Welcome to MLRA Soil Survey Office Leader’s Orientation Seminar April 15 – 17, 2008

1. Welcome to MLRA Soil Survey Office Leader’s Orientation Seminar April 15 – 17, 2008 Hosted by MO-13 and the NSSC

2. MLRA Soil Survey Region 13 MLRA Soil Survey Office Leader Orientation Seminar Net Meeting April 15 – 17, 2008

3. Seminar Objectives • When you complete this seminar you will: • Identify the MO-13 staff and their areas of expertise • Be aware of standard Operating Procedures for MO-13 • Have a basic understanding of MLRA Implementation Plan • Understand Agency’s soil survey restructuring plan • Be able to prepare annual, project, and long-range plans • Be aware of new technology • Identify the Board of Directors and their function

4. Seminar Assumptions The information presented here is based on the assumption that all MLRA Offices are operating with the initial soil survey completed and have certified SSURGO data to use

5. Meet the MO Staff Currently have six professionals on staff to serve the MLRA SSO: • Data Quality/Correlation/NASIS Support • Geospatial Support • Web Publishing and English Edit • Data Quality/Correlation/Geomorphology • Forestry

6. Front Desk Laura McLane MO-13 Secretary 304-284-7593 Laura.mclane@wv.usda.gov

7. Soil Data Quality - NASIS David Kingsbury Soil Data Quality Specialist Acting NASIS Coordinator 304-284-7589 david.kingsbury@wv.usda.gov

8. Geospatial Support Tim Prescott GIS Specialist 304-284-7590 Timothy.prescott@wv.usda.gov

9. Soil Data Quality - Geomorphology Mike Jones Soil Data Quality Specialist 304-284-7588 Michael.jones@wv.usda.gov

10. Editing and Publishing Services Debbie Chase GIS Specialist-Publications 304-284-7568 debbie.chase@wv.usda.gov Suzie Meierdierks English Editor 402-437-5504 Suzann.meierdierks@lin.usda.gov

11. Forestry Through a 70/30 percent staff share agreement with Virginia, we are able to offer forestry assistance to all MLRA offices Don Flegel Soil Data Quality/Forester Harrisonburg, VA 540-434-1404x122 donald.flegel@va.usda.gov

12. MO-13 Leader Steve Carpenter 304-284-7585 stephen.carpenter@wv.usda.gov

13. Some Basic Fundamentals • Technical Soil Services will be provided through the state office structure with leadership provided by the state soil scientist

14. Some Basic Fundamentals • State Conservationists have the responsibility within their states for the administrative support of the MLRA soil survey offices

15. Some Basic Fundamentals • MLRA SSO activities are coordinated by the MLRA Regional Office (MO) under the leadership of the MO Leader in partnership with states, NCSS partners.

16. Some Basic Fundamentals • MO Office emphasis will be on delivering a regionally consistent database both attribute and spatial via the Web Soil Survey

17. What we will discuss today: • Standard Operating Procedures • Implementation Guidelines • Planned Operations • Management by MLRA

18. Some Basic Fundamentals Standard Operating Procedures “The Way we Do Business”

19. 3 Levels of Coordination in the Restructured Program • MO Board of Directors • MO Management Team • MLRA Technical Team

20. Who are they? Kevin Wickey, WV, Chair Craig Derickson, PA Tom Drewes, NJ Jon Hall, MD Russell Morgan, DE Jack Bricker, VA Terry Cosby, OH Mike Hubbs, KY Kevin Brown, TN Board of Directors

21. Board of Directors • What do they do? • Approve Staff • Recommend Budgets to RAC • Approve Offices • Approve Plans • Meet Annually

22. MO Management Team • Comprised of State Soil Scientists in region • Coordinate implementation in their state • Work with state and local partners • Supervise MLRA Office Leaders in their state

23. MO Management Team • Who are they? • Rich Gehring-OH • Bill Craddock-KY • David Kriz-VA • Ed White-PA • Ron Taylor-NJ • Jim Brown-MD • Diane Shields-DE • Doug Slabaugh-TN

24. MLRA Technical Team • Made up of MLRA Office Leader, MLRA office staff, MO soil data quality specialist, and the resource soil scientists • Develops all appropriate plans (Long Range, Annual, and Project)

25. MLRA Soil Survey Areas Managing soil survey mapping funds in area of responsibility Responsible for goal setting and progress reporting Supervision of soil survey staff Statewide Soil Survey management team (Guidance and support to all MLRA SSOs within state) Field Office Tech Guide Technical Soil Services Program Support State Soil Scientist Roles in the New MLRA Soil Survey Office Structure

26. MO Office has responsibility for: Quality AssuranceProviding standards, review, and training support for all phases of the soil survey Providing guidance to MLRASSO on data collection, analysis, mapping techniques, map unit design and naming, soil classification, legend management, NASIS data population, and overall anagement of the soil survey

27. MO Office has responsibility for: QA on: OSDs and SC databases, spatial data, MLRA correlation guidelines, on soil temperature and moisture regimes; and, coordinating the collection of soil survey related soil characterization in the region

28. MLRA Project Leader Has Responsibility for: MLRA Soil Survey Areas • Managing soil survey operations ensuring standards are met (quality control) • Conducting the survey including field data collection, investigation, and maintaining the soil data for the geographic area • Supervision of soil survey staff

29. MLRA Project Leader Has Responsibility for: • Ensuring accuracy of line placement with respect to landforms. • Ensuring the accuracy and consistency of the soil map unit attribute data. • Ensuring that soil series are mapped regionally on appropriate parent materials and landforms. • Georeferencing locations of sampled soil profiles and ensuring adequate representation of soil series by laboratory data. • Quantifying distribution and extent of designated benchmark soils.

30. Part One Any Questions a this point?

31. Implementation Guides • Examples in Notebook • Two Phase Process • Evaluation and Maintenance of our current spatial and propertydatabase; and, • Enhancement for future users

32. Evaluation and Maintenance • A Seven Step Process 1. The Initial Evaluation 2. The Benchmark Soil Review 3. The OSD Review 4. Applying Soil Taxonomy 5. The Database 6. Organization of Existing Data; and, 7. GIS Applications (the springboard for future work)

33. Enhancement • A Six Step Process 1. The Planning Process 2. Revising the Spatial Data, where required 3. Revising Existing Soil Properties (Super Seven) 4. Establish New Data Elements 5. Develop New Interpretations; and, 6. Miscellaneous Issues

34. Evaluation and Maintenance Step One: The Initial Evaluation 1. The Legend • Our current subset legends were developed over two generations of county soil survey correlations. This has resulted in inconsistencies in naming similar landscapes in adjacent surveys. Many inconsistencies in these legends can be resolved with a comprehensive review of MLRA subset legends. • The MO recommends that all MLRA Soil Survey Leaders undertake a thorough review of their subset legends to identify problem map units, landscapes, or data. This evaluation will create an inventory of “soil survey issues” that will later be prioritized and addressed via project plans. • For example, a review of the legends in MLRA-126 identified the need for update work in several “pre-taxonomy surveys”. The project office developed a project plan and set goals for their work in 2008. The update survey was improved by correlating by physiographic areas.

35. Evaluation and Maintenance Step Two: The Benchmark Soil Review • Review and evaluation of Benchmark soils is an Agency priority. Guidance has been provided by the NSSC on processes to review the current Benchmark soil list (issue paper, Tom Reedy and others). The NCSS has provided excellent guidance in reviewing Benchmark soils. Most evaluations will extend the concept of benchmark soils to the landscape catena and will include comprehensive data mining to compile information related to the benchmark and associated soils. • The MO recommends each MSSO evaluate their current Benchmark soils and make recommendations for changes. The MO will coordinate efforts among MSSOs. This review should include an evaluation of a “data completeness index” as described by the NSSC.

36. Evaluation and Maintenance Step Three: The OSD Review Revision and maintenance of OSDs is primarily the responsibility of MSSOs. We urge all MSSOs to initiate a plan to systematically review and revise the OSDs in their MLRA(s). This review should prioritize the OSDs and work should begin on benchmark and extensive series or soils involved in on-going MLRA work. It is recommended that each MSSO develop an OSD maintenance plan as part of their long range plan. This should include the review of a specific number of series annually. MO-13 will assign series responsibility to individual MSSOs.

37. Evaluation and Maintenance Step Three: The OSD Review (continued) • At a minimum, the following items should be addressed (see NSSH for additional guidance): • a) determine if the pedon is representative for that series (high importance) • b) review the Range in Characteristics • c) review the Competing Series (update this section in the competing series also) • d) review the Associated Series (update this section in the associated series also) • e) review the Geographic Setting • f) review Remarks Section; add statements concerning any diagnostic features • g) update to 2 meters (if possible) • h) convert to metric

38. Evaluation and Maintenance Step Four: The Application of Soil Taxonomy • MLRA Soil Survey Offices have the responsibility for evaluating Soil Taxonomy. We realize that Soil Taxonomy is fairly stable in the MO-13 Region; however, MSSOs need to identify any issues affecting Soil Taxonomy and help collect appropriate documentation to support revisions. Several issues affecting soils in the MO have been identified, including: a) recognizing anthropogenic induced change in soils subaqueous soils mine-land reclamation drainage extent and spatial variation of compaction in minesoils b) CEC activity class c) soil moisture and temperature regimes d) horizon criteria; including the usefulness of subgroups

39. Evaluation and Maintenance Step Five: The Database • Database activities have been separated into two distinct categories: a. Integrity and management of site and legend objects; and, b. Properties and interpretations (the update of soil property and interpretive data). • More on this tomorrow

40. Evaluation and Maintenance Step Six: Organization of the Data The establishment of MSSOs in the restructured soil survey program has created the opportunity for these offices to become clearinghouses for all soil survey information for their assigned MLRAs. This can lead to the consolidation and compilation of soil survey data currently housed at various locations. Centralizing this information will leave a legacy the next generation of soil scientists will appreciate. This data will also make positive contributions and improve the efficiency of projects.

41. Evaluation and Maintenance Step Seven: GIS Applications • Along with compiling existing hard copy data, an inventory of existing digital/GIS data will be essential for these new survey offices. The MO provided a digital “basic cartographic set” which includes SSURGO, roads, hydrography, geology, strongly recommends that each MSSO query GIS sources to develop an inventory of existing data such as ground water, aquifers, land use, geology, STATSGO, etc. Because digital data files can be large, many SOs have developed protocol for storage. It is important that a formal structure is used so data can be easily accessed, updated, protected • The MO recommends that a series of resource maps be developed for each MLRA. These maps could highlight conservation or resource issues

42. Enhancement • A Six Step Process 1. The Planning Process 2. Revising the Spatial Data, where required 3. Revising Existing Soil Properties (Super Seven) 4. Establish New Data Elements 5. Develop New Interpretations; and, 6. Miscellaneous Issues

43. Step One:The Planning Process • Our update work will be centered on the planning process outlined in NSSH Part 608 • Priorities determined by input from MLRA Technical Team and MO, SO, and National objectives

44. Long Range Plan of Operations • Describes what is required to bring surveys up to common modern standard. • Within context of MLRA Region-wide MOU • Based on ‘evaluations’ (needs list)

45. Annual (Business) Plan • Agency Policy is to have Business Plans • Follow guidance in GM 340.401 ‘Business Planning’. • Will contain specifics for completing a portion of the current Project Plan. • Milestones and actions • Timeframes and responsibilities • Progress and status.

46. The Project Plan • Describes work to be accomplished in about 2-5 year period to meet 1 or more highest priority needs. • Requires a prioritization process • Requires consensus by “Technical Team” • SSS’s, MO Leader, MLRA SSO Leader, Cooperating Agencies, Others as appropriate. • Requires concurrence by STC’s/Partners • Should be reflected in host-STC goals.

47. The Annual and Project Plan • All Seven MLRA Offices in MO-13 should have plans ready for approval by September 1, 2008 for 2009 • These will be presented to the BOD in September for approval • What do you want to get accomplished?

48. Step Two: Revising the Spatial Data • MO-13 will not support traditional means of updating soil surveys unless approved by NHQ Soil Division Director • No starting over from scratch

49. Step Two: Revising the Spatial Data • New technology will be employed to evaluate and correct current data: • Unify slope breaks • Better delineate erosion and deeply dissected areas • Be more consistent in map units across a given area • Statistically evaluate soil variability • Utilize data provided • More on Thursday

50. Step 3: Revising Soil Properties • Focus on the “Super Seven” • Organic Matter • pH • CEC • AWC • PSA • Db • Ksat