1 / 12

Focus Group 4 Interoperability

Network Reliability and Interoperability Council V. Focus Group 4 Interoperability. NRIC V Council Meeting October 30, 2001. Ross Callon Juniper Networks Scott Bradner Harvard University Co-chairs, Focus Group 4. Outline. Charter Membership Progress to date

maryspears
Download Presentation

Focus Group 4 Interoperability

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Network Reliability and Interoperability Council V Focus Group 4 Interoperability NRIC V Council Meeting October 30, 2001 Ross Callon Juniper Networks Scott Bradner Harvard University Co-chairs, Focus Group 4

  2. Outline • Charter • Membership • Progress to date • Recommendations / Next Steps

  3. Charter The purpose of Focus Group 4 is to provide recommendations to the Council that, when implemented, will facilitate and assure interoperability of public data networks. The duties of the Focus Group 4 will be to prepare studies, reports, and recommendations for assuring data network interoperability within the parameters set forth in the NRIC V Charter. Focus Group 4 will determine what levels of interoperability are needed. Focus Group 4 will also monitor future developments to ensure that interoperability is not at risk. Focus Group 4 will make recommendations with respect to interoperability issues that may arise from convergenceand digital packet networks. Focus Group 4 may also make recommendations with respect to such additional interoperability issues as the Commission may specify.

  4. Active Participants Service Providers and/or Network Operators Equipment Suppliers Others Cisco Fred Baker Convedia Garland Sharratt Juniper Ross Callon Lucent Reinhard Metz Karl Rauscher AT&T Rick Canaday, Randy Bush C & W Chris Liljenstolpe Conxion Jeff Swinton Cox Alex Best Illuminet Bruce Johnson Genuity Justin Aborn Level3 Doug Sicker, Todd Branning, Nasser Elaawar MFN Joseph Malcolm,… Qwest Robert Hubbard Sprint Ted Seely, David Meyer Verizon Dan Currie Worldcom Craig Silliman XO John Curran FCC Kent Nilsson, Scott Marcus Harvard U. Scott Bradner Mitretek Guerin Goldsmith Telcordia Ralph Parker Visa Robert Neumann

  5. Progress To Date • Recent Meetings • July 24, 2001 (Cisco, San Jose) • Sept 13 meeting cancelled (editing moved on-line) • Carrier Interconnection • Cooperation with 2.A2 • Testing discussions

  6. Carrier Interconnection / Peering Issue • We have had discussions on SP interconnection and peering at all meetings • We have published a short statement encouraging service providers to publish their criteria for peering • Comments discussed at July meeting, issues moved to informational paper • Completed informational paper on interconnection • Has been distributed to Council members • Is ready for publication • (outline follows)

  7. Service Provider Interconnection for Internet Protocol Best Effort Service NRIC V, Focus Group 4 1. Introduction 1.1 Overview 1.2 Terminology 2. Background 2.1 Basic Data Connectivity in the Internet 2.2 Overview of Routing in the Internet 2.3 Asymmetric Traffic Load 2.4 Public versus Private Interconnect 2.5 Service Provider Interconnection: Peering and Transit 2.6 Flexible Interconnection 3. Quality of Interconnections 3.1 Performance and Scalability 3.2 Robustness and Security 3.3 Tools for Measuring Interconnections

  8. Service Provider Interconnection for Internet Protocol Best Effort Service (continued) 4. Potential Issues 4.1 Publishing Interconnection Guidelines 4.2 Issues to be Considered 4.3 Examples of Criteria 5. Summary References (Includes pointers to interconnection guidelines by Genuity, Level 3, and WorldCom)

  9. Cooperation with 2.A2 • FG4 previously reviewed Focus Group 2, working group 2.A2, best practices for network reliability in data networks • We are intending to review interoperability BPs in the 2.A2 final report

  10. Testing • FG4 has had multiple discussions on testing • Agreement: • Strong agreement on importance of testing • There are many valid forms of testing • There are many organizations involved in testing • (including vendors and service providers) • FG4 is reluctant to endorse any particular test group • We have not yet produced formal output in this area. • We are proposing that future work of FG4 may include white paper on testing.

  11. Future Meeting Schedule • Nov 13 in San Jose, CA (hosted by Cisco) • Intend to discuss possible future FG work • If necessary, could consider final edits to white paper on carrier interconnection • Additional meetings depend upon NRIC re-chartering • Propose to schedule meetings for Jan/Feb, and Mar/April, in anticipation of ongoing work.

  12. Recommendations / Next Steps • Continue to encourage participation • Publish informational paper • Coordinate with other FGs as appropriate • Solicit input on ongoing tasks for FG4

More Related