1 / 16

Science Program and Team Leaders Update

Science Program and Team Leaders Update. Brian Stephenson LUSI XCS Scientific Team Leader XCS Final Instrument Design Review June 17, 2009. History. Scientific case for LCLS developed in September 2000 in “The First Experiments” document

lupita
Download Presentation

Science Program and Team Leaders Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Science Program and Team Leaders Update Brian Stephenson LUSI XCS Scientific Team Leader XCS Final Instrument Design Review June 17, 2009

  2. History • Scientific case for LCLS developed in September 2000 in “The First Experiments” document • One of the six themes, “Studies of Nanoscale Dynamics in Condensed Matter Physics,” focused on the use of x-ray correlation spectroscopy (XCS) • XCS Scientific Team formed in summer of 2004 from scientists submitting Letters of Intent to develop experiments • Group has grown to include additional interested scientists from workshops

  3. XCS Scientific Team Leader: Brian Stephenson (Materials Science Div., Argonne) Co-Leaders: Karl Ludwig (Dept. of Physics, Boston Univ.), Gerhard Gruebel (DESY) Sean Brennan (SSRL) Steven Dierker (Brookhaven) Eric Dufresne (Advanced Photon Source, Argonne) Paul Fuoss (Materials Science Div., Argonne) Zahid Hasan (Dept. of Physics, Princeton) Randall Headrick (Dept. of Physics, Univ. of Vermont) Hyunjung Kim (Dept. of Physics, Sogang Univ.) Laurence Lurio (Dept. of Physics, Northern Illinois Univ.) Simon Mochrie (Dept. of Physics, Yale Univ.) Alec Sandy (Advanced Photon Source, Argonne) Larry Sorensen (Dept. of Physics, Univ. of Washington) Mark Sutton (Dept. of Physics, McGill Univ.)

  4. Scattering of a Coherent Beam: Speckle • Speckle Reveals Dynamics, Even in Equilibrium • X-ray Speckle Reveals Nanoscale/Atomic-scale Dynamics Wide-Angle Scattering: Ordering in Fe3Al Alloy Small-Angle Scattering: Polystyrene Latex Colloid

  5. Scientific Impact of X-ray Photon Correlation Spectroscopy at LCLS • New Frontiers: • Ultrafast • Ultrasmall • Time domain complementary to energy domain • Both equilibrium and non-equilibrium dynamics

  6. Unique Capabilities of LCLS for XPCS Studies • Higher average coherent flux will move the frontier • smaller length scales • greater variety of systems • Much higher peak coherent flux will open a new frontier • picosecond to nanosecond time range • complementary to inelastic scattering

  7. Wide Scientific Impact of XPCS at LCLS • Simple Liquids–Transition from the hydrodynamic to the kinetic regime. • Complex Liquids– Effect of the local structure on the collective dynamics. • Polymers – Entanglement and reptative dynamics. • Proteins – Fluctuations between conformations, e.g folded and unfolded. • Glasses – Vibrational and relaxational modes approaching the glass transition. • Phase Transitions – Order fluctuations in ferroelectrics, alloys, liquid crystals, etc. • Charge Density Waves – Direct observation of sliding dynamics. • Quasicrystals – Nature of phason and phonon dynamics. • Surfaces– Dynamics of adatoms, islands, and steps during growth and etching. • Defects in Crystals– Diffusion, dislocation glide, domain dynamics. • Soft Phonons – Order-disorder vs. displacive nature in ferroelectrics. • Correlated Electron Systems – Novel collective modes in superconductors. • Magnetic Films – Observation of magnetic relaxation times. • Lubrication – Correlations between ordering and dynamics.

  8. t1 t2 t3 XPCS using ‘Sequential’ Mode • Milliseconds to seconds time resolution • Uses high average brilliance sample transversely coherent X-ray beam monochromator “movie” of speckle recorded by CCD 1

  9. Time Correlation Functions for Various Wavenumbers Autocorrelations, g2(Q,t) for 70nm-radius PS spheres in glycerol at volume fractions of 0.28 (left, single exponential) and 0.52 (right, double exponential, but a stretched exponential can also be used). L.B. Lurio, et al. Physical Review Letters84, 785-788 (2000).

  10. Amphiphilic Complex Fluids Amphiphilic molecules possess two (or more) moieties with very different affinities e.g. soaps, lecithin, block copolymers ..and organize immiscible fluids

  11. XPCS at LCLS using ‘Split Pulse’ Mode Femtoseconds to nanoseconds time resolution Uses high peak brilliance sample variable delay sum of speckle patterns from prompt and delayed pulses recorded on CCD Analyze contrast as f(delay time) Contrast splitter transversely coherent X-ray pulse from FEL

  12. Relaxor Ferroelectrics Dielectric relaxation times span picoseconds to milliseconds near phase transition Polar nanoregions are believed responsible G. Xu et al., Nature Materials 5, 134 (2006) J. Macutkevic et al., Phys. Rev. B 74, 104106 (2006)

  13. Dynamics at Surfaces and Interfaces Study fluctuations at surfaces and interfaces in: fluids, membranes, … XFEL: Onset of non-classical behaviour (Q > 2 nm-1) (beyond continuum hydrodynamics) Capillary wave dynamics at high Q (=1Å, Q=1 nm-1):  [s] countrate (FEL) Water  25 ps 20 Mercury  0.5 ps 0.3 G. Grübel et al., TDR XFEL, DESY (2006)

  14. Design Goals and Challenges • Use of high x-ray energies, up to 24 keV, for flexibility in reducing beam heating • Ability to tailor coherence parameters, e.g. beam size, monochromaticity • Versatile geometry diffractometer • Large sample-to-detector distance at small and large scattering angles • Area detector with small pixels and low noise

  15. XCS Scientific Team Input into XCS Instrument • Following the requirements determined by the scientific case, an XCS Instrument was designed by LUSI staff (this will be described by Aymeric Robert later today) • The Team helped develop the Physics Requirements Document for XCS Instrument (see Backup Documents on FIDR web page) • The XCS Scientific Team has had extensive input into the instrument design through initial LOIs, workshops, and regular meetings of Team Leaders with LUSI staff and review committees

  16. XCS Instrument is Ready for CD3 • The design of the XCS Instrument is mature and meets the performance requirements of XCS experiments at LCLS • The new schedule allows delivery of an Early Science Instrument suitable for a large class of XCS experiments a year earlier than previously possible • We recommend rapid approval of CD3 to allow XCS users to take advantage of the successful early lasing of LCLS at hard x-ray energies

More Related