1 / 18

The “How We Roll” Bicycle Safety Program

The “How We Roll” Bicycle Safety Program. Ohio’s Investment in College Campuses. How We Roll - Presenters. Andrew Davis, P.E., Department of Public Service, City of Akron, OH adavis@akronohio.gov

Download Presentation

The “How We Roll” Bicycle Safety Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The “How We Roll” Bicycle Safety Program Ohio’s Investment in College Campuses

  2. How We Roll - Presenters • Andrew Davis, P.E., Department of Public Service, City of Akron, OH • adavis@akronohio.gov • Victor Pinheiro, Ph.D., Director School of Sport Science & Wellness Education at the University of Akron • victor@uakron.edu

  3. How We Roll – University of Akron • Replication and Extension of program started at the Ohio State University in 2011-2012 • Contracting with the University to implement • The University of Akron is a smaller campus at 28,000 students with a relatively new bike culture, and new residential growth • With growing number of cyclists in Akron there has been an increase in cyclist crashes reported. • How can cycling ridership grow and be safe at the same time?

  4. How We Roll – University of Akron • What factors influence college students and community members to participate in the How We Roll bicycle safety program? • What are the outcomes and benefits for those who choose to participate in the program?

  5. Method • How We Roll Tour • Light Kits • Benefits • Trained Student Leaders • Students and Community Members • Outreach • Data: Surveys, Interviews and Focus Groups

  6. Method – How We Roll Tour • 6-8 Mile bicycle ride with two trained guides • Begins with a short orientation to riding in traffic, and safe riding instruction throughout ride. • V – Visible • P – Predictable • O – Obey all traffic laws • Emphasis is on having fun and seeing new sights. • Safety training intervention under cover of “having a good time”!

  7. Method – Light Kits & Other Benefits • 700 Free Front & Rear Light Sets • Part of tour, but also would do give aways • Reached a lot of disadvantaged persons • How We Roll Reflective Dri-Fit T-Shirt • Branded Posters, Drawstring Bags, Spoke Cards • DoDowntown Cards – DAP’s Entertainment Book

  8. Method – Student Leaders • School of Sport Science & Wellness Education at the University of Akron • Graduate Assistant – Oversaw operations, planned and coordinated events, managed student tour guides, assisted with research • Student Assistants – Were trained by LCI to lead tours and would always work in pairs • Service Learning Opportunity for all the students – to work and make an impact on community, develop leadership skills • Many comments on their professionalism and positive presentation • Not your typical “bike enthusiast,” but where healthy lifestyle oriented

  9. Method – Students & Community Members First target in Fall 2013 was university students In Spring-Summer 2014 we expanded to all community members This was done due to smaller student population and having a large community population within 5 miles of the University.

  10. Method - Outreach • Peer driven outreach – trying to get excitement going via word of mouth. Later by specifically calling on various groups of people: • Greeks, Student Organizations, Residence Halls, Classes & Departments • Large Employers in the Akron Area • Churches, YMCA, Hospitals • More traditional – going to the media • Summer 2014 – Nice Front Page Article in a couple of publications • Partnering • Downtown Akron Partnership – Noon Green & Fit Celebrity Rides • AMATS – Switching Gears Website; Active Transportation Conference • Bike Party! – Monthly Friday Night Rides

  11. Method – Data Collection • Surveys • On-line registration for tours included short pre-survey • 4 Week Follow-up Survey using Qualtrics • Interviews • 1 on 1 semi-structured interviews – students & community members • Focus Groups • Several – primarily college students

  12. Results - Surveys • To date 380 participants; 351 surveys sent • 177 responses (50 % response rate) • 57% Female; 43% Male • 92% Caucasian; 6% African American; 1% Asian; 1% Other • 21% University of Akron Students • 79% Community Members

  13. Results - Surveys • Pre-Tour Survey Data • Findings from Post Survey Data • 91% Have a working bike where they live; 93% have a helmet • Confidence Maneuvering Bicycle: 66% Lots; 29% Fair Amount • Confidence Riding on Road: 42% Lots; 39% Fair Amount • Confidence Understanding Traffic Law: 44% Lots; 43% Fair Amount • Stop at Red Lights: 79% Lots • Stop at Stop Signs: 56% Lots; 33% Fair Amount • Wear Helmet When Riding: 64% Lots

  14. Results – Interviews & Focus Groups • Experienced Riders– learning way around town and finding new places to visit; seeing city up close on bike vs. from a car • Low to Moderate Experienced Riders– ability to ride in traffic; how short distances are on bike; increased confidence riding in the street; learning way around town and finding new places to visit • More tolerance for cyclists when driving; less judgmental • Social aspect of ride was fun; Free Bike Lights! • Inspired to ride more; Could use the bicycle as an alternative mode of transportation • Friendliness and professionalism of Guides • History of City and points of interest • Suggestions for City and University to improve cycling conditions

  15. Discussion – Lessons Learned • Participants found ride very enjoyable and interesting, and at the same time increased their confidence of riding on the road. • Getting to know Akron up close versus in a car, and how close destinations are on a bike. • Lights were very popular (700), and we were able to serve population that does not have access to car. • Reported increased obeying traffic laws and use of helmets • Tested various outreach methods; program does need time to develop – minimum 2 years • Collaboration with University very positive and provided meaningful service learning opportunities for students while making community impact

  16. Discussion - Limitations • As a case study the findings are not generalizable, but audience can determine for themselves what aspects may be applicable in their area. • Improve evaluation measures to be able to compare different sites – i.e. Akron and Columbus • Each university may have different resources, student population & existing bicycle culture • Limited age to less than 65 years old

  17. Future Recommendations • Implementation Guide currently being written to help other universities and communities who are interested in the How We Roll Bicycle Tour program. • How We Roll has potential for youth programming. • Extend study beyond age 64, to include older adults; we had many participate. They have time and money to find events like this. • Use college students for running this program at any level. May need to consider qualifications that emphasize people skills, and set clear schedule for tours.

  18. Questions? • See Akron Beacon Journal Story: • http://www.ohio.com/news/local/bicyclists-pedal-through-downtown-akron-to-see-city-and-learn-on-street-pedaling-1.501958?fb_action_ids=718832534822172&fb_action_types=og.comments

More Related