1 / 72

Options in Legal Decision-Making

Options in Legal Decision-Making. Attorney Kate Schilling GWAAR Elder Law & Advocacy Center September 2019. Core concepts. WI is not a next-of-kin or “family consent” state Need legal authority to act on another’s behalf. Legal authority. From a person: Power of attorney document

rothermel
Download Presentation

Options in Legal Decision-Making

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Options in Legal Decision-Making Attorney Kate Schilling GWAAR Elder Law & Advocacy Center September 2019

  2. Core concepts • WI is not a next-of-kin or “family consent” state • Need legal authority to act on another’s behalf

  3. Legal authority • From a person: • Power of attorney document • Authorized representative for a benefit • From a court: • Guardianship action • Personal representative (executor)

  4. Current formal tools for people who need help with decisions

  5. Representative payee • Can be solely for SSA funds • Payee must be approved by SSA • POA or guardianship order not sufficient • Or can be for all of the person’s income and assets • Fiscal Assistance in Dane County • Organizational rep payees can be paid (~$45/month)

  6. Conservatorship • Voluntary • No determination of competency • Someone else to pay bills and manage money • Typically has powers and duties of guardian of estate

  7. Power of attorney • Legal contract • Gives chosen person(s) • Authority to act on one’s behalf • Agent must act in accordance with person’s wishes

  8. Power of Attorney forms • State form POA-F or POA-HC • Five Wishes • Honoring Choices (various languages) • Documents privately drafted by an attorney

  9. POA-HC Authority of Agent • Oversee healthcare & medical issues • Admit to a NH • Make treatment decisions • Pick doctors • Consent to surgery • End of life issues

  10. POA-F Authority of Agent • Manage/buy/sell property • File taxes • Pay bills, manage bank accounts • Sign a lease • Oversee business assets • Manage insurance • Claims litigation • Coordinate and apply for public benefits (Wis. Stat. 244.54)

  11. POA-F Agent Authority Limitations Powers not included unless expressly and clearly stated: • Create/amend/revoke/terminate a trust (Wispact) • Gifting • Change a will, rights of survivorship, or beneficiary designation • Delegate authority granted under the power of attorney

  12. Special Note about Benefits • POA-F agents have the ability to sign the principal up for benefits and manage insurance. • Per the current MEH 2.5.1., the people who can sign are: • Guardians of the Estate • Authorized Representatives • POA-F agents

  13. POA—Standard for decisions • Agent must follow expressed wishes of principal • If unknown, best interest standard • Agent cannot supplant his opinion in place of principal’s

  14. Execution requirements– POA-F • Signed by the principal, OR • Signed by another adult upon the principal's direction and his or her “conscious presence” Strongly recommended to be notarized

  15. Execution requirements– POA-HC • Dated, in writing, signed by principal, and • Signed in presence of 2 witnesses • Witnesses must not be: • related by blood or marriage • under age 18 • health care workers (exception for SW and hospital chaplain) • expected to inherit under will/trust/life insurance, etc. • the agent

  16. Activation Agent’s authority is activated either: • Immediately • Upon later incapacity Agent’s authority always terminates upon death

  17. Activation of POA When does agent’s authority start? Power of attorney authority incapacity death today

  18. POA Activation-Considerations Now Upon disability “Springing” Keeps it private Reduces risk of unauthorized use • Upon execution of docs • Convenience--banking • Travel or leave country • No court oversight

  19. POA Co-agents • Co-agents = two people have the authority at the same time • Independent authority? • Both needed sign every single check? • Co-agents are allowed for POA-F (not allowed for POA-HC) • Co-agents are typically not recommended Instead, utilize alternate agent or successor agent in the event first person is unwilling or unable to act.

  20. Revocation of POA • Person can revoke at any time (Wis. Stat. 155.40) • Draft and sign short statement revoking agent’s authority and provide copies of statement to appropriate parties, including the agent • Revoke by tearing it up or burning document (& all copies) • Execution of new POAF does not automaticallyrevoke prior POA-F, unless expressly stated. • Execution of new POA-HC does revoke prior one.

  21. Review the conduct of a POA agent • Petition to Review the Conduct of an Agent--file with the court • Court can order return of money, assets • Court can remove the agent • Wis Stats. 244.16 & 244.17

  22. POA usually sufficient • No court involvement • Low cost • You pick your agent • You decide what rights • Reflects person’s own wishes . . . BUT

  23. A POA cannot • Keep person in a nursing home against her wishes • Admit/hold a person in a locked unit • Write a will on behalf of the principal • Change beneficiary designations • Appoint a new agent • Create a special needs trust (unless expressly stated)

  24. Exception - Wis. Stat. 50.06 • Exception to need for guardianship and PP • Family members can consent to admission to rehab facility • Person must come directly from hospital

  25. Guardianship is a legal relationship created by the court

  26. Guardianship Legal relationship created by court

  27. Preliminary matters. . . • Presumption of competency in adults • Guardianship is not an extension of parenthood • Guardianship is only necessary when lesser restrictive alternatives are insufficient or not appropriate (POA, rep payee, etc.)

  28. Incompetency is NOT: • Physical disability • Mere old age • Eccentricity • Poor judgment Wis Stat. 54.10(3)(b)

  29. Incompetency-legal standard Incapacity to activate a POA • Inability to receive, evaluate, and communicate decisions. • And qualifying impairment or disability • Risk of physical/financial harm • Needs cannot be met by lesser alternative

  30. Who can petition for a guardianship? • Immediate family members • POA • NH • Hospital • County (APS, Corporation Counsel) • Other interested persons

  31. Guardianship is a court process • Legal finding of incompetency • Court chooses guardian • Court decides authority • Best interest standard • Takes 1-3 months

  32. Role of attorneys • Petitioner’s atty: bring forth the guardianship action, sometimes represents proposed guardian • Guardian ad litem: advocate for best interest standard, eyes and ears of court • Advocacy counsel: opposes guardianship, advocates for wishes of proposed ward

  33. Due Process Rights of proposed ward • Be at the hearing • Oppose the guardianship • Advocacy counsel • Cross examination • Closed hearing • Trial by a jury

  34. Ward’s right to be at hearing • Ward has a right to be at the hearing. • Petitioner must ensure ward’s attendance at hearing (unless waived by GAL). • Ward, GAL, or advocacy counsel may request that the guardianship hearing be held at a hospital room, nursing home, or similar pursuant location under Wis. Stat. 54.44 (4)(a)

  35. POA & Guardianship Court can: • Keep POA in place with guardianship • Revoke POA authority entirely

  36. Guardianship KEEP POA AGENT REMOVE AGENT Bad judgment Misappropriation of funds Untrustworthy • Reflection of the person’s own wishes • Less restrictive

  37. POA agents are preferred guardians • The court shall appoint as G of E the agent under POA-F, unless not in best interests of the proposed ward. • The court shall appoint as G of P the agent under POA-HC, unless not in best interests of the proposed ward. • Wis. Stats. 54.15 (2) and (3)

  38. Types of guardians • Family member or friend • Volunteer guardian • Corporate guardian (see DHS 85) • Paid guardian, but not regulated by DHS

  39. Guardianship hearing • Judge (or jury) decides with input from GAL • Burden of proof is clear and convincing evidence • Doctor provides report and testimony • Social worker report and testimony (if PP) • County procedure varies slightly

  40. Guardianship--timeframes Temporary “Permanent” In place long-term Until challenged or removed • Can get within 1-3 weeks • Lasts 60 days • Can extend another 60 days* *After this, a court loses jurisdiction to order a guardianship for the next 90 days.

  41. Guardian of Person Estate • Make medical decisions • Find appropriate housing • Arrange for in-home supports • Help access DVR or vocational coach • Pay bills • Manage bank accounts, invest money • Sign a lease • Sign a cell phone contract • Apply for public benefits --54.20(3)(e)

  42. Powers of a Guardian • Guardian only has powers authorized by court order or statute • All other powers and authority are retained by the ward • Always check the paperwork! • Order for Guardianship • Letters of Guardianship • NOT the petition for Guardianship

  43. Guardian—Standard for decision making • Best interest standard ***Strong consideration given to ward’s preferences • Fiduciary duty • Reasonable and prudent person • Diligence and good faith

  44. Current WI law requirements Guardian of person shall • “place the least possible restriction on the individual’s personal liberty and exercise of statutory rights, and promote the greatest possible integration of the individual into his or her community.” • Wis. stat. §54.25 (2)(d) 3.b

  45. Current WI law requirements Guardian of estate • shall “provide a ward with the greatest amount of independence and self-determination with respect to property management in light of ward’s functional level, understanding. . . personal wishes and preferences. . .” • WI stat §54.19, see also §54.20

  46. Potential issues (not addressed in paperwork) • Dignity of Risk • Issues with sexuality • Balancing health & safety concerns with right to association (friendships) • Considering ward’s preferences when making decisions

  47. BALANCING Self-determination Protection

  48. Decisions contrary to ward’s wishes In making a decision contrary to the ward’s expressed wishes, guardian shall take into account: • Understanding of the nature and consequences of the decision • Level of risk involved • Value of the oppty for the individual to develop decision making skills • And the need of the individual for a wider experience Wis. Stats. 54.25

  49. Guardians exceeding authority Generally speaking, a guardian does not have authority to: • Limit visitors or friends or phone calls • Limit expression of religion • Limit right to file grievances or consult with advocacy agencies • Restricting personal choices like clothing, time go to bed, haircuts Ward retains ability to express preferences for activities, friendships, and social outings

  50. Review Conduct of Guardian • Failing to file inventory or accounting • Fraud, waste, mismanagement • Self-dealing or gifting • Failure to provide for needs of ward, including applying for public benefits • Failing to act in best interest • Other: exceeding authority of guardian See Wis. Stat. § 54.68

More Related