1 / 20

“Everything is everywhere – the environment selects.” (Baas-Becking, 1934)

“Everything is everywhere – the environment selects.” (Baas-Becking, 1934)

orestes-kristopher
Download Presentation

“Everything is everywhere – the environment selects.” (Baas-Becking, 1934)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. “Everything is everywhere – the environment selects.”(Baas-Becking, 1934) “Although there is no direct effect of distance per se, distance is related to the likelihood that past divergence of biotic assemblages, whether due to genetic drift or adaptation to past environments, is maintained by genetic isolation.”(Hughes Martiny et al., 2006)

  2. Why should microbes be universal? • Small • Abundant • Metabolically plastic • Can remain dormant for long times (“seedbank”) • Some nearly identical 16S rRNA from each polar ocean (Massana et al., 2000) • Universal dispersal, differential growth…

  3. Biogeography compared to macrofauna • Darwin’s “three great facts” • Are microbes cosmopolitan? Endemic? • Variation amongst microbes • What forces lead to geographically structured populations?

  4. Biogeography compared to macrofauna • Darwin’s “three great facts” • Are microbes cosmopolitan? Endemic? • Variation amongst microbes • What forces lead to geographically structured populations? (Johnson et al., 2006)

  5. Diversity vs. distance • BOX-PCR of fluorescent Pseudomonas isolates taken from 4 continents (Cho & Tiedje, 2000)

  6. Diversity vs. distance • BOX-PCR of fluorescent Pseudomonas isolates taken from 4 continents (Cho & Tiedje, 2000) • Positive local correlation, negative global correlation (Hughes Martiny et al., 2006)

  7. Non-random distributions of free-living taxa (Hughes Martiny et al., 2006)

  8. Why do organisms live where they do? • Contemporary environment vs. historical events? • Is it really geography, or simply niche differences? • Why would geography matter? • Constraints on dispersal and colonization • Diversification and extinction (Hughes Martiny et al., 2006)

  9. Biogeography: flagellates • Diversity of Paraphysomonas (Finlay, 2002) (Finlay & Clarke, 1999)

  10. Biogeography: Sulfolobus • Sequenced 9 loci from 78 isolates from hot springs (Whitaker et al., 2003) • Group by geography • No significant correlation with pH or temperature

  11. Biogeography: phage • Exchange due to recombination or reassortment during coinfections • Isolated and sequenced cystoviridae from Pseudomonas syringae pathovar phaseolicola(Silander et al., 2005)

  12. Microbes in a host w/ biogeography: Helicobacter pylori • Sequenced 8 loci from 370 isolates from 27 geographical, ethnic and/or linguistic groupings (Falush et al., 2003) • 1418 polymorphic nt positions

  13. Microbes in a host w/ biogeography: Helicobacter pylori • STRUCTURE - deduces populations from MLST • Define populations (Fig. 1A) & subpopulations (1B) • Assumes linkage equilibrium, association much less globally than within defined populations (4-5 sufficient) • Disequilibrium due to very short stretches (r = 0.0296, thus average chunk of 34 bp)

  14. Microbes in a host w/ biogeography: Helicobacter pylori • STRUCTURE - deduces populations from MLST • Define ancestry (Fig. 1C) • Optimal number of past groups to achieve current mixture Inuit Maori white South African England

  15. Microbes in a host w/ biogeography: Helicobacter pylori • Global picture of present and past • Coherence between host and microbe • We have imposed a geographic structure

  16. Evolutionary history of Salmonella typhi • Very little diversity (2 nt amongst 3.3 kb from 26 isolates) – is it all a new sweep? • ‘Mutation discovery’ of 199 gene fragments (~500 bp) from 105 strains = 88.7 kb (Roumagnac et al., 2006) • 66 were polymorphic • 37 non-synonomous to 33 synonomous • Only weak bias in Ka/Ks for housekeeping vs. cell surface • 5 look like HGT • Two ~25 kb regions from S. enterica serovar Typhimurium • One gene with 6 SNPs from S. enterica serovar Paratyphi A

  17. Evolutionary history of Salmonella typhi • MLST data to generate minimal spanning tree • Highly unusual • 100% parsimonious • 3 hypothetical nodes • Ancestral node present • H45 has ancestral seq. for every locus • Branches largely 1 SNP • Long persistence, present on multiple continents

  18. Evolutionary history of Salmonella typhi • Estimate tmrca using two estimates of clock • 10-43 kya or 26-71 kya • Effective population size (Ne) currently 2.3 x 105 – 1.0 x 106

  19. Evolutionary history of Salmonella typhi • Screened 55 loci for 59 older strains (1958-1967) from Africa and Vietnam • Found ancestral nodes • Persistent

  20. Evolutionary history of Salmonella typhi • Response to new selective pressure: NalR • First used in SE Asia in 1989 (NalR found in 1991) • Screened an additional 295 strains from SE Asia No fixation… Genetic parallelism 2.5 x 108 higher rate of mutation than long-term

More Related