1 / 51

Reconstruction of the Oral Cavity

Introduction. Difficult challengeComplex anatomy and functionGoals Restore preoperative functionCosmesisPatient status is important considerationVariety of reconstruction options. Anatomy. Vermilion to junction of hard and soft palate superiorlyInferiorly to circumvallate papillaeStructures:

tanuja
Download Presentation

Reconstruction of the Oral Cavity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Reconstruction of the Oral Cavity Michael Underbrink, M.D. Anna Pou, M.D.

    2. Introduction Difficult challenge Complex anatomy and function Goals Restore preoperative function Cosmesis Patient status is important consideration Variety of reconstruction options

    3. Anatomy Vermilion to junction of hard and soft palate superiorly Inferiorly to circumvallate papillae Structures: lips, alveolar ridges, buccal mucosa, retromolar trigone, hard palate, floor of mouth, mobile tongue Functions: speech, mastication, bolus preparation and initiation of deglutition

    4. Functional Considerations Oral sphincter Speech, mastication and deglutition Provides a watertight closure for bolus preparation Prevents escape of saliva

    5. Functional Considerations Alveolar Ridges Covered with thin, adherent mucosa Elevated above floor of mouth Lingual and buccal sulci direct the flow of food and saliva during bolus processing

    6. Functional Considerations Floor of the mouth Allows unrestricted mobility of the oral tongue Collects food and saliva (bolus preparation)

    7. Functional Considerations Oral (mobile) tongue Speech and deglutition Mobility allows for: Articulation of speech Bolus manipulation in preparation for deglutition Sensory functions: proprioception, pain, taste Assists in mastication and bolus processing

    8. Functional Considerations Hard palate Opposes tongue Important for speech and bolus preparation

    9. Functional Considerations Buccal Mucosa Lines the cheek Functions in mastication and deglutition Allows expansion for mastication Thin to avoid restriction of dental closure

    10. Functional Considerations Base of tongue Often involved with oral cavity defects Participates in taste, deglutition and speech Must occlude oropharynx during deglutition Some consonants require BOT to touch hard palate

    11. Patient Factors Individualize options Type of tissue Anticipated functional gain Anticipated donor morbidity Need for innervation Success rate Intraoperative positioning Operative time Dental restoration Overall medical status

    12. Patient Factors Preoperative counseling Complete medical history Diabetes, atherosclerosis, previous radiation Cardiopulmonary status (operating time, aspiration risk) Smoking history Patient expectations and motivation are very important

    13. Floor of Mouth Reconstruction Requires soft and mobile tissue Allow mobility of oral tongue Avoid scar contracture (i.e., secondary intention) Avoid bulk (glossoptosis, obliteration of lower lip sulcus)

    14. Floor of Mouth Reconstruction Smaller defects Split thickness skin graft Harvest from lateral thigh at 0.017 in Provides water-tight closure, no hair Stabilize with bolster Survives over muscle and cancellous bone (via imbibition and neovascularization) Also good for lateral FOM and retromolar trigone

    15. Floor of Mouth Reconstruction

    16. Floor of Mouth Reconstruction Moderate defects involving a larger portion of mylohyoid Nasolabial flap Based on angular artery Better for older patients with lax skin Requires two stages and temporary fistula Bite block necessary

    17. Floor of Mouth Reconstruction

    18. Floor of Mouth Reconstruction Moderate defects (continued) Regional flaps Forehead flap (rarely used) Platysma flap Facial artery musculomucosal flap (FAMM) Deltopectoral flap (historical significance)

    19. Floor of Mouth Reconstruction Forehead flap Superficial temporal artery Reliable 2/3 across the forehead Tunneled into cheek below zygoma Requires orocutaneous fistula Obvious donor site (skin graft) Second stage to inset flap

    20. Floor of Mouth Reconstruction Submental artery island flap Thin, supple skin Submental branch of facial artery Primary closure of donor site Poor reliability if: Facial artery sacrificed Irradiated necks

    21. Floor of Mouth Platysma Flap Reconstruction

    22. Floor of Mouth Reconstruction FAMM flap Branch of facial artery Contains mucosa, buccinator muscle, and fat 2 x 8 cm flap without injury to facial nerve

    23. Floor of Mouth Reconstruction

    24. Floor of Mouth Reconstruction Deltopectoral Flap Axial distant flap First four perforators of internal mammary Deltoid portion is random Preliminary delay procedure Creates dependent orocutaneous fistula

    25. Floor of Mouth Reconstruction Fasciocutaneous free flaps Thin nature and pliability Radial forearm has low incidence of failure to this site Provides tongue mobility and free movement of food during deglutition

    26. Floor of Mouth Reconstruction Radial forearm free flap Based on radial artery Outflow: two venae comitantes, basilic vein, cephalic vein Long vascular pedicle with dependable supply Potential sensation (posterior cutaneous nerve anastomosed to lingual) Disadvantage: donor site morbidity (STSG, potential loss of thumb and index finger, potential decreased forearm function)

    27. Floor of Mouth Reconstruction

    28. Anterior Tongue Reconstruction Very difficult to reconstruct Complex intrinsic musculature and function Redundancy is advantageous Near hemiglossectomy does not significantly alter function

    29. Anterior Tongue Reconstruction Defects <50% can be closed primarily +/- STSG Larger or composite defects require more bulk (i.e, fasciocutaneous free flap) Lateral arm free flap is good for defects including posterior aspect of tongue/FOM

    30. Anterior Tongue Reconstruction

    31. Anterior Tongue Reconstruction

    32. Anterior Tongue Reconstruction Lateral Arm free flap Posterior radial collateral artery Paired venae comitantes 12 x 18 cm paddle possible (6 x 8 cm allows for primary closure) Potential sensate flap (posterior cutaneous nerve) Disadvantages: donor site appearance, hair growth, elbow pain, lateral forearm numbness

    33. Anterior Tongue Reconstruction

    34. Buccal Cavity Reconstruction Small defects – primary closure possible Larger superficial defects Quilted skin/mucosal grafts Temporoparietal fascial flap (STSG for lining) Large full-thickness defects Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap Fasciocutaneous free flaps

    35. Buccal Cavity Reconstruction

    36. Mandibular Reconstruction Goals Reconstitute mandibular continuity Allow for future dental restoration Anterior defects Worst functional defects “Andy Gump” deformity Lateral defects Easier to reconstruct Less functional problems

    37. Mandibular Reconstruction Fibula osseocutaneous free flap ideal for anterior defects (minimal soft tissue defect) Based on peroneal vessels Multiple osteotomies allowable (for contouring) 25 cm of bone available (entire defects) Sensate (lateral cutaneous nerve) Reliable for osseointegrated dental implants

    38. Fibula Free Flap

    39. Fibula Free Flap

    40. Mandibular Reconstruction Scapular free flap for anterior defects with massive soft tissue loss (i.e., total glossectomy) Circumflex scapular artery and vein 14 cm of bone available (lateral aspect) Allows osseointegrated implants Long pedicle to axillary artery Multiple fasciocutaneous/musculocutaneous flaps available (scapular, parascapular, latissimus dorsi, serratus anterior) Major drawback: patient positioning

    41. Scapula Free Flap

    42. Mandibular Reconstruction Lateral mandible defects Regional/Distant/Free flap with mandibular swing Low profile reconstruction plate with soft tissue coverage Patient factors which prevent dental restoration Plate exposure rate of about 5% Compared to anterior exposure rate near 20% Osseocutaneous free flaps (iliac, scapular, fibula)

    43. Mandibular Reconstruction

    44. Mandibular Reconstruction Iliac crest free flap for lateral defects Internal oblique musculature included Contour similar to native mandible Reliable for osseointegrated implants Deep circumflex iliac artery Disadvantages (difficult harvest, donor site deformity, abdominal weakness, postoperative hematoma, lateral thigh pain/anesthesia) Split inner cortex modification reduces morbidity

    45. Mandibular Reconstruction

    46. Mandibular Reconstruction

    47. Special Considerations Total Glossectomy Defects Often accompany oral cavity defects with extensive disease Require bulk for reconstruction Goals Direct secretions laterally Provide contact of neo-tongue with palate Use flaps which will not atrophy over time Palatal drop prosthesis

    48. Special Considerations Total Glossectomy Defects Rectus abdominis free flap Inferior and superior epigastric arteries Motor nerve (intercostal) anastomosis retains bulk Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous free flap Thoracodorsal artery Motor nerve (thoracodorsal) Pedicled flaps (PMMF, latissimus dorsi)

    49. Special Considerations Total glossectomy with laryngeal preservation Select patients Good health without cardiopulmonary disease Can tolerate aspiration Disease does not involve valleculae or preepiglottic space Must maintain intact superior laryngeal nerve Laryngeal suspension lessens aspiration

    51. Conclusion Multitude of reconstructive options Remember functional characteristics of tissue involved Various patient factors to consider Preoperative counseling essential High success rates possible with proper patient selection

    52. References Fong BP, Funk GF. Osseous free tissue transfer in head and neck reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg. 1999; 15(1): 45-59   Liu R, Gullane P, Brown D, Irish J. Pectoralis major myocutaneous pedicled flap in head and neck reconstruction: retrospective review of indications and results in 244 consecutive cases at the Toronto General Hospital. J Otolaryngol. 2001 Feb; 30(1): 34-40   Abemayor E, Blackwell KE. Reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the oral cavity and oropharynx. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Jul; 126(7): 909-12   Berenholz L, Kessler A, Segal S. Platysma myocutaneous flap for intraoral reconstruction: an option in the compromised patient. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Aug; 28(4): 285-7   Burkey BB, Coleman JR Jr. Current concepts in oromandibular reconstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1997 Aug; 30(4): 607-30   Wells MD, Edwards AL, Luce EA. Intraoral reconstructive techniques. Clin Plast Surg. 1995 Jan; 22(1): 91-108   Hausamen JE, Neukam FW. Resection of tumors in tongue, floor of the mouth, and mandible: possibilities of primary reconstruction. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1994; 134:25-35   Boyd JB. Use of reconstruction plates in conjunction with soft-tissue free flaps for oromandibular reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 1994 Jan; 21(1): 69-77   Yousif NJ, Matloub HS, Sanger JR, Campbell B. Soft-tissue reconstruction of the oral cavity. Clin Plast Surg. 1994 Jan; 21(1): 15-23

More Related