1 / 12

Setting Up Joint Ventures:

Setting Up Joint Ventures:. How Attractive is This Option? Winter Forum on Real Estate Opportunity and Private Fund Investing January 27, 2005 The Montage • Laguna Beach, California. James Chiboucas General Counsel KBS Realty Advisors, LLC Steven C. Koppel Partner Heller Ehrman

suzanne
Download Presentation

Setting Up Joint Ventures:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Setting Up Joint Ventures: How Attractive is This Option? Winter Forum on Real Estate Opportunity and Private Fund Investing January 27, 2005 The Montage • Laguna Beach, California

  2. James Chiboucas General Counsel KBS Realty Advisors, LLC Steven C. Koppel Partner Heller Ehrman Sanford Presant National Director of Opportunity Funds Ernst & Young LLP L. Bruce Fischer Partner Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Fred Pillon Partner Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Michael Schwartz Broker George Smith Partners, Inc. Panelists

  3. Why Joint Venture The Deal? Is It Worth It? • Advantages to the Joint Venture Structure vs. Going It Alone • Increases the pool of investments available to investors • Allows investors to leverage their investments by investing in more properties • May provide operational and construction expertise to the investor • Provides property owners and/or operators with additional project equity without incurring additional debt

  4. Why Joint Venture The Deal? Is It Worth It? • Disadvantages to Joint Venture Structure vs. Going it Alone • It is often times difficult to negotiate joint venture documents from both a time and cost perspective • There is almost always a greater loss of control by all parties then expected • The operator is often times required to give a greater portion of the economic upside then desired • The investor is often times required to assume responsibility for a greater portion of the economic downside then desired

  5. Why Joint Venture The Deal? Is It Worth It? • Alternatives to the Joint Venture Structure Other Than Going It Alone • Origination of a mezzanine loan by the investor with the returns to which the investor is entitled mirroring what the investor would have received as a joint venture partner (may be easier and less costly to document then joint venture documents) • For development transactions, the entering into of a development management agreement by the developer/operator with the development fee mirroring what the developer would have received as the developer/joint venture partner

  6. Key Ingredients To Structuring The Joint Venture Transaction • Understanding the roles of each joint venture partner • Why is each joint venture partner in the deal? (capital, operational/development know how or finder of the deal) • Who is to be responsible for capital short falls? • Who is to be the operator of the property? • Who is to provide guarantees required for project financing?

  7. Key Ingredients To Structuring The Joint Venture Transaction • Alignment of interests (the transaction will only work to the extent that there is a fair and reasonable alignment of interests with respect to financial responsibility and control) • Knowing and being comfortable with your proposed joint venture partner (a joint venture relationship is like a marriage, it won’t work without a reasonable degree of trust) • Agreeing to the deal structure through the preparation of a simple, short form term sheet that sets forth the material terms of the joint venture relationship (preparation of some form of term sheet is critical to insure that there is a meeting of the minds up front)

  8. Top Ten Negotiated Provisions • Entity Governance: Member managed / management committee • Major decisions requiring member / management committee approval; restrictions on authority • Dispute resolution procedures for major decision deadlocks/disagreements • Majority vote on management committee or super vote for a member • Invoking buy/sell provisions for certain deadlocks • Deadlock: parties are just required to work it out • Pre-project acquisition approvals; pre-closing agreement

  9. Top Ten Negotiated Provisions • Degree of Control over Manager/Managing Member • Leasing activities subject to agreed upon leasing guidelines • Expenditures subject to an approved annual budget with agreed upon line item and cumulative variances • Use of Performance Hurdles

  10. Top Ten Negotiated Provisions • Responsibility for Additional Capital Contributions and Remedies for Failure to Make Additional Capital Contributions • For development transactions, imposing responsibility on manager / managing member and capping responsibility • For non-development transactions, sharing of responsibility for capital shortfalls • Remedies for failing to make required capital contributions: capital contribution loans / additional capital contribution with penalty squeeze down/triggering of default / removal

  11. Top Ten Negotiated Provisions • Distribution provisions and IRR / return calculations • Managing member’s responsibility to provide guaranties and indemnities in connection with project financing and continued liability under such guaranties and indemnities following removal • Right to remove the manager / managing member upon the occurrence of certain events • Exit strategies: forced sale of project / transferability of member interests / right of first offer in connection with sale of member interests

  12. CAN’T WE JUST GET ALONG?

More Related