\nVisit Below Link, To Download This Course:\n\nhttps://www.tutorialsservice.net/product/mgt-501-module-2-case-latest-trident/\n\nOr \nEmail us on\nSUPPORT@TUTORIALSSERVICE.NET\n\nMGT 501 Module 2 Case Latest-Trident\nMGT501\nMGT 501 Module 2 Case Latest-Trident\nModule 2 – Case\nMANAGING GROUPS AND TEAMS\nAssignment Overview\nGroup Dynamics and Teams\nWe will continue our experiential approach to the study of Organizational Behavior by engaging in a personal applied case on the topic of group dynamics and teams. As in module 1, use the following outline to structure your 4-6 page paper. You may use the subtitles as headings for your paper.\n
Visit Below Link, To Download This Course:
Email us on
MGT 501 Module 2 Case Latest-Trident
MGT 501 Module 2 Case Latest-Trident
Module 2 – Case
MANAGING GROUPS AND TEAMS
Group Dynamics and Teams
We will continue our experiential approach to the study of Organizational Behavior by engaging in a
personal applied case on the topic of group dynamics and teams. As in module 1, use the following
outline to structure your 4-6 page paper. You may use the subtitles as headings for your paper.
Introduction: Discuss the topic of the paper and how you will approach it. It is best to write this section
after you have written the rest of the paper
Concrete Experience: Describe an experience with a group or team that was meaningful to you. It may
have been an extraordinarily good experience – or it may have been an experience that did not work out
very well at all! The important point is that it should be an experience which you would like to understand
better. Be objective and focus on just the facts: who, what, where, when, and how – as if you were
composing a newspaper article.
Reflective Observation: Step back from the situation, look at the experience from your own viewpoint,
and from the perspective of all other parties involved or affected. You want to look at the circumstances
surrounding the experience from every relevant point of view. Why did you behave the way that you did?
Why did others behave the way that they did? Did others have the same positive (or negative)
Abstract Conceptualization: Interpret and understand the events you have described by drawing on the
concepts, theories, and models in the background material from this module. Explain how they apply to
your experience. For example, what behavior patterns can you identify in yourself and others that are
similar to the ones described in the material on communication, teams, and conflict management? Does
the model of Force Field Analysis (home page) help you better understand why people behaved the way
they did? Be sure to apply at least two concepts, theories, or models and cite all references to concepts,
ideas, and/or quotes that you use from any outside source.
Active Experimentation: What have you learned about the way groups work from this analysis? What
have you learned from your mistakes? How are you going to put what you have learned to use? What
actions will you take to build more effective work teams in your job?
Conclusion: Sum up the main points of your analysis and the key learning you are taking from it.
Reference List: List all references that you have cited in the paper using APA formatting. References
include materials from the required background readings as well as any outside internet or library sources
you used in researching and writing your paper. If you have APA questions, refer to the optional listings
on the background page.
Your paper will be evaluated using the criteria as stated in the Case rubric. The following is a review of
the rubric criteria:
Assignment-Driven: Does the paper fully address all aspects of the assignment? Is the assignment
addressed accurately and precisely using sound logic? Does the paper meet minimum length
Critical Thinking: Does the paper demonstrate graduate-level analysis, in which information derived
from multiple sources, expert opinions, and assumptions has been critically evaluated and synthesized in
the formulation of a logical set of conclusions? Does the paper address the topic with sufficient depth of
discussion and analysis?
Business Writing: Is the essay logical, well organized and well written? Are the grammar, spelling, and
vocabulary appropriate for graduate-level work? Are section headings included? Are paraphrasing and
synthesis of concepts the primary means of responding, or is justification/support instead conveyed
through excessive use of direct quotations?
Effective Use of Information: Does the submission demonstrate that the student has read, understood
and can apply the background materials for the module? If required, has the student demonstrated
effective research, as evidenced by student’s use of relevant and quality (library?) sources? Do additional
sources used provide strong support for conclusions drawn, and do they help in shaping the overall
Citing Sources: Does the student demonstrate understanding of APA Style of referencing, by inclusion
of proper citations (for paraphrased text and direct quotations) as appropriate? Have all sources (e.g.,
references used from the Background page, the assignment readings, and outside research) been
included, and are these properly cited? Have all sources cited in the paper been included on the
Timeliness:Has the assignment been submitted to TLC (Trident’s learning management system) on or
before the module’s due date?