1 / 16

STREGA & STEP Surveys

STREGA & STEP Surveys. V. Ripepi INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Napoli. Introduction and Overview. STREGA & STEP are surveys in the context of INAF-OACN GTO Small and focused surveys STREGA STEP Requirements/Data reduction plans.

ronni
Download Presentation

STREGA & STEP Surveys

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. STREGA & STEP Surveys V. Ripepi INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Napoli

  2. Introduction and Overview • STREGA & STEP are surveys in the context of INAF-OACN GTO • Small and focused surveys • STREGA • STEP • Requirements/Data reduction plans

  3. STREGA@VSTSTRructure and Evolution of the GAlaxy P.I.: Marcella Marconi INAF-OAC: D. De Martino, I. Musella, V. Ripepi, R. Silvotti, M. Capaccioli, M. Dall’Ora, E. Iodice Co-workers from INAF-OARoma, INAF-OATeramo, INAF-OATorino, INAF-OAPadova, INAF-OABologna, University of Pisa, University of Padova, University of Hertfordshire

  4. 60° Pal4 30° LeoII LeoI Pal3 Sext Pal12 G.C. Scl F -30° P -60° Fornax Orbit (Dinescu et al 2004) STREGA main aim: • Contributetounveil the Haloformationmechanismbyinvestigating the Southern part of the Fornaxstream (Lynden-bell 1982, Lynden-bell & Lynden-bell 1995, Dinescuet al. 2004) • Wewilluse RR Lyrae, LPVs and turn-off starsastracersto test the presenceofextendedhalos (extra-tidal) aroundFornax and SculptordSphs.

  5. Additional goals • Study of the Galactic Warp (CMa overdensity) • Disk and Halo White Dwarf Populations: WD LF  age of the Galactic disk, • IMF, SFR, Galactic dark matter • Disk and Halo Populations of Accreting White Dwarfs (CVs)  • space density, evolution of low mass close binaries, constraints • to the origin of galactic x-ray background. • Galactic star counts  Galactic structure

  6. 7 7 3 Pal3 Sext Pal12 Scl 1 10 F -30° P -60° 150 fields Field selection • 3 fields for Pal3 • CORE PROGRAM (first 2 yrs) • 24 fieldsaroundFornax and Sculptor (up to 10 tidalradii) in threedirectionstodistinguishbetweentidaltails and halos. • 3 fieldsfor Pal3. • 1 field for Pal12. • 2 stripsof 10 adiacentfields in the warpregion. • ~70 fields~180 hours • 1 field for Pal12 • SECOND PART (second 2 yrs) • Stripsof 10 adiacentfieldsdistributedtrasversallyto the stream. • For the WARP regionwe are coordinatedwith a project for the PaduaOmegaCAM GTO (P.I: Y. Momany) • ~80 fields~180 hours • 7 alternated fields along a third direction (G. C. ?) for both galaxies • 7 alternated fields (up to ~10 tidal radii) on the opposite direction for both galaxies • 10 alternated fields between Fornax and Sculptor along the orbit

  7. Survey strategy • 150 squared deg. at g22 mag with S/N30 • 360 hours over 4 years (2 years for the core program) • Data flow = 0.7 Tb/yr • VLT spectroscopic follow-up planned • 6 FTEs per year (3/5 years) • RR Lyrae, LPV and CVs: • 20 phasepoints in g (21.7 mag, with S/N=30) and 10 phasepoints in i (21.5 mag) forall the 150 fields. • 10 phasepoints in r (21.5) for 50 fieldsaroundgalaxies and clusters. • TO stars, C-M and C-C diagrams: TO stars can bedetected in the co-addedindividualexposures. Oneepoch, deepexposure (r=24.0 mag, S/N=10) on the remaining 100 fields. • WDs and CVs: u (23.4 mag), g (23.6 mag), r (23.6 mag), i (23.4 mag) and vStromgren (23.4 mag) with S/N=30 and Halpha (3x10-16erg/cm2/s) with S/N=10 (onlyforCVs) for 20 fields. g, r and i deepframes are obtainedco-addingindividualexposures.

  8. STEP Survey- the SMC in Time: Evolution of a Prototype interacting dwarf galaxy V. Ripepi, M. Marconi, I. Musella, M. Dall’Ora, A. Ruoppo, M. Capaccioli INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Napoli Co-I: M.R. Cioni (Univ. Hertfordshire) G. Clementini, M. Tosi, G. Macario, D. Romano, M. Cignoni (INAF-OABo) E. Cappellaro (INAF-OAPD) E. Brocato, G. Raimondo, M. Cantiello (INAF-OATeramo) A. Nota, M. Sirianni (STSCI) J.S. Gallagher (Univ. Wisconsin) E. Grebel (Max-Planck Institute)

  9. Why SMC • In hierarchical (CDM) models DGs are possible “building blocks” of larger galaxies (including MW)  understanding DGs star formation and chemical enrichment histories is fundamental • Local Group DGs are ideal laboratories for understanding DG properties: we can explore in detail ages, metallicities and spatial distributions of their stellar populations. • Among LG DGs the Small Magellanic Cloud is the closest late-type dwarf • tidal interacting with its neighbours: Wing and Bridge towards the LMC  probe galaxy interaction models

  10. OGLE OGLE III STEP Main survey goals • To study in detail the SFH of SMC and of its stellar cluster component through deep (1-2 mag fainter than the TO of the oldest population) CMD over the whole SMC body. • To study systematically for the first time the Wing and Bridge stellar populations both on the basis of CMDs and of variable stars as tracers (e.gCepheids,  Scuti etc.).

  11. Survey description • DEEP SURVEY: • Imaging of 35 sq. deg at B~25, V~24.5, i’~23.8 with S/N=10 ( ~ 30 on the body, 3 on the Bridge, 2 in the directions of the Magellanic Stream) • Seeing < 1.2” and grey time required 76.4 h • SHALLOW SURVEY: • Time series photometry (30 phase points in V, 10 in B and i’) on 30 sq. deg properly placed along the wing and the bridge: B~20, V~19.5, i’ 18.5 (expected magnitude of RR Lyrae) with S/N=100. • Summing up the exposures  same limiting magnitudes as above but with S/N=5. • Seeing <1.2” and bright time required 84.5 h • VLT FOLLOW-UP • medium and high resolution multiobject spectroscopy with VLT (FORS and FLAMES) is required for radial velocity and abundance determinations   40 h VLT time • Survey Summary: • 65 Squared degrees imaged in BVi at V24.5 mag • 170 h VST time over two years • 5 FTEs per year (3/4 years) • FLAMES/FORS2@VLT follow up planned

  12. Other on-going studies on SMC: • On-going studies on the SMC and/or the Magellanic system are characterized by: • very deep photometry and very small FOV (e.g. HST) • deep photometry but small/patchy FOV (e.g. IAC group) • very shallow photometry and wide FOV (e.g. OGLE) NO ON-GOING STUDY WILL SECURE DEEP PHOTOMETRY ON A WIDE FOV AS STEP WILL.

  13. VMC@VISTA Survey HST/VLT Fields Complementary observations/surveys • HST photometry on selected fields, old and young clusters (P.I. J. Gallagher/A. Nota). Observations completed. Data reduction on-going. • VLT spectroscopy (CaII triplet) on several SMC fields (P.I. E. Grebel). Observations completed. Data reduction on-going. • The Vista near-infrared YHKs survey of the Magellanic System (VMC@VISTA) ESO Public survey (P.I: M.R. Cioni): YHKs photometry of the Magellanic System (LMC, SMC, Bridge, Stream): 184 sq. deg. at Ks=20.3 mag in five years. Already approved by ESO .

  14. Surveys requiremens • STREGA & STEP have similar requirements: • Good pre-reduction (overscan, etc.) • Good photometric precision  PSF photometry (especially need for STEP, the SMC body can be really crowded) • Good accuracy (i.e.< 0.02 mag)  reliable photometric calibration • Efficient variable star finder  image subtraction analysis

  15. Present plans for data reduction • “Standard” pre-reduction with Astrowise including correction for bias, flat-field……astrometry • PSF photometry with DAOPHOT/ALLSTAR: custom automatic PSF modeling by using shell scripts. Slow! Looking for better solutions (PSFEx?). • Standard photometric plan + Astrowise • Efficient variable star finder: image subtraction analysis with VODIA/MDIA (new comparison tests useful) • Light curve analysis: custom programs • We are going to start tests with proprietary WFI data.

  16. Conclusions • STREGA & STEP are two small and well aimed surveys in the framework of INAF-OACN GTO time. • STREGA was conceived in 2004. Needed an update at the light of other large surveys ongoing or planned. • Data reduction with AW, but we need PSF photometry.

More Related