1 / 10

Chapter 6:

Chapter 6:. Ontological arguments for God’s existence:. Ontological argument. Derived from the Greek terms ontos (being) and logos (reason or rational account) First developed by Saint Anselm of Canterbury, the argument takes a variety of forms

sun
Download Presentation

Chapter 6:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 6: Ontological arguments for God’s existence:

  2. Ontological argument • Derived from the Greek terms ontos (being) and logos(reason or rational account) • First developed by Saint Anselm of Canterbury, the argument takes a variety of forms • The common theme among them is that they begin a priori – proceeding from the mere concept of God – and conclude that God must exist

  3. Anselm’s ontological argument Everyone is able to understand by the term “God” a being than which none greater can be conceived So, a being than which none greater can be conceived exists in the mind (the understanding) when one hears about such a being We can conceive of a being than which none greater can be conceived which exists both in the mind and in reality

  4. Anselm’s argument continued • To exist in reality is better than to exist in the mind alone • If, therefore, a being than which none greater can be conceived exists in the mind alone and not in reality, it is not a being than which none greater can be conceived • Therefore, a being than which none greater can be conceived exists in reality.

  5. Guanilo’s objection Everyone is able to understand by the term “Perfect Island” the greatest possible island(GPI). So, a GPI exists in the mind We can conceive of a GPI that exists in the mind and reality Existence in reality is greater than existence in the mind alone If a GPI exists in the mind alone, then it is not the GPI Thus, a GPI exists in reality But since a GPI does not exist in reality, the argument structure (which Anselm also utilizes) must be flawed

  6. Kant’s objection • Existence is not a predicate such that it is a property which can be affirmed of a thing • Existence does not add to the concept of a thing; rather, existence is the instantiation of a thing • The example of a black, existing cat

  7. Plantinga’s modal argument It is possible that a being exists which is maximally great (a being we can call God) So, there is a possible world in which a maximally great being exists A maximally great being is necessarily maximally excellent in every possible world(by definition) Since a maximally great being is necessarily maximally excellent in every possible world, that being is necessarily maximally excellent in the actual world Therefore, a maximally great being exists in the actual world

  8. Objections • God’s existence is a logical or metaphysical impossibility • Possible worlds and the semantics they employ are problematic • Fairies, ghosts, gremlins and unicorns can be made “plausible” through the same argumentation (similar to “Perfect Island”)

  9. Martin’s special fairy argument It is possible that a special fairy exists So, there is a possible world in which a special fairy exists A special fairy is necessarily a tiny woodland creature with magical powers in every possible world Since a special fairy is necessarily a tiny woodland creature with magical powers in every possible world, that fairy is necessarily a tiny woodland creature with magical powers in the actual world Therefore, a special fairy exists in the actual world

  10. Questions for discussion • Is it greater to exist than to not exist, as Anselm claimed? How does your answer affect Anselm’s argument? • Can you conceive of God’s non-existence? If so, what follows from this regarding the ontological argument? • How does the ontological argument differ from other classic arguments for the existence of God?

More Related