220 likes | 469 Views
SPCC & CCP Issues. Jim Roewer APPA E&O Conference April 12, 2006. Spill Prevention Control & Countermeasures (SPCC) Regulations. SPCC Rule Revisions. SPCC Amendments Published July 17, 2002 Federal Register (67 Fed. Reg. 47042)
E N D
SPCC & CCP Issues Jim Roewer APPA E&O Conference April 12, 2006
Spill Prevention Control & Countermeasures(SPCC) Regulations
SPCC Rule Revisions • SPCC Amendments Published July 17, 2002 Federal Register (67 Fed. Reg. 47042) • Original Proposal October 22, 1991; Amendments Proposed February 17, 1993 & December 2, 1997) • Effective Date August 16, 2002
Compliance Timeframes • Revisions to plans must be made by February 17, 2003, implemented by August 18, 2003 • New facilities must have plan before commencing operations • Acquired facilities considered already operational and must have plans in place
Compliance Timeframes • Revisions to plans must be made by February 17, 2006, implemented by August 18, 2006 • New facilities must have plan before commencing operations • Acquired facilities considered already operational and must have plans in place
Oil-filled Equipment & Small Facility SPCC Rule • ANPR September 2004 • Proposed Rules December 2005 • Extension of Compliance Deadlines to October 31, 2007 (or 1 year from Final Rule) • Tailored SPCC Program for Electrical Equipment & Small Facilities • Comment Deadlines January (extension) and February (substance) 2006
Threshold Determination • Applies to facilities that “could reasonably be expected to discharge oil … into or upon navigable waters ….” (40 C.F.R. §§112(a)(1) & (b)) • Man-made features cannot be considered • Volume threshold >1320 gallons • Containers <55 gallons exempted
Electrical Equipment • Oil-filled equipment is subject to rule • Equipment volume included in threshold determination • Equipment excluded from “bulk storage container” definition, avoids requirements for: • bulk storage secondary containment • corrosion protection • periodic integrity testing • inspection
Containment/Diversionary Structures • All regulated facilities required to provide containment and/or diversionary structures or equipment to prevent a discharge of oil • Diversionary structures: • dikes, berms, retaining walls • curbing • culverting, gutters, drainage systems • weirs, booms, other barriers • spill diversion ponds • retention ponds • sorbent materials
Electrical Equipment • Oil-filled electrical equipment from which no discharge in last 10 years & is subject to monitoring &inspection does not need general secondary containment (waiver of PE’s determination of impracticability determination) • Discharges from Electrical Substations ~20/Year
Small Facilities • Facilities with cumulative volumes <10,000 gallons still need SPCC plan, but • SPCC Plans do not need to be certified by a PE • Potential reduction in cost/administrative activities • May limit flexibility (e.g., determination of impracticability, environmental equivalence)
SPCC “Loose Ends” Rulemaking • Will address other issues arising from 2002 SPCC Amendments • Expected to address differentiation of petroleum v vegetable/animal oils as per the Edible Oil Regulatory Reform Act (“EORRA”) • EPA announced plans for proposal in 2006, but ….
SPCC Summary • Compliance Deadlines Extended to October 31, 2007 • Proposed Relief for Small Facilities (<10,000 gal) • Proposed Relief from Secondary Containment for Electrical Equipment • “Loose Ends” Rule, including Differentiation
CCP Regulatory Background • August 1993 & May 2000 Non-Hazardous Regulatory Determinations • Rulemaking Schedule: • CCP Disposal • August 2006 Proposal; Final Rule August 2007 • Mineplacement • October 2007 Proposal; Final Action 2008
CCP Management Issues • EPA’s Concerns: • Groundwater Monitoring • CCP Placement in Sand & Gravel Mines (Non-engineered Sites) • Dry Handling of CCPs • Mill Rejects Management • Mineplacement • Utilization
Regulatory Options: CCP Disposal • National Subtitle D Standards • Application of Industrial D Guidance • Implementation of USWAG CCP Action Plan • Status Quo (State Regulatory Control) • DOE/EPA Report on New Facilities June 2006
Regulatory Options: CCP Mineplacement • RCRA Standards • SMCRA Standards • Status Quo (State Regulatory Control Under SMCRA and/or RCRA Authorities) • NAS Report on Mineplacement February 2006
CCP Management Challenges • Damage Case Resolution • Survey of New Disposal Facilities • Subtitle D Regulations • Enviros’ Lawsuits • Mercury Rules/Multi-Pollutant Legislation
Hg & Multi-Pollutant Impact on CCPs • Increase in FGD generation • Decrease in CCP generated due to decrease in coal consumption • Impact on ash quality due to SCR, low-NOX burners, Hg control • Challenge to CCP utilization
CCP Issues Summary • Regulatory Future Uncertain • Non-hazardous Status of CCPs Critical • Disposal & Mineplacement Regulations • CAA Implementation Will Affect CCPs • Regulatory Status Unlikely to be Affected • Impact on Utilization Possible • Utilization Activities Key
Jim Roewer 202/508-5645 jim.roewer@uswag.org Questions?