1 / 19

Public Economics: Tax & Transfer Policies (Master PPD & APE, Paris School of Economics) Thomas Piketty Academi

Public Economics: Tax & Transfer Policies (Master PPD & APE, Paris School of Economics) Thomas Piketty Academic year 2013-2014 . Lecture 4: Income Taxes Over Time & Across Countries (October 29 th 2013) (check on line for updated versions). The modern progressive income tax.

rafal
Download Presentation

Public Economics: Tax & Transfer Policies (Master PPD & APE, Paris School of Economics) Thomas Piketty Academi

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Public Economics: Tax & Transfer Policies (Master PPD & APE, Paris School of Economics)Thomas PikettyAcademic year 2013-2014 Lecture 4: Income Taxes Over Time & Across Countries(October 29th2013) (check on line for updated versions)

  2. The modern progressive incometax • The modern progressive incometaxwascreated in 1909 in the UK, 1913 in the US, 1914 in France, 1922 in India, 1932 in Argentina, etc., and isbasedupon the principle of a comprehensivetax base • Comprehensiveincometax: t = t(y) with y = total incomefrom all incomecategories (wages + pensions + self-employmentincome + rent + dividend + interest + etc.) • ≠ schedularincometax: differenttax rates for differentincomecategories (UK system in 19c)

  3. Effective vs. Marginal tax rates • Effective or averagetax rate = t(y)/y • t(y) progressive if and only if t(y)/y riseswith y • Marginaltax rate = t’(y) • t(y) convex = t’’(y)>0, i.e. t’(y) riseswith y • Convexityimpliesprogressivity (but not necessary: as wewillsee, U-shaped pattern of marginal tax rates whentransfers are takenintoaccount) • Most progressive income taxes use a bracket system: fixed marginal tax rates withinincomebrackets • But one canalso use continuous system • Exemple of computations usingtaxschedulesfrom France and the US: seeexcel file

  4. Taxingindividuals or couples? • In manyEuropean countries (Scandinavia, UK, Italy, Spain,.), incometax t(y) isbaseduponindividualincome y: whether one lives in a couple or not isirrelevant • In France, Germany & US (for bottomhalf of pop), incometaxiscomputedat the level of married couples using « split » system (« quotient conjugual »): incometax = 2 x t[ (y1+y2)/2 ], with y1,y2= spousesincomes • With t(y) convex, thisfavoursunequal couples; if y1=y2, thereis no taxadvantageat all • Key question: unitaryhousehold or not? • The split system canreinforcegenderinequality; the individual system favoursfemalelaborsupply

  5. The top marginal tax rate • Top marginal tax rate = marginal tax rate applying to the highestincomes • Chaotichistoryduringpastcentury • US and UK inventedconfiscatorytax rates for veryhighincomes; thenbig reversal since 1980s • Same pattern for top inheritancetax rates: US-UK inventedconfiscatory top rates, thenbig reversal since 1980s (see Lectures 6-7) • Until 1970s, top tax rates on « unearnedincome » (capital income) oftenhigherthan top tax rate on « earnedincome » (laborincome) • Reversal since 1980s: free capital flowswith no exchange of information, specialtaxregimes for capital income >>> regressivityat the top (seeFrance 2010)

  6. From an elitetax to a mass tax • In every country, the incometaxat the time itiscreatedistargeted on the top 1-2% of the population; thenitisgraduallyextended to the entire population (or at least to 50-60% of the population). This makestax revenues much more significant: the mass incometaxis an important part of the rise of the modern fiscal state • Seee.g. graph on fraction of pop subject to tax in France. Seemy2001 book (chapters 4-5) for a completepolitico-economichistory of the French incometax • Explanations for this transition fromelite to mass tax ? Is it happening everywhere in developing countries?

  7. Explanations: Economics/Technology (rise of large corporations and wage-earner status >> easier to tax) or Politics (social acceptability of tax, fiscal consent) ? Probably both • On the political economy of fiscal development: • Besley-Persson, “On the Origins of State Capacity”, 2009 [article in pdf format] • Kleven-Kreiner-Saez, “Why Can Modern Governments Tax so much?”, 2009, [article in pdf format]) •  An interesting contrast: income tax in India and China; see T. Piketty & N. Qian, « Income inequality and progressive income taxation in China and India: 1986-2015 », AEJ 2009 [article in pdf format]

More Related