1 / 30

Appliance Operation for the Severely Disabled

Appliance Operation for the Severely Disabled. James Miller Tameem Mohsin ECE 345, Spring 2003. Overview of Presentation. Abstract Introduction Design procedure Design details Design verification Cost Conclusions. Abstract.

julie
Download Presentation

Appliance Operation for the Severely Disabled

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Appliance Operation for the Severely Disabled James Miller Tameem Mohsin ECE 345, Spring 2003

  2. Overview of Presentation • Abstract • Introduction • Design procedure • Design details • Design verification • Cost • Conclusions

  3. Abstract • Goal: create an instrument that will allow severely disabled people to operate household appliances. • Instrument must be able to operate wirelessly. • Instrument must be “stand alone.” • Instrument must use biopotentials as source of electrical signal.

  4. Our Vision

  5. Introduction • A single motor unit has an amplitude of 100 micro-volts. The biopotential signal must be amplified. • A transmitter circuit must analyze the source of the amplified biopotential signal. • The biopotential signal must be wirelessly sent to the receiving circuit. • The receiving instrument must determine the source of the signal and determine whether to turn on or turn off the respective instrument.

  6. Design Procedure • Acquire biopotentials. • EMG amplifier circuit. • Transmittal board. • RF. • Reception board. • LEDs representing appliances.

  7. Design Procedure 1: Acquiring Biopotentials • Biology of an EMG signal. • Positioning the electrodes. • V+, V-, GND. • Small versus large displacement. • Size of the electrodes. • Alligator clips. • BNC connectors. • Reducing noise.

  8. Design Procedure 2: EMG Amplifier Circuit • Differential Amplifier. • Bandpass Filter. • Inverting Amplifier. • Rectifier.

  9. Stage A: 10 M-ohm and 2.2 M-ohm. Stage B: 100 k-ohm, 1 k-ohm. Stage A gain: 10.0. Stage B gain: 100. Theoretical Gain: 1,000. Actual Gain: About 800. Design Procedure 2a: Differential Amplifier

  10. Design Procedure 2b: Bandpass Filter • Desired frequency cutoffs: under 60 Hz and over 300 Hz. • Achieved 78 Hz and 256 Hz. • Reasons for cuttoffs. • 60 Hz noise. • Artifact motion noise. • EMG frequency response is between 5-300 Hz.

  11. Differential Amplifier 2c: Inverting Amplifier • 2 k-ohm and 1k-ohm resistors used. • Vo/Vi=(-Rf)/(Ri) • Kept the gain small to avoid “clipping.” • Inverting amplifier used to for increased bandwidth and lower output impedence.

  12. Differential Amplifier 2d: Rectifier Used the same resistor values as inverting amplifier. Positively corrects all voltage values.

  13. Design Procedure 3: Transmittal Board • 555 Timer #1 • Counter #1 • MUX • RF Transmitter

  14. Design Procedure 3a: 555 Timer #1 • C = 0.1 mF Ra = 5 MW Rb = 5 MW • Theoretical Values: T = 1 sec f = 1 Hz duty cycle = 66.7% • Calculated Values: T = 1.17 sec f = 854.7mHz duty cycle = 66.7% • % error = 14.5%

  15. Design Procedure 3b: Counter #1 • Counts from 0 to 3 and then resets • Output used to select biopotential and frequency • Measured Values: Qa: T = 2.32 sec f = 431.13 mHz duty cycle = 50% Vp = 4.187 V Qb: T = 4.65 sec f = 215.05 mHz duty cycle = 50% Vp = 4.125 V

  16. Design Procedure 3c: MUX • Inputs - 4 EMG circuits • Counter cycles through the 4 signals • Output goes to RF Transmitter

  17. Design Procedure 3d: RF Transmitter • HP Series-II RF Transmitter • Counter selects operating frequency • Each signal has a different frequency • Frequencies corresponding to signals: EMG CKT #1 903.37 MHz EMG CKT #2 907.87 MHz EMG CKT #3 912.37 MHz EMG CKT #4 919.87 MHz

  18. Design Procedure 4:Receiver Board • 555 Timer #2 • Counter #2 • RF Receiver • DMUX • D Flip-Flops • LEDs

  19. Design Procedure 4a: 555 Timer #2 • C = 0.1 mF Ra = 820 kW Rb = 820 kW • Theoretical Values: T = 164 ms f = 6.09 Hz duty cycle = 66.67% • Calculated Values: T = 197 ms f = 5.07 Hz duty cycle = 66.5% • % error = 16.75%

  20. Design Procedure 4b: Counter #2 • Counts from 0 to 3 and resets (same as counter #1) • Used to select frequency of receiver • Used as select bits of DMUX • Calculated Values: Qa: T = 391 ms f = 2.558 Hz duty cycle = 50% Qb: T = 784 ms f = 1.275 Hz duty cycle = 50%

  21. Design Procedure 4c: RF Receiver • Operates at same frequencies as transmitter • Needed way to determine origin of signal • All 4 frequencies scanned before frequency of transmitter is changed • If signal, then right frequency and know origin of signal • Output then goes into DMUX

  22. Design Procedure 4d: DMUX • Line is selected by Counter #2 • Same select bits as receiver • Output will go to device specified by the frequency

  23. Design Procedure 4e: D Flip-Flops • If value incoming signal is logic 1, then toggle output • Use XOR gates • Counter used to clock flip-flops • Output goes to LEDs representing devices

  24. Design Details:Components • Components • LM741 Op-Amps. • Electrodes and Electrolyte Gel. • Chips used. • RF information. • Diodes.

  25. Design Details:Diagrams • Layout of the LM741. • Printed Circuit Board. • Overall EMG Circuit. • Overall RF Circuit. • Transmitter Circuit. • Receiver Circuit.

  26. Design Verification: Testing • Differential op-amp inputs and outputs. • Rectified signal. • Ability to see EMG waveform as a function of muscle contraction. • LEDs responded to specific EMG outputs.

  27. Output of Differential Amplifier vs. Input

  28. Design Verification: Conclusions • Noise is a major problem in all aspects. • Timing issues are a problem. • The ability for the RF to function. • False positives and negatives.

  29. Cost • Parts: electrodes, PCB, RF. • Labor intensive. • Burning breadboards. • Physical setup. • Cost of repair and replacement.

  30. Conclusions • Project is a realistic idea. • Future enhancements: boot strap power, noise reduction on electrodes, RF, Holtek encoders and decoders. • The main problems: • Electrode noise and attachment. • RF. • Timing issues resulting in false positives and negatives.

More Related