + withCBM STS "standard" detector geometry • Developed cuts allows to create Trigger model with • RF ~ 600 and S/B ratio ~ 0.8 (more with PID) • 700 m thickness STS stations study is going on • Magnetic Field

More Related