1 / 20

Surface Treatment Solutions for Low-k Dielectrics

Surface Treatment Solutions for Low-k Dielectrics. Peng Zhang, Brenda Ross, Bridget Horvath, John A. Marsella, Gary Johnson Air Products and Chemicals Daniel Koos, Frank Huang, Marie Mitchel Novellus Systems. Outline. Surface Treatment Solutions in Post-CMP Cleans for Low- k Dielectrics

rex
Download Presentation

Surface Treatment Solutions for Low-k Dielectrics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Surface Treatment Solutions for Low-k Dielectrics Peng Zhang, Brenda Ross, Bridget Horvath, John A. Marsella, Gary Johnson Air Products and Chemicals Daniel Koos, Frank Huang, Marie Mitchel Novellus Systems

  2. Outline • Surface Treatment Solutions in Post-CMP Cleans for Low-k Dielectrics • Contact Angle Studies • ATR-FTIR Results • Foam Data • Defect Performance • Conclusions

  3. Surfactants in Semiconductor Cleaning Process • Hydrophobic substrate surfaces • Organic materials, low-k • Smaller features

  4. Post-CMP Cleans Challenge for Hydrophobic Low-k Dielectrics • Hydrophobic surface are seen to de-wet during transfer from the polisher to the cleaner. • Additional de-wetting can occur during the rinse / dry process. • De-wetting leads to increase particle counts and associated water marks.

  5. Water Marks on Patterned Wafer

  6. Surface Conditioners in Post-CMP Cleans Reduce defects by wetting the surface in the wafer transfer and rinse/dry process • Have Superior wetting under dynamic conditions • Can be easily removed from substrate surface • Low foaming

  7. Wetting on Low-k dielectric Film Lowest Contact Angle on Low-k Surface

  8. Surface Conditioner A Wetting on Low-k Surface 45 degrees set as acceptable contact angle to wet wafer.

  9. Removal of Surface Conditioner (Low-k Dielectric Surface) Contact Angle of Water

  10. ATR FTIR Technique on Si Crystal Solution flow IR Beam Solution flow Flow Cell

  11. Adsorption Density Calculation A/N = bulk contribution + surface contribution = e Cs de + e (2de/dp) G • A: Absorbance of surfactant molecules • N: number of internal reflections • e: molecular absorptivity • Cs: bulk concentration • de:effective depth • dp: penetration depth of the evanescent wave • G: adsorption density of surfactant (moles/cm2)

  12. Molar Absorptivity of Surfactant ArT = e C P • ArT= Integrated absorbance of a transmission spectrum in the range of 3000-2800 cm-1 • C= Concentration of surfactant solution [M] • P= Transmission cell path length

  13. Surfactant Absorption

  14. Surfactant Adsorption Density Surface Conditioner A Surface Conditioner E

  15. Surface Desorption

  16. Foam Generation Test foam glass frit Mass Flow Controller N2 Supply

  17. Foam Dissipation Test Foam Height ~ ~

  18. Defect Results Film Comparison SC A Cu 3.5 0.87 USG* 2.6 0.85 Coral™ “A” 0.91 0.15 Post-CMP Clean Performance(Surface Conditioner A) Processing Polish Transfer Clean Rinse/Dry Polish Plus Clean Defect Results 2% Solutions  Normalized (Result / Baseline) *Un-doped Silicon Glass “Coral” is a trade mark of Novellus Systems, Inc.

  19. Conclusions • Surface conditioners can be used effectively to wet hydrophobic low-k surface. • They can also be easily removed from the hydrophobic surface without impact on the bulk film properties. • Superior defect performance was obtained in post-CMP cleans.

  20. Acknowledgement • University of Arizona A. Marcia Almanza-Workman, Srini Raghavan

More Related