140 likes | 150 Views
Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds. Ewan O’Connor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth, Nicolas Gaussiat. Overview. Radar and lidar can measure boundary layer clouds at high resolution: Cloud boundaries - radar and lidar LWP – microwave radiometer
E N D
Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds Ewan O’Connor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth, Nicolas Gaussiat
Overview • Radar and lidar can measure boundary layer clouds at high resolution: • Cloud boundaries - radar and lidar • LWP – microwave radiometer • LWC – cloud boundaries and LWP • Cloudnet – compare forecast models and observations • 4 European remote-sensing sites (currently), 7 models (currently) • Cloud fraction, liquid water content statistics • Microphysical profiles: • LWC - dual-wavelength radar • Drizzle properties - Doppler radar and lidar • Drop concentration and size – radar and lidar
Statistics - liquid water clouds • 2 year database • Use lidar to detect liquid cloud base • Low liquid water clouds present 23% of the time (above 400 m) • Summer: 25% • Winter: 20% • Use radar to determine presence of “drizzle” • 46% of clouds detected by lidar contain occasional large droplets • Summer: 42% • Winter: 52 %
LWC - Scaled adiabatic method • Use lidar/radar to determine cloud boundaries • Use model to estimate adiabatic gradient of lwc • Scale adiabatic lwc profile to match lwp from radiometers http://www.met.rdg.ac.uk/radar/cloudnet/quicklooks/
Compare measured lwp to adiabatic lwp • obtain ‘dilution coefficient’ Dilution coefficient versus depth of cloud
Stratocumulus liquid water content • Problem of using radar to infer liquid water content: • Very different moments of a bimodal size distribution: • LWC dominated by ~10 m cloud droplets • Radar reflectivity often dominated by drizzle drops ~200 mm • An alternative is to use dual-frequency radar • Radar attenuation proportional to LWC, increases with frequency • Therefore rate of change with height of the difference in 35-GHz and 94-GHz yields LWC with no size assumptions necessary • Each 1 dB difference corresponds to an LWP of ~120 g m-2 • Can be difficult to implement in practice • Need very precise Z measurements • Typically several minutes of averaging is required • Need linear response throughout dynamic range of both radars
Drizzle below cloud Doppler radar and lidar - 4 observables(O’Connor et al. 2005) • Radar/lidar ratio provides information on particle size
Drizzle below cloud • Retrieve three components of drizzle DSD (N, D, μ). • Can then calculate LWC, LWF and vertical air velocity, w.
Drizzle below cloud • Typical cell size is about 2-3 km • Updrafts correlate well with liquid water flux
Profiles of lwc – no drizzle Examine radar/lidar profiles - retrieve LWC, N, D
Profiles of lwc – no drizzle Consistency shown between LWP estimates. 260 cm-3 90 cm-3 80 cm-3
Profiles of lwc – no drizzle Cloud droplet sizes <12μm • no drizzle present Cloud droplet sizes 18 μm • drizzle present Agrees with Tripoli & Cotton (1980) critical size threshold