understanding groups and teams
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Understanding Groups and Teams

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 39

Understanding Groups and Teams - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Understanding Groups and Teams. Chapter fifteen. Group. Two or more interacting and interdependent individuals who come together to achieve particular goals. Formal group—work groups defined by the organization’s structure that have designated work assignments.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Understanding Groups and Teams' - shima

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
  • Two or more interacting and interdependent individuals who come together to achieve particular goals.
    • Formal group—work groups defined by the organization’s structure that have designated work assignments.
    • Informal group—social groups that form around friendships and common interests.
examples of formal groups
Examples of Formal Groups
  • Command groups—determined by the organizational chart; composed of individuals who report directly to a given manager.
  • Task groups—composed of individuals brought together to complete a specific job task; temporary in nature.
  • Cross-functional teams—bring together knowledge and skills of individuals from various work areas.
  • Self-directed teams—essentially independent; take on managerial responsibilities such as planning, hiring, scheduling, and performance evaluations.
stages of group development
Stages of Group Development






stage 1 forming
Stage 1: Forming
  • People join the group and then define the group’s purpose, structure, and leadership.
  • Strong need for acceptance and conflict avoidance.
  • Avoid serious issues and feelings, focus on simple tasks like when to meet, who does what.
  • Individuals are gathering information and impressions about each other and the task at hand.
  • Moving from this stage requires a willingness to move from comfort zone and start discussing topics that could produce conflict.
stage 2 storming
Stage 2: Storming
  • Characterized by competition and conflict among members.
  • Accept membership in the group, but resist control that group imposes on individuality.
  • Questions arise regarding leadership, structure, rules, rewards, and evaluations.
  • Moving from this stage requires that the “rules for engagement” have been established and the tasks or responsibilities are clear and agreed.
stage 3 norming
Stage 3: Norming
  • Characterized by close relationships and cohesiveness.
  • Members understand each other better and appreciate each others’ skills and experiences.
  • Listening is high.
    • Lots of data flow and creativity.
  • Hard work to get to this stage; members may resist any changes to group.
stage 4 performing
Stage 4: Performing
  • Moved from getting to know and understand each other.
  • Characterized by interdependence and flexibility.
  • Everyone is task-oriented and people-oriented.
  • Support for experimentation in problem solving with emphasis on achievement.
  • Group identity, loyalty, and morale are high.
stage 5 adjourning
Stage 5: Adjourning
  • For temporary groups, when members are concerned with wrapping up activities rather than task performance.
  • About completion and disengagement from group tasks and group members.
class activity
Class Activity
  • Trace the development of your project team’s development through the stages of group development.
  • How closely did it parallel the group development model?
  • How might the group development model have been used to improve the group’s effectiveness?
group behavior model
Group Behavior Model








Imposed on

the Group




and Satisfaction



external conditions imposed on the group
External Conditions Imposed on the Group
  • Organization’s overall strategy
  • Authority structures
  • Formal regulations
  • Availability or absence of resources
  • Employee selection criteria
  • Organization’s performance management system
  • Organization’s culture
  • Physical layout of the group’s work space
group member resources
Group Member Resources
  • Members’ knowledge, abilities, and skills
  • Interpersonal skills
    • Conflict management and resolution
    • Collaborative problem solving
    • Communication
  • Members’ personality characteristics
    • Sociability, self-reliance, and independence tend to be positively related to productivity and morale.
    • Authoritarianism and unconventionality tend to be negatively related to productivity and morale.
group structure
Group Structure
  • Group structure influences members’ behavior.
  • Defines member roles, norms, conformity, status systems, group size, group cohesiveness, and formal leadership positions.
group structure roles
Group Structure: Roles
  • A set of behavior patterns expected of someone occupying a given position in a social unit.
  • Informal roles
    • Keeping group focused
    • Encouraging all members to contribute ideas
  • Role conflict
group structure norms
Group Structure: Norms
  • Acceptable standards or expectations shared by a group’s members.
  • Impacts work output levels, promptness, absenteeism, and socializing.
  • Effort and performance
  • Dress
  • Loyalty
group structure conformity
Group Structure: Conformity
  • Higher in collectivist cultures than in individualistic cultures.
  • Conformity to norms is high even in US.
  • Groupthink—when members feel pressure to align their opinions with others’ opinions.
group structure status
Group Structure: Status
  • Status is a prestige position.
  • Informally conferred by education, age, skill, or experience.
  • Formally conferred by organization.
    • Pay rate, office, other perks
  • Employees expect congruence between a person’s status and perks.
  • Impacts motivation.
group structure size
Group Structure: Size
  • Large groups (more than a dozen members) get better results for problem solving.
  • If goal of group is fact finding, then a larger group is more effective.
  • Small groups are faster at completing tasks than larger ones.
  • Smaller group would be better at doing something useful with the results from a fact finding group.
group structure size continued
Group Structure: Size (continued….)
  • Social loafing—tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than when working individually.
  • Happens in societies with individualistic cultures, not collectivism cultures.
group structure cohesiveness
Group Structure: Cohesiveness
  • Degree to which members are attracted to the group and share the group’s goals.
  • Relationship between cohesiveness and effectiveness is complex.
  • Cohesive groups are more aligned to the group’s goals than the organization’s goals.
group processes
Group Processes
  • Include communication patterns, group decision processes, and power dynamics, conflict interactions.
  • Group’s potential is defined by its constraints, resources, and structure.
  • Add in positive and negative process factors.
    • Positive—synergistic idea generation
    • Negative—social loafing, poor communication
two important group processes
Two Important Group Processes
  • Group decision making
  • Conflict management
decision making process
Decision Making Process
  • Identify a Problem/Opportunity
  • Identify Decision Criteria
  • Allocate Weights to Criteria
  • List Alternatives
  • Analyze Alternatives
  • Make a Decision
  • Implement Decision
  • Evaluate Decision Effectiveness
advantages of group decision making
Advantages of Group Decision Making
  • Generate more complete information and knowledge.
  • Generate more diverse alternatives.
  • Increase acceptance of the solution.
  • Increase legitimacy.
disadvantages of group decision making
Disadvantages of Group Decision Making
  • Time consuming
  • Minority domination
  • Pressure to conform
  • Ambiguous responsibility
group decision making and group size
Group Decision Making and Group Size
  • Groups of five, and to a lesser extent, seven, are most effective.
  • Odd number helps to avoid deadlocks.
techniques for more creative decision making
Techniques for More Creative Decision Making
  • Brainstorming
    • Idea generating process that encourages alternatives while withholding criticism.
  • Nominal Group Technique
    • Each member writes down his or her ideas about the problem.
    • Each member presents one idea to the group until all ideas have been presented.
    • No discussion takes place until all ideas have been presented.
group process conflict management
Group Process: Conflict Management
  • Conflict—perceived differences that result in interference or opposition.
  • Human relations view of conflict
    • Natural and inevitable
    • Not necessarily negative
    • Potential to be a positive force
  • Interactionist view of conflict
    • Some conflict is necessary for optimal performance
interactionist view of conflict
Interactionist View of Conflict
  • Functional conflicts—support a group’s goals and improve its performance.
  • Dysfunctional conflicts—prevent a group from achieving its goals.
  • Look at type of conflict to differentiate functional conflict from dysfunctional conflict.
types of conflict
Types of Conflict
  • Task conflict—relates to content and goals of the work.
  • Relationship conflict—focuses on interpersonal relationships.
  • Process conflict—refers to how work gets done.
conflict resolution techniques
Conflict Resolution Techniques


one’s own needs


an advantageous

solution for all



party giving up

something of value



placing another’s

needs above your own


from conflict





group tasks
Group Tasks
  • Complexity and interdependence of tasks influence the group’s effectiveness.
  • Simple tasks are routine and standardized.
  • Complex tasks tend to be novel.
work team
Work Team
  • Groups whose members work intensely on a specific common goal using their positive synergy, individual and mutual accountability, and complementary skills.
types of teams
Types of Teams
  • Problem-solving team
  • Self-managed team
  • Cross-functional team
  • Virtual team
creating effective teams
Creating Effective Teams
  • Clear goals
  • Relevant skills
  • Mutual trust
  • Unified commitment
  • Good communication
  • Negotiating skills
  • Appropriate leadership
  • Internal and external support