1 / 14

Field Compaction Specification Allowable Moisture Range

Field Compaction Specification Allowable Moisture Range. Soil Compaction. Moisture Density Relationship Factors Affecting Compaction Field Compaction Specification. Soil Compaction. Compaction: The artificial process of densifying a soil mass by application of mechanical energy.

sheadon
Download Presentation

Field Compaction Specification Allowable Moisture Range

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Field Compaction Specification • Allowable Moisture Range

  2. Soil Compaction • Moisture Density Relationship • Factors Affecting Compaction • Field Compaction Specification

  3. Soil Compaction • Compaction: • The artificial process of densifying a soil mass by application of mechanical energy. • Decrease in Void Ratio • Increase in Dry Density or Unit Weight • Increase in Strength • Stiffness • Bearing capacity • Reduced Settlement • Decrease in compressibility • Decrease in Permeability • Compactive Effort • Mechanical energy consumed during compaction • removes air and reorients particle • Water provides lubrication

  4. Moisture-Density Relationship • An unique relationship for a specific soil with a particular compactive effort: • Laboratory determination • Standard Proctor Test (AASHTO T 99) • Modified Proctor (AASHTO T 180) • Point of interest • Maximum Dry Density or Dry Unit Weight • Optimum Moisture Content (OMC) • Zero Air Void (ZAV) Line • Theoretical determination • Does not depend on compactive effort • No air voids • Maximum possible density at any moisture content

  5. Moisture-Density Relationship • Factors • Soil type • Moisture content • Compaction Energy

  6. Accuracy of MDD and OMC • Single Lab: • MDD 2.2 pcf • OMC 10% of mean • Multilab • MDD 4.5 pcf • OMC 15% of mean • OMC Lab1: 37% and Lab2: 43% • 15% of mean 40 is 6% OK – Muiltilab • At 40% OMC, it would be ±3% of mean

  7. Accuracy of MDD and OMC • To Reduce variability • Replicate measurements: • For three replicate measurements: • Variability would be 1/√3

  8. Influence of Moisture • Influence of Moisture • Coarse Soil – not significant • Eventually drains out • Fine Soil - significant • Increase in moisture • Reduce strength • Reduce stiffness • Decrease permeability up to OMC • Compressibility -

  9. Moisture-Density Relationship Higher Compactive Effort With such a high MC, it will never be possible to achieve this density Zero- Air-Void-Line γdry Water Content, w (%)

  10. Moisture-Density Relationship Higher Compactive Effort With such a high MC, density could only be achieved with higher compactive effort Zero- Air-Void-Line γdry Water Content, w (%)

  11. Field Compaction Specification • Density Specification • Achieve a compacted field dry unit weight of 95 or 100% of the maximum dry unit weight determined in the lab by standard proctor test • Field Density • Sand Cone • Nuclear Density Gauge

  12. Field Compaction Specification • Moisture Control – allowable range • Most agencies • Optimum ± x% (ex: 2 or 3%) • Or, Optimum ± x% point • VDOT • Optimum ± x% of optimum • (example: 20% of optimum) • Moisture Measurement • Nuclear moisture gauge • Repeated measurements – low variability

  13. 20% of OMC vs 2% point • Both similar for OMC up to 10 -15% • Mostly coarse soils • Influence of moisture is minimum • High OMC • Fine Soil • Very sensitive to moisture • Significantly influences • Strength and stiffness

  14. 20% of OMC vs 2% point • High OMC - example 40% • 20% of Optimum – range ±8% (32% to 48%) • Wide range • Close to 100% saturation or even more • High Compactive effort - Weaker soil • 2% point – range ±2% (38% to 42%) • Is it too restrictive? • What has historically been achieved in the field • Better quality subgrade

More Related