1 / 16

Structure

- Identifying Ergonomic Requirements of ICT for Healthcare Working Systems - Podtschaske, B. & Friesdorf, W. Structure. Situation & Problem Objective & Approach Results & Conclusion. Situation. Possibilities. ICT – to gain higher quality, safety and efficiency!. Resources. Problem.

neal
Download Presentation

Structure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. - Identifying Ergonomic Requirements of ICT for Healthcare Working Systems -Podtschaske, B. & Friesdorf, W.

  2. Structure • Situation & Problem • Objective & Approach • Results & Conclusion

  3. Situation Possibilities ICT – to gain higher quality, safetyand efficiency! Resources

  4. Problem

  5. Objective Before developing ICT solutions:improve the understanding ofhealthcare working systems! Specifying usability context analysisbydomain specific models!

  6. Approach Concept based approach • Screening of Ergonomic Standards: Usability Framework; • Identifying, adopting and developing of domain specific ergonomic models and methods (MedicoErgonomics); • Exemplary use in an analysis of the context of use (Case Study).

  7. Results (1/4) – Usability Framework Intended outcome user goals task Usability equipment effectivness environment Outcome of use efficiency Context of Use satisfaction product (ICT) Usability measures

  8. Results (2/4) – Model of collaborative work communication Model ofcollaborativework coordination shared knowledge [Steinheider & Legrady, 2001]

  9. Results (3/4) – Case Study; Context of Use Requirements to support „collaborative work“ • Coordination: • better use of resources (more efficient) • reduction of treatment time (reducing of unnecessary treatments) • active, holistic therapy planning and controlling • support of administrative processes • Communication: • effective communication and information flows • no changes in mediums • improved information transparency • high quality of used data

  10. Results (4/4) – Case Study: Tools/ Functions Evident process support „collaborative work“

  11. Lessons Learned, Discussionand Outlook • MedicoErgonomic models are able to support the usability context analysis better understanding of the healthcare working system by structuring the requirements • Further usability context analysis are recommended (chronic heart diseases, dementia patients, diabetes mellitus etc.).

  12. Thank you very much for your attention!www.awb.tu-berlin.de

  13. More Information: http://www.igi-global.com/ B. Podtschaske, M. Koch,W. Friesdorf : Medico Ergonomics – A human centered approach for developing smart health care applications In:M. Ziefle & C. Röcker (Eds.): Human-Centered Design of E-Health Technologies: Concepts, Methods and Applications (30. October 2010) http://www.igi-global.com/bookstore/TitleDetails.aspx?TitleId=45949&DetailsType=AffiliateBio

  14. Additionally investigations such as usability tests and simulations for Evaluation of the efficiency of use and the satisfaction with the product are necessary.

  15. Results (3/3) – Case Study Context of Use user user task task equipment equipment environment environment

  16. Human Machine Results (2/3) – Domain specific models Context of Use user user task task equipment equipment environment environment

More Related