1 / 9

Supplementary Table 1

Supplementary Table 1. Supplementary Table 2 The results of screening stage analysis of colorectal cancer .

lalo
Download Presentation

Supplementary Table 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Supplementary Table 1

  2. Supplementary Table 2 The results of screening stage analysis of colorectal cancer SNPs were ranked according to their p Value in the screening stage of colorectal cancer. OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. ||Significance level for the departures from Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (HWE)in the control samples. †OR of minor allele from 2x2 allele frequency table. ‡p Values derived from Cochran-Armitage trend tests. Chromosomal positions are from NCBI build 36.

  3. Supplementary Table 3 The results of screening stage analysis of colon cancer SNPs were ranked according to their p Value in the screening stage of colon cancer. OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. ||Significance level for the departures from Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in the control samples. †OR of minor allele from 2x2 allele frequency table. ‡ p Values derived from Cochran-Armitage trend tests. Chromosomal positions are from NCBI build 36.

  4. Supplementary Table 4 The results of screening stage analysis of proximal colon cancer SNPs were ranked according to their p Value in the screening stage of proximal colon cancer. OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. ||Significance level for the departures from Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in the control samples. †OR of minor allele from 2x2 allele frequency table. ‡ p Values derived from Cochran-Armitage trend tests. Chromosomal positions are from NCBI build 36.

  5. Supplementary Table 5 The results of screening stage analysis of distal colon cancer SNPs were ranked according to their p Value in the screening stage of distal colon cancer. OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. ||Significance level for the departures from Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in the control samples. †OR of minor allele from 2x2 allele frequency table. ‡p Values derived from Cochran-Armitage trend tests. Chromosomal positions are from NCBI build 36.

  6. Supplementary Table 6 The results of screening stage analysis of rectal cancer SNPs were ranked according to their p Value in the screening stage of rectal cancer. OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. ||Significance level for the departures from Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in the control samples. †OR of minor allele from 2x2 allele frequency table. ‡p Values derived from Cochran-Armitage trend tests. Chromosomal positions are from NCBI build 36.

  7. Supplementary Table 7 SNPs mapping to SLC22A3 along with p Value obtained from Cochran-Armitage trend tests OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. †OR of minor allele from 2x2 allele frequency table. ‡p Values derived from Cochran-Armitage trend tests. Chromosomal positions are from NCBI build 36.

  8. Supplementary Table 8 The results of previously reported loci in screening stage OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. †OR of minor allele from 2x2 allele frequency table. ‡p Values derived from Cochran-Armitage trend tests. || Minor allele frequency of control samples in the screening stage.¶ Minor allele frequency of healthy control samples in the screening stage. Chromosomal positions are from NCBI build 36. Supplementary Table 9 List of primers used for SNP discovery List of optimal primer sequences as designed with Primer3.

  9. Supplementary Table 10 Results of replication studies and meta-analysis for colon cancerin Japanese OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. † OR of minor allele from 2 x 2 allele frequency table. ‡ p Values derived from Cochran-Armitage trend tests. § Result of Breslow-Day test. || Meta-analysis of all three studies. Odds ratio and p Values for independence test were calculated by Mantel-Haenzel method. Supplementary Table 11 Results of replication studies and meta-analysis for colorectal cancer in Japanese OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. † OR of minor allele from 2 x 2 allele frequency table. ‡ p Values derived from Cochran-Armitage trend tests. § Result of Breslow-Day test. || Meta-analysis of all three studies. Odds ratio and p Values for independence test were calculated by Mantel-Haenzel method.

More Related