1 / 14

Effective Written Communication in Quantitative Economics

R. Keeney—April 23, 2012. Effective Written Communication in Quantitative Economics. Communicating Economics. It is expected that if you have a Purdue AGEC degree, you will be an effective communicator of economic rationale and ideas Written and oral Interviews and applications

morton
Download Presentation

Effective Written Communication in Quantitative Economics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. R. Keeney—April 23, 2012 Effective Written Communication in Quantitative Economics

  2. Communicating Economics • It is expected that if you have a Purdue AGEC degree, you will be an effective communicator of economic rationale and ideas • Written and oral • Interviews and applications • Assignments, projects, technical reports, your own promotion etc.

  3. Some Guidelines • All from Research without Tears • John Creedy, 2008, published by Edward Elgar Press • Quote from Samuel Johnson: • “What is written without effort is in general read without enjoyment.” • There are lots of types of writing • Each profession has its own standards and requirements • The aims here are meant to encompass nearly all professional (non-literary) writing

  4. The objective of professional writing • Clarity • Written communication must emerge as a transparent statement of issues, methods, and results/conclusions • Data/Calculations/Graphs are not clear communication • These are supportive or contradictory evidence in the development of a thesis (argumentative or descriptive) • As the author, you are the expert providing the interpretation • Provide clear interpretations and justify them • Succinctness is a virtue (often where the effort part comes in)

  5. Creedy’s 4 Characteristics of Well Written Analysis • Demonstrates a clear depiction of the question or problem addressed • Motivates the question as worthy of study or investigation • Explicitly states both methods and results • Recognizes both the value and limitations of results and conclusions

  6. Effective writing… • …tells the reader… • What they will discover in the reading • Why this discovery is worth knowing • How this discovery was made • What is the importance or significance of the discovery • …consists of careful draft and revision • Critical review can be important to revision • …takes time and planning

  7. Introduction • Nearly every document has an introductory section, in almost every case it is the key to successful communication • In some professions this may be less important than an Executive Summary • It must provide (at least in general) answers to what, how, and why relative to the topic addressed in the writing • Also might lay out the further writing via signposts • How is the document organized for the impatient reader who wants to read in a different order than you have written?

  8. Background/Review Sections • Relevance • Reviewing literature is done to serve your purposes, not to drop names or show how much you have read • Good literature reviews are not exhaustive • Your knowledge/familiarity on the other hand… • Might be the worst taught aspect of the writing discipline • Be sure to avoid: Author 1 showed/said/found X…Author 2 showed/said/found Y…Author 3 showed/said/found Z…

  9. Main Body • Technical and other descriptive reporting • Results reporting and analysis • A highly variable section of writing that is tough to generalize • Let your topic be your guide on how a body section is broken up among discussions of • Data and methods • Results • Analysis

  10. Conclusions • Restatements • Question/Approach/Findings • Implications • Your analysis has to mean something… • What limitations have been overcome and what remain • Necessary future work

  11. Example paper on website • On the class website, my writeup of the AGEC 352 diet using all 1100+ foods from the 2009 database • Whether it’s a good or bad example of written communication is up to you to evaluate • Reading critically helps your writing • When you are reading and find something you don’t understand, ask yourself if it is your knowledge or the author’s ability to communicate that is limiting…

  12. The results: Total Cost = $1.04

  13. Why these foods?

  14. Sensitivity

More Related