1 / 19

Collaboration for Cardiac Safety Research in Children: CSRC View

Learn about the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium (CSRC) and their mission to address therapeutic innovation and cardiac safety in children. Discover the collaborative efforts, partnerships, and consensus-building initiatives to enhance pediatric cardiac safety research.

searly
Download Presentation

Collaboration for Cardiac Safety Research in Children: CSRC View

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Collaboration, Cardiac Safety And Children:The Cardiac Safety Research Consortium (CSRC) View Mitchell W. Krucoff, MD, FACC Professor, Medicine/Cardiology Duke University Medical Center Director, Cardiovascular Devices Unit Co-Director, CSRC Duke Clinical Research Institute

  2. Cardiac Safety Research Consoritum (CSRC) Mission, who we are, how we work

  3. Addressing Therapeutic Innovation in the USA 2004 R&D Spending & New Rx Applications 10 Year Trends http://www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/criticalpath/

  4. Cardiac Safety in Regulatory Science: Rare but catastrophic events 2006 FDA-Duke MOU Cardiac Safety Research Consortium

  5. NEUTRAL GROUND • COMMITMENT • ADM. INFRASTRUCTURE: • HELP ESTABLISH WG/SC • CONTRACTS MGNT • COORDINATE MEETINGS • FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT The CSRC Public-Private Partnership MODEL FDA INDUSTRY Mortara Instrument CRADA ACADEMIA PT. GROUPS PUBLIC-PRIVATE CONSORTIUM DCRI MOU PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS PPP STEERING COMMITTEES WORKING GROUPS NON-PROFIT STATE, OTHER • IDENTIFY MUTUAL PRORITIES • POOL RESOURCES/EXPERTISE • DEFINE ROLES/RESPONSIBILITIES • GAP ANALYSES (WHAT’S KNOWN?) • CO-DEVELOPPROPOSALS • BUDGETS • TIMELINES • RFPs IMPLEMENT PROJECTS

  6. Partnering Organizations • DIA • HESI • ACC-NCDR • ICOS • NIH • AHA • FDA • Health Canada • PMDA Japan

  7. Member Companies 2016 • Monebo • MortaraInsrument • Merck • Nabios GmbH • OBS Medical • Perspective Informatics • Pfizer, Inc • Portola • Quintiles • Roche • Salix • Sanofi Aventis • Takeda • Taylor Microtech • Vince & Associates • Abbott • AbbVie • AliveCor • Amgen • AMPS • Astra Zeneca • AlCor • Bayer • Bioclinica • Biomedical Systems • BoehringerIngelheim • Cardiocore • CardioNet • Celerion • Chiesi Pharma • CytoVas • Dabi, Ltd • Daiichi • Duck Flats Pharma • Eli Lilly • Epidemico • Gilead Sciences • G.E. Health Care • Global Instrumentation • GlaxoSmithKline • InVivoSciences • Johnson & Johnson • Medifacts • Medpace • Medtronic • Merck

  8. CSRC Basics • Regulatory mission: CV safety concerns • Unique partnership of stakeholders • Dialogue • Collaboration & trust • Consensus • Thinktank/incubators: • To talk and to listen • To do….

  9. CSRC Consensus White Papers

  10. CSRC 2006-2016 Ten Year Report

  11. Pediatric Drug & Device Safety: 2010 A Complex Equipoise

  12. Complexities of Pediatric Safety:“Normal” from conception thru adolescence • A matrix of change: • Growth • Metabolic • Hormonal • Psychosocial development • Exercise and exertion • Drugs and devices • On-target and off-target effects • Ethical considerations & research (consent)

  13. September 30, 2014 NCAA Cardiac Task Force MeetingIndianapolis September 23-24, 2014

  14. Technology use • False positives • False negatives • Additional testing • Developmental impact • Quality • Cost Maron B et al, Circulation. 2014;130:1303-1334 Lawless C et al, JACC. 2014;60:2146-71

  15. CSRC Consensus Focus on Pediatric Safety:Unmet needs for screening & for therapeutic innovations • Defining “normal” • Most kids screened are normal variants • Enhanced definition of normal enhance detection of abnormal (sensitivity & specificity) • “Normal” kids is an information signature, not a single technology • Understanding “normal” in kids requires follow-up

  16. CSRC: Developing consensus in place of contention • Start with what’s easiest: • To agree upon • To do • Tolerate imperfection • Listen for what we can do together that no one of us could do alone

  17. Screening: what can we all easily agree to? • Screening programs are active nationally: • Private foundations • Academic centers • NCAA • Primary “flaw” in national screening: inconsistency • We can do better working together than any one can do separately • What’s good for screening (normals) is good for regulatory • We can get better without being perfect

  18. What could we make better (not “perfect”)? • Automate technology wherever possible • Blood pressure • ECG • Echo • Lower cost, higher consistency data • Enhance consistency of data content/structure across actice screening efforts • Define contemporary, age-related “normals” criteria • Automate follow-up wherever possible • I-phone apps • EHR For insight into “healthy”

  19. Collaboration, Cardiac Safety And Children:The Cardiac Safety Research Consortium (CSRC) View Mitchell W. Krucoff, MD, FACC Professor, Medicine/Cardiology Duke University Medical Center Director, Cardiovascular Devices Unit Co-Director, CSRC Duke Clinical Research Institute

More Related