160 likes | 266 Views
Join Dr. Bankhead, Graduate Program Director, as she shares insights from the MSW Convocation Check-In. Discover the nuances of transitioning to graduate education, including faculty teaching styles, academic expectations, and common challenges encountered by new students. Gain an understanding of academic standards, the advancement to candidacy process, and innovative alternatives to traditional thesis projects. This discussion aims to prepare incoming graduate students for a rewarding experience and foster a supportive academic community.
E N D
MSW I Convocation Check-In Dr. Bankhead, Graduate Program Director January 28, 2011 bankhead@csus.edu
How was your first semester? • Experience with the teaching styles of faculty • Received grades - know what is expected • Anxiety level is probably reduced • Began 72; 26 in 3 year cohort – roughly 100 students entering into final year • Differences in graduate education – depth, student colleagues, student driven • Challenging to work, engage in field and do well academically • Challenges with course substitutes b/c of the nature of program • Less hospitality to graduate students at university level • Fewer choices in classes, electives, sections, etc. than accustomed to as undergraduates
Advancement to Candidacy • Acknowledged by University as a contract • If changes made to advisor, electives, course work, requires a “petition for exception” to change • If you change educational contract (ie. Sequencing of classes) that results in additional semester or year, requires petition to change • If conditions for admission not met – advancement to candidacy will be denied. ( BA/BS, less than 3.0 in 1st semester). • If you do not have your undergraduate degree – will be dropped from all rolls and need to reapply • In past we accepted, but now not so clear…… reduction in spaces on this campus for graduate students
Academic Standards • Field Professionalism • Academic Standards – 3 C policy • Must maintain a 3.0; Cannot receive more than 2 Cs or lower • Academic probation if below 3.0 • Academic Disqualification when on probation and/or GPA is .9 or more points below 3.0 • Also when a student receives 3 or more “C” grades during their graduate studies
Disqualification & Reinstatement • Administrative-Academic Probation/Disqualification • Withdrawal from most of courses in 2 successive semesters in 3 terms • Repeated failure to progress toward degree • Must satisfy a deficient grade in a sequence course before moving on (204 abcd, 235 a, 295 abcd, 250/51) • Must pass 210 and advance to candidacy before beginning 500 or thesis/project/culminating experience • Leave of Absence – medical, maternity, military, planned educational leaves
Grade Appeal • Grade Appeals – • 1) student/instructor, • 2) student/director 6th week following semester, • 3) student/director/instructor possible • Student grade appeal form & panel with student member
Pupil Personnel Credential Coursework • Summer work and more costly per unit, however operated with fewer students. • College of Continuing Education (CCE)
Thesis Alternative Dr. Bankhead MRP 4017 bankhead@csus.edu
Piloting Alternative to Traditional Thesis • 2 courses instead of guided study • 296A Advanced Methods of Evaluating Practice • 296B Social Work Graduate Capstone • Dr. Bankhead – Saturday class (20 students) • Dr. Antonyappan – Thursday evenings (20 students)
Decision to develop an alternative • Interest in stronger exp. with research methods/tools/stats • Possibility for deeper, classroom guided learning to evaluate practice once graduate • Challenges with SW 500 for some learners • Structure/absence of class meeting • Isolation/independence • Learning style • Budget issues - labor intensive for faculty
Comparable Alternatives • Students requested this alternative and faculty responded to the request • Comparable academic rigor • Piloted form all professor’s teaching 296a/b also teach 500 for the personal experience/opportunity to reflect on differences and challenges • Same song played with a different instrument
Sign Up for Traditional Culminating Experience or Alternative • Meet with a thesis advisor or email professor to explore that option • Sign a special VORTA form • Do student’s think they know which option they want? • Are you flexible?
Self-assessment Considerations for Option • 20 students • Equivalent to SW500 in demand and rigor • Work well with the structure of a regular class • Strong student academically • Interest in quantitative analysis • Not wed to a particular topic for project • Group work • Flexibility during the pilot year
Organization of SW296A Advanced Methods of Evaluating Practice • SW 296A Advanced Research Methods course with a focus on practice evaluation • Fall semester • Must receive a B in 210 • Begins with question of how to evaluate practice and which tools to use • Extension of 210 in terms of methods; chi-square, t-tests, ANOVA, multivariate concepts • Offers a deepened investigation of the evaluation methods and appropriateness of their use b/c not first exposure • Interactive – group work with student colleagues • Lab work • Guest speakers from field with living laboratory research possibilities
SW296B Social Work Research Capstone • SW 212: Capstone Project • Spring semester • Group projects • Expedited human subjects review • Organized around similar group and faculty interests • Integrated paper as a result, not filed in library or with grad. studies, no more than 2 students working on each – less choice in research topic • Community service, secondary data, …