1 / 20

Chicago Area Nursing Staff Development Membership 2011 Survey Results

Chicago Area Nursing Staff Development Membership 2011 Survey Results. Response Rate 30%. Survey was e-mailed to 64 members 19 Members responded. Number of meetings respondents report attending in the last 2 years.

kosey
Download Presentation

Chicago Area Nursing Staff Development Membership 2011 Survey Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chicago Area Nursing Staff Development Membership 2011 Survey Results

  2. Response Rate 30% • Survey was e-mailed to 64 members • 19 Members responded

  3. Number of meetings respondents report attending in the last 2 years • 47 % have attended 0-4 meetings in the last 2 years (less than ½ meetings possible) • 53% have attended 6-10 meetings (at least ½ of the meetings possible)

  4. Briefly describe your health care setting and areas of responsibility. • Settings: • 15 (79%) acute care settings • 5 (26%) academic medical centers • 2 community hospitals • 1 rehab hospital • 1 hospice setting • 1 college of nursing • 2 suburban settings • 1 rural setting

  5. Briefly describe your health care setting and areas of responsibility. • Responsibilities: • 13 (68%) have hospital wide responsibilities • 3 (16%) unit based or population based educators • 6 (32%) responsible for orientation • 4 (21%) coordinate students in their facility • 3 e-learning/LMS • 2 INA Nurse Planners • 1 assists with quality • 2 leadership development

  6. Years in Role • Majority with less than 6 years experience • 37% up to 3 yrs • 32% with 4-6 yrs • 21% with 7-10 yrs • 10% with 16 to > 20 yrs

  7. Do you currently hold certification in Nursing Professional Development? • YES • 10 respondents (53%) • NO, but planning to • 8 respondents (42%) • No, no plans to • 1 respondent

  8. Other Certifications • Certified Hospice Palliative Nurse • Maternal Newborn Nursing • CHPN Pediatric Clinical Nurse Specialist • CNS • ANCC - Nurse Executive • BLS Instructor

  9. Who do we work with? • 100 % of respondents work with RNs • 95% of respondents work with PCTs • 74% of respondents work with nursing students • 42% of respondents work with APRNs • Additionally: MDs, SW, EMTs, USs, RTs & Chaplains

  10. How are We Educated? • Highest Nursing Degrees: • 68% Masters • 21% Baccalaureate • 12% Doctorate

  11. National Nursing Staff Development Organization Membership 90% of respondents are NNSDO members • 5 respondents members for up to 2 yrs • 6 respondents members for 3-5 yrs • 5 respondents for 10 years • 1 respondent for 15 yrs

  12. How many times did we attend NNSDO National Conference? • Majority, 8 (42%)have never attended • 4 (21%) have attended 3-5 times • 4 (21%) have attended twice

  13. What are we interested in learning about? • Most • Evaluation methods & ROI • Technology & staff development • Teaching/Learning methods • Instructional Design, Program Managment & Scope & Standards all equal • Least • Teaching/Learning methods

  14. What else do we want to learn? • Scope and Standards have just been revised >Higher levels of evaluation, but how to make them practical & achievable • Learning Needs assessment: what works, what does not work? • Healthy work environments, Care coordination/care management, Engaging staff in quality improvement, Human factors in patient safety

  15. Activities to consider for future development

  16. Interest in the following for meetings and sharing of information among members:

  17. 94% of Respondents have visited website • They liked most: • Attractive , engaging &easy to use • Great about sharing upcoming meeting information and info on NNSDO • On NNSDO's website-central location for all chapters • Since so much communication is done via e-mail, I don't feel the need to visit the website. • That we even have one, learning about the history of CANSDO and what is going on • Recommendations: • Perhaps a bit more aesthetically pleasing • Title and date of meetings-driving directions • It would be helpful to have member profiles and contact information • We need a way to communicate with members outside of meeting attendance

  18. Location of Meeting • 84% of respondents would prefer to keep the meetings rotating between the city & the suburbs • Two respondents suggested the use of remote learning technologies so they/others can attend

  19. Members like our meetings! • They told us to continue: • The format is good....light dinner followed by CNE act program and then business. • Discussion among the members. • Presentations with contact hours. • Business meeting

  20. Suggestions for meetings • Wear name tags • Structure more sharing during dinner; more sharing in general (stated a couple of different ways) • Adjust dues so members pay less for dinner • Brief discussion regarding healthcare/workforce trends we should be planning for • Journal discussions

More Related