1 / 11

Employee Satisfaction Survey Report 2006

Employee Satisfaction Survey Report 2006. OIRA. Introduction. Administered in November 2006 to all AUB employees, academic and non-academic. Purpose better understand employee perspectives on their jobs and how they felt about working for AUB.

lynn
Download Presentation

Employee Satisfaction Survey Report 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Employee Satisfaction Survey Report 2006 OIRA

  2. Introduction • Administered in November 2006 to all AUB employees, academic and non-academic. • Purpose • better understand employee perspectives on their jobs and how they felt about working for AUB. • detect changes or improvements in employee perspectives due to initiatives. • Instrument • form used in 2003 and 2000 was administered again with some minor modifications.

  3. Breakdown of the Employee Survey

  4. Administration • Survey was made available in English and Arabic versions • Forms sent to departments for distribution • Filled out by employees and then collected and sent back to OIRA in sealed envelopes. • No names or identification numbers were requested, only department codes. • Employees were constantly reminded of importance of filling out the forms, and were assured of confidentiality. • The distribution and collection of the surveys took around a month.

  5. Response Rate by Grade Level

  6. Breakdown of the Sample by Age

  7. Breakdown of Sample by Years of Employment

  8. Data Analysis • Reported item descriptives and frequencies for the whole sample and by each of the demographic variables studied • age, • grade, • educational level, • number of years at AUB, and • gender. • Significant differences in satisfaction level between various groups on each item were also investigated • Reliability analysis conducted on the survey and subscales revealed excellent reliabilities ranging between 0.85 and 0.97. • 60% did not provide department code.

  9. Highest & Lowest Rated Items

  10. General Conditions & Climate • Highest rated items were • # 2 ‘I am proud to work at AUB’ and • # 8 ‘I feel a great deal of loyalty towards AUB’ • Lowest rated items were • # 5 ‘I am satisfied with the physical work conditions’ • # 4 ‘I am given challenging assignments’. • Two items showed marked improvement: • # 3’I feel too much stress and pressure in my job’ • # 7 ‘in my area, quality is more important than productivity’, • 5 items went down and 2 remained same. • Physical work conditions still seem to be a problem, in addition to stressful work conditions.

More Related