1 / 9

1.6 Units/Acre

Images: Lincoln Institute. 1.6 Units/Acre. Grosse Pointe, MI. Images: Lincoln Institute. 3.8 Units/Acre. Holdenville, Oklahoma. Images: Lincoln Institute. 11.2 Units/Acre. Hamtramck, MI. Images: Lincoln Institute. 19.2 Units/Acre. Shaker Heights, Ohio. Density: 1.9 units/ac.

neith
Download Presentation

1.6 Units/Acre

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Images: Lincoln Institute 1.6 Units/Acre Grosse Pointe, MI

  2. Images: Lincoln Institute 3.8 Units/Acre Holdenville, Oklahoma

  3. Images: Lincoln Institute 11.2 Units/Acre Hamtramck, MI

  4. Images: Lincoln Institute 19.2 Units/Acre Shaker Heights, Ohio

  5. Density: 1.9 units/ac Density: 3.2 units/ac Images: Lincoln Institute Which has higher density?

  6. Setting Your Goals • Where do you want development and conservation to occur? • What type of development do you want, and what would you like it to look like? • At what density is development most appropriate in any given area of your community? • Community need is driven by people.

  7. Recommendation #1 – Comp. Plan • Comprehensive Plan • Reviewed every 3-5 years • Sets development and conservation goals in an organized fashion • Plans for long-term financial stability • Resolves tradeoffs up-front • Provides for future logical, consistent decision making • Legal stability: logical justification of decisions • Sets a framework for implementation

  8. Select Counties – 2000 Census

  9. Strategies for Balanced Land Use Rural Urban Suburban Compact Development Net Increase Conservation Development Historic Protection No Net Change Transfer of Development Rights Scenic Protection Net Decrease Net Decrease Farmland Preservation

More Related