1 / 11

Status of Forward Pixel Survey

Status of Forward Pixel Survey. Andrei Gritsan, Mikhail Kubantsev, Nhan Tran* TB Meeting 16/04/08. Concept/Formalism. Each surveyed hierarchy consists of a system of points

swann
Download Presentation

Status of Forward Pixel Survey

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status of Forward Pixel Survey Andrei Gritsan, Mikhail Kubantsev, Nhan Tran* TB Meeting 16/04/08

  2. Concept/Formalism • Each surveyed hierarchy consists of a system of points • By use of rigid body formalism, we can determine how much each object is rotated and translated. We overlay survey and reference (fiducial) systems to determine ΔR and ΔΩ • i = 1…N is the number of substructures per hiearchy • j = 1…n is the number of points per substructure • rij is the position of each point; mij is the mass of each point • drij is the difference between reference and surveyed systems

  3. Recap of Forward Pixel Survey Panel Survey Half Disk Survey • Software Hiearchy: • Module • Panel • Blade • Half Disk • Half Cylinder • Pixel Endcap • Survey Hiearchy: • Module • Panel • Half Disk (one-side) • Half Disk • Half Cylinder • Pixel Endcap Half Cylinder Survey

  4. Half Disk Level Survey • Using CMM measurements of fiducial points on modules, find displacements of: • Modules on a Panel • Panels on a Half Disk (one-side) • Used stainless steel balls as reference targets to join two sides of a Half Disk • “Finger-printing” of panels on half disk using known displacements of modules on a panel to find misidentified panels

  5. Half Disk Error Analysis Panel Toy MC Study • Errors at each hierarchy propagated by measurement uncertainties • Using Toy MC analysis, we propagate measurement uncertainties into displacement uncertainties • Module uncertainty is dominated by time/installation • Panel/Blade uncertainty dependent on the number of point surveyed Survey errors used by alignment group

  6. Results of Forward Pixel Half Disk Level Survey • RMS values for module, panel, and blade local displacements • Values considered as placement uncertainty • Given in local frame; rotations given in Euler angles

  7. Recap of Forward Pixel Survey • Surveyed Panel, Blade, Half Disk hierarchies via CMM measurements at FNAL • Survey of about 200 production panels with CMMmeasurements • Survey complete of all 8 FPix Half Disks • Error analysis at all hierarchy levels http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=17330

  8. Half Cylinder Survey • To create a half cylinder system, three sets of measurements used • Half Disk CMM measurements of sensor fiducials and 1mm phototargets for each side at FNAL • Half Disk PHG measurements of 1mm and 3mm phototargets at FNAL • Half Cylinder PHG measurements of visible 1mm and 3mm phototargets with half disks inserted at CERN • In joining measurements (1) and (2), usually are about 30 common targets (next slide) • In joining measurements (2) and (3), common targets vary between half disks (next slide)

  9. Half Cylinder Survey Common targets in creation of Half Disk System Common targets in creation of Half Cylinder System

  10. Half Cylinder Survey Results • Results for each half disk in the half cylinder • Values are presented about a point defined as the sum of the positions of the daughter modules of each half disk in the CMS global frame

  11. Forward Pixel Survey Object • A comparison of FPix Survey with Ideal Geometry • All Survey measurements for each hierarchy are compiled and applied to the CMS geometry • Results are saved to DB • A typical plot: Δr/Δz/rΔ vs. r/z/

More Related