1 / 20

Proton Driver Design

Proton Driver Design. Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab February 19, 2014. Proton Driver Outline. Overview History Accomplishments Current Concept Initial Baseline Selection Schedule Personnel and Effort Technology & Challenges. Proton Driver at August 2012 MAP Review. Overview

raheem
Download Presentation

Proton Driver Design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Proton Driver Design Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab February 19, 2014

  2. Proton Driver Outline Keith Gollwitzer | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014) • Overview • History • Accomplishments • Current Concept • Initial Baseline Selection Schedule • Personnel and Effort • Technology & Challenges

  3. Proton Driver at August 2012 MAP Review Keith Gollwitzer | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014) • Overview • Assumed Project X existed • Outlined how to increase Project X beam to 4 MW of 8 GeV H- ions • Accumulation Ring converts ions to protons as well as formats beam into a few intense bunches • Compressor Ring bunch rotates beam to the desired short bunch(s) • Delivery beam line(s)

  4. Since Last August 2012 MAP Review Keith Gollwitzer | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014) • Project X was split into stages • MASS looked at facilities starting with stage 2 of Project X • Proton Driver at 3 GeV • Proton Improvement Plan (PIP) II has become the start of a new facility for the Proton Driver • MASS assumes that there is a follow-on to PIP II resulting in the equivalent of stage 2 • MASS proposes Dual Use Linac • Proton Driver delivers 6.75 GeV proton beam

  5. Dual Use Linac 1.25-5 GeV 0.2-1.25 GeV 1-3 GeV 3-6.75 GeV Keith Gollwitzer | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014) • MAP linac for muon acceleration can be used for H- acceleration • muon beam 1.25 - 5 GeV • H- beam 3 - 6.75 GeV • FNAL SRF expertise is 325 MHz, 650 MHz and 1300MHz • MAP has moved to adopt these frequencies

  6. Key Proton Driver Accomplishments Since the August 2012 MAP Review Keith Gollwitzer | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)

  7. Present Day Assumptions Keith Gollwitzer | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014) • PIP II: Ion source (5mA) & RFQ (162.5 MHz) provides 1.92 x 108 particles per linac bunch. • Follow on to PIP II: an additional non-MAP linacsupporting high power beam to 3 GeV. • Similar to Stage 2 of Project X • 1 MW scenario: Dual Use Linacaccelerating ions at 15 Hz to 6.75 GeV • 4 ms pulses where 50% beam is chopped in front end so that linac bunches are synched with Accumulator Ring RF

  8. Revisit of Rings’ Designs Accumulator Compressor Keith Gollwitzer | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014) Previous work had been for 8 GeV

  9. Revisit of Rings’ Designs Keith Gollwitzer | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014) • Previous work has been for 4 MW at 8 GeV • Start by revisiting rings for 1 MW at 6.75 GeV • Follow with larger beam power studies

  10. Stripping System Keith Gollwitzer | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014) • Conversion of MW (or more) ion beam to protons for accumulation will be studied. • Stripping at 6.75 (or 8) GeV • Leveraging • SNS experience: 1 MW at 1 GeV • Continue Project X work: 300kW at 8 GeV • Same FNAL personnel involved • Ideas • Foil (stationary, multiple, rotating) • Laser stripping

  11. Delivery Beam Line(s) & Focusing System Keith Gollwitzer | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014) • Based upon IDS-NF design. • Focusing system will be interfaced with Target system. • Bunch instabilities may require extraction of several bunches from the Compressor Ring to be sent through different beam lines to arrive simultaneously at the target. • Focusing system could require a non-standard magnetic element(s) that focuses multiple beams that have little separation

  12. Initial Baseline Selection Schedule Keith Gollwitzer | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)

  13. Personnel & Effort Required Keith Gollwitzer | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014) A magnet expert is available for consulting Effort to reach IBS will be 1 FTE x 20 months

  14. Conventional Technology Keith Gollwitzer | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014) • Ring and beam line magnets • Dipoles • Quads • Sextupoles • Kickers • RF Systems • Collimators

  15. Novel Technologies Keith Gollwitzer | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014) • Stripping System • Greater than 1 GeV ion beam energy • Greater than 1 MW beam power • Target Focus System • Focus element(s) within greater than 1 T solenoid magnetic field • Multiple beams with small separation being focused

  16. Stripping System Challenges Will extend on-going work for linac beam conversion to protons and injection into the Main Injector Keith Gollwitzer | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014) • Static Foil or Rotating Foil • What beam power can be endured? • Multiple beam passes. Scattering. • Laser • Viability for MW beam • Unconverted Beam • Capture of non-protons (dump) • Limit activation of tunnel and components

  17. Focus System Challenges Keith Gollwitzer | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014) • Target Solenoid Field • A “fringe” field > 1 T exists 5 m upstream of target • Magnetic shielding or canceling magnetic field • Off-axis proton beam path is helical • Multiple beams with small crossing angles at target • Previous work showed that the separation of 4 beams 5 m upstream of target to be ~15 cm.

  18. Proton Driver Conclusion Keith Gollwitzer | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014) • Design work • Revisit of rings designs almost complete • Delivery beam line to be based upon IDS-NF • Technology • Most components are conventional • Stripping system will be leveraged from SNS experience and work done for linac beam injection into the Main Injector • Final Focusing element(s) may require design of a non-conventional magnet

  19. Extras Keith Gollwitzer | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)

  20. Possible Layout Final Cool 6DCool 1 GeV Proton Linac Initial Cool Accumulator & CompressorRings Front End 1-3 GeV Proton Linac To SURF Target NuMAX: ns to SURF 1 GeV Muon Linac (325MHz) RLA to 63 GeV 3-6.75 GeV Proton &1.25-5 GeV MuonDual Use Linac 300m Higgs Factory Muon Collider Keith Gollwitzer | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)

More Related