1 / 10

Evolution

Evolution. Martin Sewell 31 March 2014 University of Cambridge. Introduction. A concise account of evolution. From the most general to human evolution. Show that cooperation is key, and competition proximal, in reproductive systems.

vartan
Download Presentation

Evolution

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evolution Martin Sewell 31 March 2014 University of Cambridge

  2. Introduction • A concise account of evolution. • From the most general to human evolution. • Show that cooperation is key, and competition proximal, in reproductive systems. • Without invoking altruism, group selection, the prisoner’s dilemma or transcending our genes.

  3. Selfish Gene Theory • At any point in time, the world around us is subject to ‘survivorship bias’. • Inanimate entities being subject to survival themselves. • The biological world utilizes entities that ‘self-replicate’. • The entities are genes and the process evolution. • Genes are biased towards survival (Dawkins 1976).

  4. Reproduction • Reproduction is the process by which vehicles for genes produce further vehicles for genes. • The vehicles for genes have evolved to maximize gene replication by maximizing reproduction via maximizing reproductive efficiency. • Such underlying cooperation does not mean that there is cooperation regarding reproduction among individuals. • Because it is in the collective interest to reproductively suppress many individuals. • Vehicles for genes may be a single organism, two organisms or a group of organisms.

  5. Sexual Reproduction • Sexual reproduction is the creation of a new organism by combining the genetic material of two organisms. • A hermaphrodite is an organism that has reproductive organs normally associated with both male and female sexes. • Imagine a population of hermaphrodites. • Some will be genetically biased towards putting more time and effort into mating and their genes will thrive as they inseminate many others. • Others will be biased towards expending energy by producing eggs and bearing babies, they will also be genetically successful as can do their best to ensure their children survive. • Those individuals who lie in the middle, and specialise in neither activity, will die out. • The first type leads to a small active gamete, the second to a larger static gamete. • Intrasexual competition ensures that this dichotomy persists. • See Parker, Baker and Smith (1972).

  6. Bateman’s Principle • In all sexually reproducing species, the relative investment that is made by the male and the female in their offspring determines the degree of discrimination exercised by the individual when selecting a mate. • This is known as Bateman’s principle (Bateman 1948). • In humans, females give birth to their offspring, whilst men do not, so females can be expected to be the more discriminating sex. • The distribution of men’s mate value has a greater variance and more of a positive skew than the corresponding distribution for women. • Females limit the reproductive success of males, and men compete with other men for access to women.

  7. Dominance Hierarchy • Males will tend to bias their likelihood of engaging in contests based on the outcomes of previous contests, and self-organize into a dominance hierarchy. • Dominance is an adaptation to allocate reproduction differentially so that over time gene replication is maximized. • The most efficient solution is to put all of the genetic defect filtration process on one side of the lineage. • Men have evolved to act as ‘filters’ for genetic material (Atmar 1991, Moxon 2008). • By stretching men out in a dominance hierarchy, genetic material that enhances the lineage is retained, whilst deleterious genetic material is eliminated from the lineage. • In contrast, women have evolved to associate in a female social network that is an extension of family and friends, and which is relatively equitable and personal. • There is no dominance relationship (or competition) between men and women.

  8. Policing • Over time ‘policing’ of the male dominance hierarchy comes about through lineage selection (Nunney 1999). • Lineage selection favours the long term over the short term and recruits genes that encourage cooperation. • A cognitive mechanism known as cheater detection (Cosmides 1989) evolved to police tactical subversion of the dominance hierarchy, and prevent men from circumventing it. • An adaptation that maximizes gene replication.

  9. Future • The ultimate trajectory of evolution is towards making reproduction increasingly efficient. • Species become increasingly complex providing them with greater flexibility of behaviour. • Humans exhibit high intelligence that allows them to better exploit their environment in order to achieve their proximate goals, but not necessarily help fulfil their ultimate goal of reproduction. • It could be that, due to the invention of contraception, human intelligence has peaked. • We will never transcend our genes (Moxon 2010) (and nor would we wish to).

  10. References ATMAR, Wirt, 1991. On the role of males. Animal Behaviour, 41(2), 195–205. BATEMAN, A. J., 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2(3), 349–368. COSMIDES, Leda, 1989. The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31(3), 187–276. DAWKINS, Richard, 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press. MOXON, Steve, 2008. Dominance hierarchy as integral to reproductive suppression; an adaptation consequent to the evolution of the male. In: Marco COSTA and Stefano TAMPELLINI, eds. XIX Biennial Conference of the International Society for Human Ethology. Bologna: The International Society For Human Ethology, pp. 81–82. MOXON, Steve, 2010. Culture is biology: Why we cannot ‘transcend’ our genes—or ourselves. Politics and Culture, 1. NUNNEY, Leonard, 1999. Lineage selection: Natural selection for long-term benefit. In: Laurent KELLER, ed. Levels of Selection in Evolution, Monographs in Behavior and Ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, Chapter 12, pp. 238–252. PARKER, G. A., R. R. BAKER, and V. G. F. SMITH, 1972. The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenon. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 36(3), 529–553.

More Related