1 / 22

Bringing it Home: Critical Thinking at the Institutional Level

Bringing it Home: Critical Thinking at the Institutional Level. 32 nd International Conference on Critical Thinking July 26, 2012 Rush Cosgrove cosgrove@criticalthinking.org Patty Payette, Ph.D. patty.payette@louisville.edu. Session Goals.

marlow
Download Presentation

Bringing it Home: Critical Thinking at the Institutional Level

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bringing it Home: Critical Thinking at the Institutional Level 32nd International Conference on Critical Thinking July 26, 2012 Rush Cosgrove cosgrove@criticalthinking.org Patty Payette, Ph.D. patty.payette@louisville.edu

  2. Session Goals • Deepen our understanding of long-term continuing professional development centered around the ‘learning community.’ • Develop a plan for improving teaching and learning for critical thinking at your home site.

  3. Our Operating Assumptions • Scale and scope of working with critical thinking concepts is variable among participants. • Concepts, ideas and principles shared can be applied flexibly across contexts. • Participants will pick and choose which ideas fit for their professional contexts.

  4. How did we get here?Rush: • Seven years as professional workshop coordinator • Historian of Critical Thinking • Small-scale research at university and high school level • Larger scope for current and planned research • Growing emphasis on communities of learning

  5. How did we get here?Patty: • Faculty developer with 11 years of working professionally with faculty across disciplines on teaching and learning, including establishing and facilitating learning communities • Leading a long-term professional development effort at the University of Louisville (UofL) called Ideas to Action (i2a) • Associate director of the Delphi Center for Teaching and Learning at UofL • Working with Paul-Elder critical thinking concepts since September 2007

  6. Ideas to Action, or i2a • Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) as part of reaccreditation process with SACS-COC • QEP focus on critical thinking across the curriculum and community engagement • Data gathered for improvement suggested students craved skills and knowledge that are relevant to real-world contexts • Global outcomes: “Students will be able to think critically.” “Students will develop the ability to address community issues.”

  7. Critical Thinking & Faculty • Paul, 1996 • 140 randomly sampled California college faculty • indicate critical thinking is a primary objective of their instruction • could give a clear explanation of critical thinking • had difficulty describing how to balance content coverage with fostering critical thinking • could articulate how to assess critical thinking 89% 19% 77% 8-9% http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/critical-thinking-testing-and-assessment/594

  8. Activity: Consider your context • To what extent are the realities discussed so far reflected at your home base? • To what extent are your colleagues aware of these problems? • To what extent are they ready to learn to teach critical thinking more explicitly, systematically, socratically? • What are some of your key questions you are bringing to this session? • What do you hope to accomplish or better understand?

  9. Consider: Implicit model of professional development (Clarke and Hollingsworth, 2002)

  10. Professional Development as Learning Cycle (Chism, 2004)

  11. Key Concept: Learning Community • AKA community of practice, faculty or professional learning community • Common features: • Shared mission • Commitment to inquiry & learning • Ongoing structure and facilitation • Collaboration, sharing, and mutual support • Balance theory and practice • Explicit reflection & assessment • Climate of trust & safet

  12. Faculty Learning Community on Critical Thinking at UofL • Included 12-13 faculty from across disciplines • Met regularly during semester while devising & applying critical thinking innovations based on • Background reading, homework, and sharing of new work • Individual consultation required • Library of artifacts submitted • Employed best practices in course design, assessment and critical thinking • Tri-level reflection: learning community, critical thinking, their own teaching growth • Participants expected to serve as advocates upon completion

  13. Other learning community formats • Committees or workgroups • E-learning communities across institutions • Professional learning communities (PLC) • Faculty reading circles • Learning communities centered around cohorts (e.g. pre-service teachers; early career faculty; first-year student staff)

  14. Learning Community: fundamental and powerful concepts Mission and Purpose: • Begin with backward design: “What is your desired result, no matter what else happens?” Curriculum/structure • Consider common text as starting point • Build structure & accountability throughout Scholarly Process • Focus on knowledge, application, sharing Build Community: • Expect a learning curve • Build group identity: a name, a symbol/catch phrase, Enablers and Rewards: • Create incentives that make sense (Cox, 2004)

  15. Activity: plan your own learning community • What is the purpose and focus of your learning community? • What kind of tone do you want to set and how will you do that? • Who will facilitate? (choose resources, answer questions) • Who should be involved? How will they be recruited? • When will you meet? For how long? Structure of sessions? • How will peer feedback, observations or input be included? • Will ‘homework’ be involved? What kind? How often? • Where is a neutral or comfortable location to meet? • What resources, including people, can you draw upon to assist you?

  16. Break!

  17. Features of Effective Professional Development • Effective continuing professional development is: • Long-term • Volunteer-based • On-site • Cooperative (involving constructive critique as well as support and advice) • Is taken seriously, and personally, by administrators and key teachers • Includes opportunities for both learning and applying theory • CT Theory must be substantive • Harnesses local expertise

  18. i2a professional development Learning Communities www.louisville.edu/ideastoaction

  19. Principles of i2a PD • Scaffolded • Goals and assessment tightly aligned • Sensitive to discipline-specific realities • Connected to existing assessment or programmatic structures • Transparent about where we are/what we know & don’t know • Supported by administrative & opinion leaders • Begins ‘where they are’ and not where we want them to be • Hands-on, practical application • Support through learning curve • Model the use of P-E critical thinking framework • Know the answer to “What’s in it for me?” • “Resource-full”

  20. Activity: Plan your own PD Begin to plan a professional development program for your home base • Which aspects that we have introduced seem most important? • Which are most immediately feasible? Which more long-term? • Who will be an early supporter? • Who will be an agent of change? • Which intellectual, financial, physical, or other resources can be harnessed? • Who are your main stakeholders? Can you describe a vision of the benefits of PD for each of your “audiences”? • What are the existing structures, groups, programs, or people you could leverage or “piggyback on” for your efforts? • What are your next steps? • What are the speedbumps you anticipate?

  21. Q&A with Rush and Patty • Questions • Clarifications • Concerns • Suggestions

  22. Wrap up: Ten “takeaways” from this session • Insights • Ideas • “Ah ha” moments • Concepts • Strategies

More Related