1 / 25

300 likes | 625 Views

Chi-square test. FPP 28. More types of inference for nominal variables. Nominal data is categorical with more than two categories Compare observed frequencies of nominal variable to hypothesized probabilities One categorical variable with more than two categories

Download Presentation
## Chi-square test

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.
Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only.
Download presentation by click this link.
While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

**Chi-square test**FPP 28**More types of inference for nominal variables**• Nominal data is categorical with more than two categories • Compare observed frequencies of nominal variable to hypothesized probabilities • One categorical variable with more than two categories • Chi-squared goodness of fit test • Test if two nominal variables are independent • Two categorical variables with at least one having more than two categories • Chi-squared test of independence**Goodness of fit test**• Do people admit themselves to hospitals more frequently close to their birthday? • Data from a random sample of 200 people admitted to hospitals**Goodness of fit test**• Assume there is no birthday effect, that is, people admit randomly. Then, Pr (within 7) = = .0411 Pr (8 - 30) = = .1260 Pr (31-90) = = .3288 Pr (91+) = = .5041 • So, in a sample of 200 people, we’d expect to be in “within 7” to be in “8 - 30” to be in “31 - 90” to be in “91+”**Goodness of fit test**• If admissions are random, we expect the sample frequencies and hypothesized probabilities to be similar • But, as always, the sample frequencies are affected by chance error • So, we need to see whether the sample frequencies could have been a plausible result from a chance error if the hypothesized probabilities are true. • Let’s build a hypothesis test**Goodness of fit test**• Hypothesis • Claim (alternative hyp.) is admission probabilities change according to days since birthday • Opposite of claim (null hyp.) is probabilities in accordance with random admissions. • H0 : Pr (within 7) = .0411 Pr (8 - 30) = .1260 Pr (31-90) = .3288 Pr (91+) = .5041 • HA : probabilities different than those in H0 .**Goodness of fit test: Test statistic**• Chi-squared test statistic**Goodness of fit test: Calculate p-value**• X2 has a chi-squared distribution with degrees of freedom equal to number of categories minus 1. • In this case, df = 4 – 1 = 3.**Goodness of fit test: Calculate p-value**• To get a p-value, calculate the area under the chi-squared curve to the right of 1.397 • Using JMP, this area is 0.703. If the null hypothesis is true, there is a 70% chance of observing a value of X2 as or more extreme than 1.397 • Using the table the p-value is between 0.9 and 0.70**Goodness of fit test: Judging p-value**• The .70 is a large p-value, indicating that the difference between the observed and expected counts could well occur by random chance when the null hypothesis is true. Therefore, we cannot reject the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence to conclude that admissions rates change according to days from birthday.**Independence test**• Is birth order related to delinquency? • Nye (1958) randomly sampled 1154 high school girls and asked if they had been “delinquent”.**Sample of conditional frequencies**• % Delinquent for each birth order status • Based on conditional frequencies, it appears that youngest are more delinquent • Could these sample frequencies have plausibly occurred by chance if there is no relationship between birth order and delinqeuncy**Test of independence**• Hypotheses • Want to show that there is some relationship between birth order and delinquency. • Opposite is that there is no relationship. • H0 : birth order and delinquency are independent. • HA : birth order and delinquency are dependent.**Implications of independence**• Expected counts • Under independence, • Pr(oldest and delinquent) = Pr(oldest)*Pr(delinquent) • Estimate Pr(oldest) as marginal frequency of oldest • Estimate Pr(delinquent) as marginal frequency of delinquent • Hence, estimate Pr(oldest and delinquent) as • The expected number of oldest and delinquent, under independence, equals • This is repeated for all the other cells in table**Test of independence**• Expected counts • Next we compare the observed counts with the expected to get a test statistic**Test of independence:**• Calculate the p-value • X 2 has a chi-squared distribution with degrees of freedom:df = (number rows – 1) * (number columns – 1) • In delinquency problem, df = (4 - 1) * (2 - 1) = 3. • The area under the chi-squared curve to the right of 42.245 is less than .0001. There is only a very small chance of getting an X2as or more extreme than 42.245.**JMP output for chi-squared test**• This is a small p-value. It is unlikely we’d observe data like this if the null hypothesis is true. There does appear to be an association between delinquency and birth order.**Chi-squared test details**• Requires simple random samples. • Works best when expected frequencies in each cell are at least 5. • Should not have zero counts • How one specifies categories can affect results.**Chi-squared test items**• What do I do when expected counts are less than 5? • Try to get more data. Barring that, you can collapse categories.Example: Is baldness related to heart disease? (see JMP for data set) Baldness Disease Number of people None Yes 251 None No 331 Little Yes 165 Little No 221 Some Yes 195 Some No 185 Combine “extreme” and “much” categories Much Yes 50 Much or extreme Yes 52 Much No 34 Much or extreme No 35 Extreme Yes 2 Extreme No 1 This changes the question slightly, since we have a new category.**Chi-squared test**• for collapsed data for baldness example • Based on p-value, baldness and heart disease are not independent. • We see that increasing baldness is associated with increased incidence of heart disease.

More Related