1 / 9

Particles and Fields Package Weekly Team Meeting, SSL June 1 2010

Particles and Fields Package Weekly Team Meeting, SSL June 1 2010. Dave Curtis, PFP PM. PFP Peer Reviews. All peer reviews completed successfully Next step Peer review leads need to assign people to respond to actions Actions and recommendations should get some kind of response

mimi
Download Presentation

Particles and Fields Package Weekly Team Meeting, SSL June 1 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Particles and Fields Package Weekly Team Meeting, SSL June 1 2010 Dave Curtis, PFP PM

  2. PFP Peer Reviews All peer reviews completed successfully Next step Peer review leads need to assign people to respond to actions Actions and recommendations should get some kind of response Responses to Actions (not recommendations) shall be provided to the review chair before IPDR (preferably before we make charts) Better yet is to get concurrence from chair before IPDR. Need to present peer review results at IPDR List of actions with status Expanded chart for contentious actions

  3. Peer Review RFA Summary Recommendations closed by concurrence of review lead, PFP PM Actions closed by concurrence of Review Chair Details of actions in following presentations

  4. Documents Part of preparing for PDR includes delivering documents to MIS, typically 30 days before PDR Entrance criteria for PDR being tracked by the review team Many documents have been submitted MAIP, RMP, CMP, SEMP, WBS, FMDD, PHA, FMEA, LLL, SWR, SDP, MPL, PIL Some need to be delivered shortly Instrument specifications (last call for changes) Drawing Tree (Daniele compiling) Verification Plans, I&T Plans (Curtis) SAR (Curtis) IPDR package (10 days before IPDR)

  5. PDR Agenda, Day 1 Minor reordering since last week Presentation File Names

  6. PDR Agenda, Day 2,3

  7. GSFC-STD-1001 Coverage GSFC-STD-1001A describes what should be in reviews including PDR Author of GSFC-STD-1001A is on our review team Appendix C-2 of GSFC-STD-1001A lists the evaluation factors for an ‘element PDR’ such as our IPDR I have extracted that appendix and allocated those criteria to presentations (see last week’s team meeting presentation)

  8. PFP Mass Final call for changes so we can all be on the same page for PDR

  9. PFP Power Need to reallocate NTE amongst instruments to level margin Liens: Expect to need operational heat during eclipse None allocated for most instruments; amount needed pending thermal analysis Preliminary estimates included for MAG and EUV

More Related