1 / 25

# Bivariate Correlation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bivariate Correlation. Lesson 11. Measuring Relationships. Correlation degree relationship b/n 2 variables linear predictive relationship Covariance If X changes, does Y change also? e.g., height ( X ) and weight ( Y ) ~. Covariance. Variance

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

## PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Bivariate Correlation' - talli

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

### BivariateCorrelation

Lesson 11

• Correlation

• degree relationship b/n 2 variables

• linear predictive relationship

• Covariance

• If X changes, does Y change also?

• e.g., height (X) and weight (Y) ~

• Variance

• How much do scores (Xi) vary from mean?

• (standard deviation)2

• Covariance

• How much do scores (Xi, Yi) from their means

• How to interpret size

• Different scales of measurement

• Standardization

• like in z scores

• Divide by standard deviation

• Gets rid of units

• Correlation coefficient (r)

• Both variables quantitative (interval/ratio)

• Values of r

• between -1 and +1

• 0 = no relationship

• Parameter = ρ (rho)

• Types of correlations

• Positive: change in same direction

• X then Y; or X then Y

• Negative: change in opposite direction

• X then Y; or X then Y ~

• Scatter Diagrams

• Also called scatter plots

• 1 variable: Y axis; other X axis

• plot point at intersection of values

• look for trends

• e.g., height vs shoe size ~

7

8

9

10

11

12

Scatter Diagrams

84

78

Height

72

66

60

Shoe size

• Determines sign

• positive or negative

• From lower left to upper right

• positive ~

• From upper left to lower right

• negative ~

• Magnitude of r

• draw imaginary ellipse around most points

• Narrow: r near -1 or +1

• strong relationship between variables

• straight line: perfect relationship (1 or -1)

• Wide: r near 0

• weak relationship between variables ~

Strong negative relationship

r near 0

r near -1

300

300

250

250

Weight

Weight

200

200

150

150

3

3

6

6

9

9

12

12

15

15

18

18

21

21

100

100

Chin ups

Chin ups

Width & value of r

• R2

• Coefficient of Determination

• Proportion of variance in X explained by relationship with Y

• Example: IQ and gray matter volume

• r = .25 (statisically significant)

• R2 = .0625

• Approximately 6% of differences in IQ explained by relationship to gray matter volume ~

*from Statistics for People Who (Think They) Hate Statistics: Excel 2007 Edition By Neil J. Salkind

• Nonlinear relationships

• Pearson’s r does not detect more complex relationships

• r near 0 ~

Peeps (Y)

Stress (X)

• Range restriction

• eliminate values from 1 or both variable

• r is reduced

• e.g. eliminate people under 72 inches ~

• H0: ρ = 0 rho = parameter

H1: ρ≠ 0

• ρCV

• df = n – 2

• Table: Critical values of ρ

• PASW output gives sig.

• Example: n = 30; df=28; nondirectional

• ρCV = + .361

• decision: r = .285 ? r = -.38 ? ~

• Reliability

• Inter-rater reliability

• Validity of a measure

• ACT scores and college success?

• Also GPA, dean’s list, graduation rate, dropout rate

• Effect size

• Alternative to Cohen’s d ~

• Pearson’s r

• r= ±.1

• r = ±.3

• r = ±.5 ~

• Cohen’s d

• Small: d = 0.2

• Medium: d = 0.5

• Large: d = 0.8

Note: Why no zero before decimal for r ?

• Causation requires correlation, but...

• Correlation does not imply causation!

• The 3d variable problem

• Some unkown variable affects both

• e.g. # of household appliances negatively correlated with family size

• Direction of causality

• Like psychology  get good grades

• Or vice versa ~

• One variable dichotomous

• Only two values

• e.g., Sex: male & female

• PASW/SPSS

• Same as for Pearson’s r ~

• Spearman’s rs

• Ordinal

• Non-normal interval/ratio

• Kendall’s Tau

• Large # tied ranks

• Or small data sets

• Maybe better choice than Spearman’s ~

• Data entry

• 1 column per variable

• Analyze  Correlate  Bivariate

• Dialog box

• Select variables

• Choose correlation type

• 1- or 2-tailed test of significance ~

• Guidelines

• No zero before decimal point

• Round to 2 decimal places

• significance: 1- or 2-tailed test

• Use correct symbol for correlation type

• Report significance level

• There was a significant relationship between the number of commercials watch and the amount of candy purchased, r = +.87, p (one-tailed) < .05.

• Creativity was negatively correlated with how well people did in the World’s Biggest Liar Contest, rS = -.37, p (two-tailed) = .001.

• Analysis using the Pearson’s r correlation indicated that the there was moderately strong negative relationship between the number of work hours and the number of hours spent on extracurricular activities, but the relationship was not statistically significant, r = -.31, p (two-tailed) = .08. The R2 = .097, indicating that the relationship accounts for approximately 9.7% of the variance in the number of hours spent in each activity.