290 likes | 559 Views
E N D
1. IP VALUATION AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER MECHANISM IN PRACTICE Case: Indonesian Institute of Sciences Bambang Subiyanto
Center for Innovation
Indonesian Institute of Sciences
2. IP Perception in Indonesia: High cost
Time consuming either to process or to market
Open confidential information to public (high risk to pirate/infringe/fake)
Weak law enforcement
3. Applied Patent up to September 2009
4. Cooperation Work
5. The Role of The Center for Innovation Center for Innovation undertakes duty as followed:
Managing LIPI’s Intellectual Property Rights
Promoting and facilitating collaboration between LIPI and Stakeholders (private sector/SMEs)
Investigating aspects relating to Technology Innovation Management
6. IP Protection and Management Services provide:
Drafting the specification of patent document
Patent searching
Processing IP protection to Indonesia Patent Office
Translating patent document
Developing IPR database
7. E-Learning on IPR To increase scientists’ knowledge skills on IPR
To utilize ICT as learning method
To bridge the gap between IPR and Scientists/Community
To pioneer of IPR development in nationwide
8. Training on Patent Drafting and E-Learning on IPR Objective
To equip scientists with essential skill and knowledge in composing and developing specification of patent document
To enhance IPR awareness
To generate LIPI’s IPR
10. The Advantage of IP System
12. Inventor Dreams
13. Project Selection of S&T Commercialization
14. Project selection of S&T commercialization
15. The Relation of IPR and Technology Transfer
16. PRIVATE SECTOR SCIENTIFICALLY PROVE
TARGET MARKET
INFORMATION OF VALUE OF CAPITAL REQUIRED
INFORMATION ON COST OF GOODS SOLD
SUSTAIN OF RAW MATERIAL SUPPORT
PRODUCT GUARANTIE
QUALITY OF PRODUCT
AFTER SALES SERVICE
17. LIPI OUTCOMES(SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY)
Are those ready to get down in the market?
18. CATEGORY OF LIPI’S RESEARCH OUTCOME Low: Prototype (OK); Specification (?)
19. Category 2
20. Category 3 Superb: Prototype (OK); Specification (OK), Tech (?) Econ(?)
21. 21
22. 22 A. Syringe Needle destroyer
B. Phototheraputic of TL UVB Ray
C. Bird Strike
D. Water Meter Callibration
E. Hummer Mill
F. Ozon generator(Waste Processing)
G. Multi path antenna
H. Posiblen Pesicorn process sequenced by micro organism
I. Monascus: Cholesterol slash
J. Human Erythropoeitin (hEPO)– eryth form K. Hydrogen of electricy and transport system
L. Fuel Cell
M. Electric Fuel Treatment (EFT)
N. Sel Surya (Solar Cell)
O. Cyclon burner – turbulence: fledgling cooper
P. VCO cooking oil
Q. Tempe Ice Cream
R. Palm Surfactant
S. Electricity boggy moving system (Marlip)
Sitem Penggerak Mobil Listrik (Marlip)
T. Mikorisa Fertilizer**
23. Relation of R&D outcome and Demand of Industry (A-B-G) ?
24. POLICY DRAWBACK Return from IP Commercialization could be directly use
The value of Royalty is based on license value
Royalty is consider as a credit for inventor/creator
Need distinctive regulation to operate this policy
Return form IP should be go to state treasurer
The value of royalty is follow the decree
Inventor/creator appropriatly leasn to the country so royalty is the right of the state
Expenditure mechanism is lean to the regulation of Government Income and Expenditure Budget
25. 25 Desain Unit Pengolah Limbah Cair
26. 26 Incubator of Small Business in Manufacturing and Healthcare Industries based on Ozon Reactor
28. REGIONAL STATUS:Cibinong Science Center
29. REGIONAL STATUS