1 / 7

Sports Website Comparisons League Websites

Sports Website Comparisons League Websites. MBAS 6320 - IT in Sports Larisa Mackey Chris Raynor. The Major Leagues. Evaluation: Criteria & Summary. Key Characteristics: Top Sites. Easy to navigate Clean look & feel High level of brand integration Substantial, well-organized content

teness
Download Presentation

Sports Website Comparisons League Websites

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sports Website ComparisonsLeague Websites MBAS 6320 - IT in Sports Larisa Mackey Chris Raynor

  2. The Major Leagues

  3. Evaluation: Criteria & Summary

  4. Key Characteristics: Top Sites • Easy to navigate • Clean look & feel • High level of brand integration • Substantial, well-organized content • Enables good user experience (e.g., regularly accessed content such as scores are present on the main page) • Easy access to individual teams and information • Strategic inclusion of key sponsors • Good use of now-current technology

  5. Common Characteristics: Poor Sites • Domain name issues (i.e., MLS.net) • Cluttered content on pages • Plain look & feel • Low user engagement • Poor technology integration • Questionable user experience (e.g., certain functions ‘broken’ on certain sites)

  6. Note on League International Efforts Spanish SpanishSpanish Japanese 2 Others

  7. Key Takeaways • Good Practices • Professional, clean look/feel • Easy to navigate • Good user engagement • Integration / availability of current technology • Bad Practices • Unorganized content • Elementary / outdated website design • Poor brand integration • Limited use of technology (e.g., no sound/streaming video upon site entrance)

More Related