1 / 39

Why Outsource?

Lessons Learned and Critical Success Factors A Thought Leadership Forum: University of Maryland Center for Public Policy and Private Enterprise Queenstown, Maryland Darryl A. Smith Deputy Program Manager Monday, November 15, 2004. Why Outsource?. Share/transfer risks.

noelle
Download Presentation

Why Outsource?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lessons Learned and Critical Success FactorsA Thought Leadership Forum: University of MarylandCenter for Public Policy and Private EnterpriseQueenstown, Maryland Darryl A. SmithDeputy Program ManagerMonday, November 15, 2004

  2. Why Outsource? • Share/transfer risks. • Increased need for system and product interoperability across the enterprise. • Need to improve corporate focus. • Recruitment and retention of skilled personnel. • No leverage to introduce world-class capabilities. • Lack of insight into true operating costs

  3. NASA Strategy • Established Agencywide team that took a corporate perspective • Worked closely with other major Agency initiatives to ensure coordination and appropriate interfaces. • Examined other “Seat Management” endeavors. • Conducted Market Research • Developed Center Cost Baseline Concept • Requested that vendors propose both heterogeneous and homogeneous solutions. • Established an aggressive schedule. • Ensured availability to other Agencies through partnership with GSA • Communicated, Communicated, Communicated

  4. Structuring the Contract • Invest heavily in requirements definition • A delicate balance of specifics and ambiguities • A “Keep it Simple” approach to metrics • Make it Performance-Based • Incentives for good performance • Fixed price • Perform due diligence before award • Establish a baseline commitment

  5. The Implementation Challenges • Insufficient change management strategy; magnitude of cultural changes underestimated • Change from cost-plus to fixed price contracting • “Loss of control” by the customers • Ownership, level-of-effort personal support, “buy what you want, when you want it” • Strong emotional issue with the customer • Limited and inconsistent business processes to interface with ODIN • No Agencywide policy on ODIN implementation • Inconsistent scope across the Centers • Lack of authority in the ODIN Program Office • Inconsistent expectations among Agency, ODIN Program, ODIN contractors, and customers • Contractor performance and service delivery issues at the Centers

  6. The Implementation Challenges - Continued Glenn Research Center - GRC Ames Research Center - ARC Goddard Space Flight Center - GSFC NASA Headquarters - HQ Stennis Space Center - SSC Langley Research Center - LaRC Dryden Flight Research Center - DFRC Kennedy Space Center - KSC Johnson Space Center - JSC Marshall Space Flight Center - MSFC 6

  7. ODIN Organizational Structure NASA Chief Information Officer (CIO) (Code V) Legend CFO – Chief Financial Officer CIO – Chief Information Officer CO – Contracting Officer DOCO – Delivery Order Contracting Officer DOCOTR – Delivery Order Contracting Officer Technical Representative GSA – General Services Administration GWAC – Government-wide Acquisition Contract TMR – Technical Management Representative NASA CIO Board NASA CFO Community NASA/GSFC CIO Third Party Testing (IV&V) Contractor (Alterion) Agency ODIN Program Manager and CO GSA (GWAC) Tier One Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) e.g., Apple, HP, Dell, Toshiba ODIN VENDORS: *Lockheed Martin *OAO SAIC CSC DynCorp Northrup Gruman Diginet(*)Denotes Active Delivery Orders NASA Enterprise/ Center DOCOTRs, TMRs & DOCOs 7

  8. Contract Overview • GSFC awarded seven performance based, fixed-price, Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts in June 1998 • Contracts have a 12-year period of performance. • Centers award delivery orders up to 3-year period of performance • Current ODIN contractor and supported centers represented below: Lockheed Martin Lockheed Martin OAO* GSFC DFRC GRC ARC LaRC HQ JSC KSC MSFC SSC 8 * Wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin

  9. Roles and Responsibilities • ODIN contractor is responsible for: • Selecting systems, products and services; • Establishing staffing levels; • Establishing SLAs with non-ODIN contractors; • Meeting the requirements for interoperability, functionality, and maintaining configuration control; • Complying with all applicable Agency IT standards; and • Asset/Resource Tracking • Government is responsible for: • Establishing IT standards; • Establishing Center-level Configuration Control boards (CCB); • Approving and funding infrastructure upgrades; • Maintaining “Smart Buyer” capability.

  10. ODIN Seat Categories • Desktop: • General Purpose • Scientific and Engineering • Hardware Maintenance • Network Attached Device • Server • Web, Application, Computational, File • Intra-Center Communications • Phone, Administrative Radio, Public Address, Local Video, FAX, Remote Communications, Virtual Team Meeting Seat For each seat category, functionality and both standard and optional service levels are defined; catalogue options allow complete flexibility to tailor the seat to meet the end user’s requirements

  11. What do I get for my monthly seat payment? • Standard services include: • Hardware and both application and system software acquisition, licensing, installation and maintenance • Periodic hardware and software technology refreshment, synchronized with current commercial offerings • Shared peripheral services (e.g., file, print, e-mail, etc.) • Asset management • IT Security • Help Desk support, training, system administration and other services • Network access and support, including network engineering, management, and upgrade planning • Local backup and restore • Moves, adds and changes

  12. Help Desk • ODIN vendor is required to provide integrated customer support/help desk for all ODIN-managed services • Service includes: • Problem ticket initiation, tracking and resolution • Providing customer and service providers with system status and alerts • Monitoring systems to proactively determine, diagnose and resolve problems • Providing access to ODIN service offerings • Providing consultation services for all Triage level 1 software packages

  13. Desktop Support and Refreshment • Desktop Hardware • 2 hr. contiguous to 3 working days Return to Service (RTS) • 1.5, 3, 4, or 5 year refresh cycle • Tier 1, Third-party certified equipment • Desktop Software • 2 hr. contiguous to 3 working days RTS • 6 or 12-month system and application software refresh • 3 levels of support • Triage Level 1 – Full Support • Triage Level 2 – Installation and pass-through • Triage Level 3 – ‘Drop/Ship’

  14. Catalogue of Services and Commercial Components (CSCC) • Designed to augment the seat • Additional memory, larger monitor, etc. • Can include stand-alone services • Personal Digital Assistant (PDA’s – ie: Palm, Blackberry, etc..) • Additional Moves, Adds and Changes • Generally a one-time charge • Service/support for 3 years

  15. Desktop Technology Refreshment • “Lemon Law” ensures reliable equipment • Technology Refresh Plan is based on inventory at beginning of delivery order • Third Party Testing Facility (Alterion) • Alterion performance ratings drive technology refreshment under ODIN • NASA/Alterion Partnership • Quarterly commercial market survey/benchmarking process establishes top performer for desktop seats (NASA funded) • NASA/Alterion web site publishes survey data • ODIN vendors work with OEMs to develop offerings • Alterion validates vendor-proposed systems • ODIN Vendor pays cost of validation benchmarking • System offerings are not acceptable until validated by Alterion

  16. Infrastructure Management • Different from standard seats! • Title for all infrastructure (including replacements or upgrades) remains with the Government. • Infrastructure refresh requirements proposed/priced after due diligence. • Management of the necessary LAN communications infrastructure is expected to be bundled with each service offered. • Infrastructure upgrades approved and funded separately (by the Government). • Infrastructure inventory managed by the ODIN vendor.

  17. Incentives • Transition Bonus • Up to $100k set aside for successful 180-day transition • Performance Retainage Pool (PRP) • 3% of sum of monthly seat prices • Available on 1st anniversary, then semi-annually • Tied to successful implementation of the ODIN Operating Model • Meets/Fails to Meet/Discretionary • Metric Performance Retainage Pool (MPRP) • 1% of sum of monthly seat prices • Tied to Level 1 Metrics • Meets/ Fails to Meet

  18. Desktop Performance Metrics • Level 1 • Service Delivery (98%) • Frequency of action requests being responded to and successfully completed within the allotted time. • Availability (98%) • Unscheduled outages and # users affected • Customer Satisfaction (agreed to at DOSP and/or during Delivery Order Negotiations) • Measured using commercial/broad industry-accepted practices • Level 2 • Contractor Specific Metrics • 1st call resolution, hardware failure rate, switch latency, backbone utilization, etc. (the vendor determines the measurement in an effort to improve their performance) • Level 3 • Trend Metrics • Trend views of Level 1 and Level 2 metrics in 3-month or greater increments. (Measuring the contractor’s service level trends)

  19. Features Summary • ODIN is a flexible contract vehicle that includes: • Automatic technology refreshment requirements, • Standards and architecture management mechanisms, • Government managed change control procedures, • Allowance for government ownership of assets where it’s determined to be in the Government’s best interest, • “Unwinding” provisions to allow transition of contractor owned assets at termination (to government or another contractor), • Allowances for installation and use of non-outsourcer provided hardware and software, and • Accommodations for unplanned requirements.

  20. Current Status 20

  21. Current Status - Continued • NASA • NASA’s 10 sites are operational • Delivery Order values ~$315 million • ~36,543 “fully supported” seats • ~8,322 network only • ~1056 Admin Radio seats • ~48,699 phones • 10 sites reviewing strategy for follow-on delivery orders • GSFC awarded their follow-on Delivery Order effective February 1, 2004 • ARC, DFRC, GRC and LaRC awarded their follow-on Delivery Order effective April 1, 2004 • HQ awarded their Delivery Order effective September 1, 2004 • JSC, KSC, MSFC, and SSC are currently negotiating their follow-on Delivery Orders

  22. ODIN Delivery Order services selected reflect flexibility of interfacing with existing contracts and/or support requirements.

  23. Current Status - Continued • Established a very strong ODIN team • Partnerships between Contractors, between Centers and between the Centers and Contractors • Annual face-to-face workshops, functional tiger teams, regularly scheduled telecons and meetings • Traceable and continuous improvements in the Delivery Order (DO) process resulted from successive lessons-learned • e.g., Center-unique DO mods used to overcome Master Contract ambiguities and to meet new Agency and customer requirements • Now have consistent and documented processes and procedures • Shared best practices, International Standards Organization (ISO) certifications • ODIN’s flexibility further demonstrated through the catalog • Enhanced Systems Administration • Latest technology monitors • Specialized processors

  24. Performance Against the Objectives 24

  25. Performance Against the Objectives - Continued • Focus NASA civil service personnel on core research and development activities • Reduced the amount of procurement involvement with securing ODIN services • Greatly reduced the level of civil servants involved with Asset Management

  26. Performance Against the Objectives - Continued • Promote information technology systems and product interoperability • Over 36,000 desktops replaced since 1998. • No additional investment by NASA (acquisition, logistics, integration, data removal, disposal) • Enhance and optimize service delivery • No method of performance measurement was in place prior to ODIN • ODIN has implemented monthly and quarterly performance metrics to track vendor performance

  27. On a scale of 1-5, with 5 being “Excellent,” only responses marked 4 or 5 are counted toward achieving this metric 28

  28. 29

  29. 30

  30. With ODIN • Documented asset baseline • Known, visible, reliablecosts • Predictable and “fixed”costs for future planning • No more “haves” vs.“have nots” effect • Prior to ODIN • No established baseline • Total cost of ownershipunknown • IT costs hidden in programbudgets • Investments made on available funding basis • Unequal access to technology Performance Against Objectives - Continued • Reduce cost and improve cost managementand cost containment • Before and after cost model is very different • ODIN seat costs are better than predicted and comparable to industry

  31. $500 NASA Benchmark KSC* Gartner Average* Chevron* ODIN Business Case (low) ODIN Business Case (high) Update to Business Case (low) Update to Business Case (high) Gartner (low)** Gartner (high)** GSA HUD VDOT UTMB Baseline*** UTNB Contract*** NMCI General Purpose NMCI High End Business*** ODIN Average 450 400 350 300 Monthly Seat Cost 250 200 150 100 50 0 1996 2001 * Data from ODIN Business Case ** From State of Texas Study *** University of Texas **** Navy Marine Corp Intranet Data from ODIN Program Post Implementation Business Assessment Kelly, Anderson & Associates, November 2001 Seat Cost Comparison

  32. ODIN Accomplishments • Established a very strong ODIN team • Partnerships between Contractors, between Centers and between the Centers and Contractors • Annual face-to-face workshops, functional tiger teams, regularly scheduled telecons and meetings • Traceable and continuous improvements in the DO process resulted from successive lessons-learned • e.g., Center-unique DO mods used to overcome Master Contract ambiguities and to meet new Agency and customer requirements • Now have consistent and documented processes and procedures • Shared best practices, ISO certifications • ODIN’s flexibility further demonstrated through the catalog • Enhanced Systems Administration • Latest technology monitors • Specialized processors

  33. What’s Working • Civil Servant refocusing • Tech refresh • Over 36,000 desktops replaced since 1998. • No additional investment by NASA (acquisition, logistics, integration, data removal, disposal) • Interoperability and Security of Systems • Infrastructure support & upgrades • Current technology • Common metric and data reporting • Flexibility • Vendor Relationships!

  34. What’s Working - Continued • Predictable cost baseline for ODIN provided services (Budget Management) • Filling the gaps • 508 Compliancy (CAP Support) • Seat Prices • ODIN has helped the Agency meet Presidential Management Agenda (PMA) goals

  35. Lessons Learned 36

  36. What Needs Work • Asset Management • Upgrade/New Product Rollouts • Help Desk • Attachment R Process Consistency • Customer Satisfaction Consistency • Catalog

  37. Successful Management Techniques • Use Common Sense! • Involve your outsourcer in strategic planning (Partnership and Communication) • Be Flexible • Be Patient • Approach each problem with a “Win-Win” attitude • Don’t hold back information from your outsourcer • Trust, but verify • Limit line manager’s ability to circumvent the contract

  38. Additional Questions?Please contactDarryl.A.Smith@nasa.govor call(301) 286 – 5250http://www.odin.nasa.gov 39

More Related