Understanding Scalar Quantities and Coordinate Transformations in Physics
This course delves into the essential physics and mathematics needed for a deep understanding of motion, energy conservation, and elementary electromagnetism (E&M). Key topics include Newton's laws of motion, energy, momentum conservation, and fundamental calculus concepts like differential equations and vector calculus. It also covers geometric transformations, direction cosines, and the properties of scalar quantities, which remain invariant under coordinate transformations. By exploring these concepts, students will develop a solid foundation for advanced studies in physics.
Understanding Scalar Quantities and Coordinate Transformations in Physics
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Background • The Physics Knowledge Expected for this Course: Newton’s Laws of Motion the “Theme of the Course” • Energy & momentum conservation • Elementary E&M • The Math Knowledge Expected for this Course: • Differential & integral calculus • Differential equations • Vector calculus • See the Math Review in Chapter 1!!
Math ReviewCh. 1:Matrices, Vectors, & Vector Calculus • Definition of a Scalar: Consider an array of particles in 2 dimensions, as in Figure a. The particle masses are labeled by their x & y coordinates as M(x,y)
If we rotate the coordinate axes, as in Figure b, we find M(x,y) M(x,y) That is, the masses are obviously unchanged by a rotation of coordinate axes. So, the masses are Scalars! • Scalar Any quantity which is invariant under a coordinate transformation.
Coordinate TransformationsSect. 1.3 • Arbitrary point P in 3d space, labeled with Cartesian coordinates (x1,x2,x3). Rotate axes to (x1,x2,x3). Figure has 2d Illustration • Easy to show that (2d): x1 = x1cosθ + x2sin θ x2 = -x1sin θ + x2cos θ = x1cos(θ+ π/2) + x2cosθ
Direction Cosines • Notation:Angle between xi axis & xjaxis (xi,xj) • Define the Direction Cosine of the xi axis with respect to the xj axis: λij cos(xi,xj) • For 2d case (figure): x1 = x1cosθ + x2sinθ x2 = -x1sinθ + x2cosθ = x1cos(θ +π/2) + x2cosθ λ11 cos(x1,x1) = cosθ λ12 cos(x1,x2) = cos(θ - π/2) = sinθ λ21 cos(x2,x1) = cos(θ + π/2) = -sinθ λ22 cos(x2,x2) = cosθ
So: Rewrite 2d coordinate rotation relations in terms of direction cosines as: x1 = λ11 x1 +λ12 x2 x2 = λ21 x1 +λ22 x2 Or: xi = ∑jλij xj (i,j = 1,2) • Generalize to general rotation of axes in 3d: • Angle between the xi axis & the xjaxis (xi,xj). Direction Cosine of xi axis with respect to xj axis: λij cos(xi,xj) Gives: x1 = λ11x1 + λ12x2+ λ13x3 ; x2 = λ21x1+ λ22x2+ λ23x3 x3 = λ31x1 + λ32x2+ λ33x3 • Or: xi = ∑jλijxj (i,j = 1,2,3)
Arrange direction cosines into a square matrix: λ11 λ12 λ13 λ = λ21 λ22 λ23 λ31 λ32 λ33 • Coordinate axes as column vectors: x1x1 x =x2 x =x2 x3x2 • Coordinate transformation relation: x = λ x λ Transformation matrix or rotation matrix
Example 1.1 Work this example in detail!
Rotation Matrices Sect. 1.4 • Consider a line segment, as in Fig. Angles between line & x1, x2, x3 α,β,γ • Direction cosines of line cosα, cosβ, cosγ • Trig manipulation (See Prob. 1-2) gives: cos2α + cos2β + cos2γ = 1 (a)
Also, consider 2 line segments direction cosines: cosα, cosβ, cosγ, & cosα, cosβ, cosγ • Angle θbetween the lines: • Trig manipulation (Prob. 1-2) gives: cosθ = cosαcosα +cosβcosβ +cosγcosγ (b)
Arbitrary Rotations • Consider an arbitrary rotation from axes (x1,x2,x3) to (x1,x2,x3). • Describe by giving the direction cosines of all angles between original axes (x1,x2,x3) & final axes (x1,x2,x3). 9 direction cosines:λij cos(xi,xj) • Not all 9 are independent! Can show: 6 relations exist between various λij: Giving only 3 independent ones. • Find 6 relations using Eqs. (a) & (b) for each primed axis in unprimed system. • See text for details & proofs!
Combined results show: ∑jλij λkj = δik (c) δik Kronecker delta: δik 1, (i = k); = 0 (i k). (c) Orthogonality condition. Transformations (rotations) which satisfy (c) are called ORTHOGONAL TRANSFORMATIONS. • If consider unprimed axes in primed system, can also show: ∑iλij λik = δjk (d) (c) &(d) are equivalent!
Up to now, we’ve considered P as a fixed point & rotated the axes (Fig. a shows for 2d) • Could also choose the axes fixed & allow P to rotate (Fig. b shows for 2d) • Can show (see text) that: Get the same transformation whether rotation acts on the frame of reference (Fig. a) or the on point (Fig. b)!