1 / 18

Interim Evaluation of EU Pre-Accession Programmes in Turkey (Service Contract No. 2007/142-454)

Interim Evaluation of EU Pre-Accession Programmes in Turkey (Service Contract No. 2007/142-454). Kick-off for 2008 Monitoring and Evaluation 25 February 2008. IE Contract - The MWH Consortium. 2. IE Turkey - Team and Contact Details. 3. DG Enlargement - Unit E4

neka
Download Presentation

Interim Evaluation of EU Pre-Accession Programmes in Turkey (Service Contract No. 2007/142-454)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Interim Evaluation of EU Pre-Accession Programmes in Turkey(Service Contract No. 2007/142-454) Kick-off for 2008 Monitoring and Evaluation 25 February 2008

  2. IE Contract - The MWH Consortium 2

  3. IE Turkey - Team and Contact Details 3

  4. DG Enlargement - Unit E4 Task Manager – Jan Behrens Consultation System Feedback Follow-up of IE Recommendations Interim Evaluation Framework Contract Methodology Quality Control System Oversight Secretariat General for EU Affairs Delegation of the European Commission Planning Coordination Feedback MWH Consortium Interim Evaluation Team IE Conclusions & Recommendations Interim Evaluation Input Project Stakeholders 4

  5. Interim Evaluation – What it is NOT • Interim Evaluation is not audit.... • Interim Evaluation is not control..... • Importantly, Interim Evaluation is not monitoring by the Commission services 5

  6. Interim Evaluation – What it IS • Part of a general policy of evaluating all Community expenditure • Helps to improve relevance, effectiveness, impact and accountability of EU funds • Provides stakeholders with independent assessments of the state of implementation • Participative and capacity building exercise 6

  7. Interim Evaluation – WHY we do it • To assess the state of implementation of the projects • To assess the state of implementation of initiatives in the sector • To provide information to improve implementation of ongoingprojects and sector performance • To provide lessons learned for future projects • To provide lessons learned in relation to the project cycle and its implementation 7

  8. How do monitoring and evaluation differ? They are different, but interrelatedfunctions, as they both contribute knowledge as a basis for accountability and enhanced performance; • Monitoring: “Are we doing things right”? while • Evaluation, in addition, “Are we doing the right things?” and “Are there better ways of achieving the results?”

  9. Definition of monitoring,evaluation and audit

  10. The Process – The 5 Criteria 10

  11. Different Kinds of Impact 11

  12. Example of Impacts Example: Laboratory equipment for testing hazardous chemicals 12

  13. Ratings – Six levels 13

  14. Interim Evaluation – Rating Model 14

  15. Interim Evaluation - Information Base • Documentation (Accession Partnership, Regular Reports, national strategies, policy documents, Monitoring Reports, project and programme level etc.) • Financial data (up-to-date status) • StructuredInterviews with stakeholders (policy makers, management, EUSG, ECD, CFCU, experts, contractors, Twinning Advisers, beneficiaries etc.) • Surveys/questionnaires: depending on project • Other analysis as required (e.g. databases) 15

  16. Information Base – Documents Required • Monitoring Reports • Good quality Monitoring Reports (on time, completed correctly, accurate and up to date information) • Other documentation/Per Project • Project Fiche • Technical Assistance – ToR, Inception Report, Progress Reports, important output documents (TA reports etc.), Minutes of meetings etc. • Twinning – Contract, Quarterly Reports, output documents, Minutes of meetings etc. • Supplies/works – tender dossier, reports of evaluation committees etc. as required • Grant schemes – guidelines, list of applicants/grantees 16

  17. IE Reporting Process – The Results • 1. Findings are presented in a draft Sectoral InterimEvaluationReport containing: • Conclusions and Recommendations of the independent Evaluators • Sectoral recommendations • Operational recommendations aimed at specific projects • ‘Early warnings’ • 2. The draft report is finalised taking into account the comments as and where Evaluators judge necessary • 3. The finalised report is debriefed where stakeholders discuss the recommendations and agree a plan of action 17

  18. Interim Evaluation Reports 2007-2008 18

More Related