development and evaluation of shared learning wiki in an interprofessional context n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Development and evaluation of shared learning wiki in an Interprofessional context PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Development and evaluation of shared learning wiki in an Interprofessional context

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 28

Development and evaluation of shared learning wiki in an Interprofessional context - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 71 Views
  • Uploaded on

Development and evaluation of shared learning wiki in an Interprofessional context. Date or reference. Denis McGrath, Leslie Robinson and Melanie Stephens. Aims and Objectives. To demonstrate an overview of the wiki project and its outcomes for HE / Interprofessional Education

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Development and evaluation of shared learning wiki in an Interprofessional context' - latoya


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
development and evaluation of shared learning wiki in an interprofessional context

Development and evaluation of shared learning wiki in an Interprofessional context

Date or reference

Denis McGrath, Leslie Robinson and Melanie Stephens

aims and objectives
Aims and Objectives
  • To demonstrate an overview of the wiki project and its outcomes for HE / Interprofessional Education
  • Define and review the importance of Interprofessional Education
  • Internet Landscape (Godwin Jones, 2003)
  • Methodology
  • Findings
  • Discussion
  • Test drive
  • Feedback
interprofessional education
Interprofessional Education
  • Healthcare delivered by multiple professionals and support workers
  • Community Care Act (DH, 1990), The New NHS Modern and Dependable (DH, 1997), NSFs (DH, 2001 onwards).
  • Professional Tribes (Maben et al, 2007)
  • Focus on holistic, humanistic, compassionate and co-operative care and embrace collective responsibility (Wilcock and Headrick, 2000)
internet landscape
Internet Landscape
  • New Technologies such as, wikis, social book marking, blogs, podcasts, RSS feeds.
  • Transformation of isolated static information stores to dynamic applications.
  • A social phenomena: an approach to generating and distributing Web content in a social context.
  • Flexible open communication,
    • decentralisation of authority,
    • allows the freedom to share and re-use information,
    • simple to use
  • Embodies the flexible socio-centric approach to learning (Vygotsky, 1920)
methodology
Methodology
  • 125 nurses and 50 radiography undergraduate students
  • Face-to-face
  • Problem-based trigger
  • 5 on-line wikis
  • Mixed professional groups
  • Wiki Champions
what is a wiki
What is a wiki?
  • A web site that can be individually or collaboratively edited
  • No special tools and no special IT skills are required.
  • Participants collaboratively work on the content of the site without needing to exchange word processor documents.
  • Gaining rapid acceptance in education (Pereira and Soares, 2007, Long, 2006, Rafaeli, 2006, Fisher and Baird, 2005, Lamb, 2004).
technology used
Technology Used
  • Technologies used:
    • Blackboard VLE
    • Learning Objects “Wiki Tool”
    • University & Remote PCs.
  • Closed System : Log on / off
  • Group wiki access only.
slide9

Step 1

We took some students from different disciplines: radiography (2nd years) & nursing (3rd years)

slide10

Step 2

We put the selected students into a group comprised of the two professions: 25 from nursing & 10 from radiography

GROUP 1: Mary Seacole Inter-disciplinary group

slide11

Step 3

Identification and nomination of wiki champions

A Learning Champion from each of the two professions

Mary Seacole Inter- Disciplinary group

slide12

Step 4

Four additional similar groups were created

slide15

Tutor monitoring of process

Tutor observation of and

Contribution to wiki / student progress

Interaction between student and wiki

complete overview of wiki construction
Complete Overview of wiki construction

Number of page views -

Number of page edits

Number of contributors

Identities of contributors

complete overview of wiki construction1
Complete Overview of wiki construction

Editing history in complete detail

detailed journal of revision history slide 1
Detailed journal of revision history Slide 1
  • Complete Oversight of wiki construction

Editing history in detailing, participant, date of change and version information

detailed journal of revision history slide 2
Detailed journal of revision history Slide 2

A full range of statistics can be drawn from the monitoring tools.

Including

Access time of day Access days of week

detailed journal of revision history slide 3
Detailed journal of revision history Slide 3

A full range of statistics can be drawn from the monitoring tools.

Including

Access time of day Access days of week

findings quantitative
Findings (Quantitative)

Views, edits and contributors

findings qualitative online questionnaire
Findings (Qualitative) Online Questionnaire
  • General Attitude
  • “It’s fun and I really enjoyed it”
  • Shared & Inter-professional learning
  • “is great for interdisciplinary collaboration, sharing of info And most importantly made us more aware of the nurses knowledge”
  • Teamwork
  • “It encourages online teamwork
  • “The concept is a good one but not everyone participated”
findings qualitative online questionnaire1
Findings (Qualitative) Online Questionnaire
  • Student Engagement
  • “Not everyone would feel comfortable putting work on [The Wiki]”
  • “..being able to share information without the pressure of being in a group discussion in uni”
  • Flexibility
  • “It was great to participate from home
  • Outcome & application to other areas
  • “The outcome of the wiki was great, I could see how many would benefit from this”
limitations of study
Limitations of study
  • Number of respondents
  • On-line questionnaire skewing sample
benefits and limitations of wikis
Benefits and limitations of wikis
  • Benefits wikis for teaching and learning
    • Students enjoy it
    • IT skills development
    • Critical peer review and collaboration
    • Resource material
  • Limitations
    • Engaging non participants
    • Technical support
    • Summative assessments
    • Selling benefits of wikis
    • Resources
test drive
Test Drive

Wiki Races

feedback
Feedback
  • Open Mic
contacts
Contacts
  • Denis McGrath
  • d.m.mcgrath@salford.ac.uk
  • Leslie Robinson
  • l.robinson@salford.ac.uk
  • Melanie Stephens
  • m.stephens@salford.ac.uk