1 / 12

Best Practices for Dealing with Non-Controlling Shareholders An Institutional Investor’s Perspective

Best Practices for Dealing with Non-Controlling Shareholders An Institutional Investor’s Perspective. Delhi, 16 th February 2006. Christian Strenger *. OECD Policy Dialogue – Corporate Governance in India. * Chairman, International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN)

jariah
Download Presentation

Best Practices for Dealing with Non-Controlling Shareholders An Institutional Investor’s Perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Best Practices for Dealing with Non-Controlling ShareholdersAn Institutional Investor’s Perspective Delhi, 16th February 2006 Christian Strenger* OECD Policy Dialogue – Corporate Governance in India * Chairman, International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN) Member of the ‘German Government Commission on Corporate Governance’ Member of the Supervisory Board, DWS Investment GmbH, Frankfurt

  2. Profile: DWS Investments • EUR 110 bn fund assets for more than 4 million clients • No. 1 mutual fund company in Germany • Leading across Europe, within the top 10 globally* • More than 500 funds • Ranked “Best Mutual Fund Company“ in Germany by S&P 11 consecutive years • Expertise in all capital markets • Superior performance and track record in innovation • Strong presence in Asia Pacific: EUR 4.7 bn (of which India 613 mn) *) by AuM

  3. I.The value proposition and main ingredients of good corporate governance • Empirical studies confirm the value relevance of good corporate governance • Harvard Law School: disregard of shareholder right causes lower firm valuation and is associated with 7.4% p.a. negative abnormal returns during the 1990 – 2003 period • Deutsche Bank Research: a portfolio of European companies with improving governance standards outperformed a portfolio of deteriorating companies by 4.4 % per annum • Governance-focused Hermes UK Focus Fund outperformed its benchmark by an average 4.8 % each year from 1999 through 2004 • CLSA Governance Scoring (including India) confirms higher stock markets valuation of firms with better governance practices

  4. I.The value proposition and main ingredients of good corporate governance (cont‘d) • Establishment of good governance not only important for companies but also for institutional shareholders in the face of increasing competition • India – a long term winner through better corporate governance • Transparency, independence and absence of conflicts of interest are the main ingredients of good governance

  5. II. Key prerequisites for success with non-controlling shareholders (1/4) Transparency standards in line with international requirements • Comprehensive disclosure of all relevant financial and non-financial information • High compliance with international accounting standards (IFRS) • Timely disclosure of share-dealings by insiders and controlling shareholders • Low disclosure thresholds for share positions • Clarity and comprehensiveness of the information • Equal distribution of information to all shareholders

  6. II. Key prerequisites for success with non-controlling shareholders (2/4) 2) Convincing independence and quality of boards and auditors • Sufficiently independent non-executive directors with high qualifications • Board committees with at least a majority of independent members • Particular relevance for listed state-controlled companies • Sufficient auditor independence and high work quality

  7. II. Key prerequisites for success with non-controlling shareholders (3/4) 3) Equitable treatment of shareholders • Super- and non-voting shares a deterrent to investors (one share – one vote principle a must) • Enable unrestricted cross-border voting and eliminate other voting barriers by electronic and legal means • Shareholder access to all relevant financial and non-financial information • Holders of depository receipts to enjoy the same voting rights • Fair treatment in merger transactions

  8. II. Key prerequisites for success with non-controlling shareholders (4/4) 4) Satisfactory control and enforcement of good governance through independent regulators and other bodies • Effective enforcement essential • Sanction mechanisms must bite • Efficient protection against insider-trading and abusive self-dealing • Centralise competencies in one market supervisory authority • Independent arbitration panel for market-related solutions

  9. III. Institutional investors have a fiduciary duty to act convincingly in the interest of their clients • Convincing external governance actions a must • Internal responsibilities as important prerequisites • Institutional investors must be exemplary in comprehensive and educated exercise of voting rights • Development and disclosure of comprehensive corporate governance and voting policies encouraged by the regulators • Pursuit of critical, yet constructive dialogue with companies • Compliance with high standards of transparency • Sufficient independence of the supervisory body • Clear separation of functions • Process to manage potential conflicts of interest should be explained • Disclosure of the internal governance policy • ICGN Statement on Shareholders Responsibilities as guidance

  10. IV. A good governance framework is essential but only sufficient quality convinces institutions to be long-term shareholders • Better governance quality cannot be achieved by prescription of good laws and proper enforcement only • International guidelines and regulations a good basis for better governance practices (OECD, World Bank, and the ICGN) • Vital to use practical tools (rating and scoring systems) to achieve better understanding and implementation of good governance • Both the companies and their shareholders have to play their active part • Company executives and their supervisory directors must accept that an active pursuit of good governance is paramount for longer-term success • Investors must play their part by an active engagement with the companies they invest in

  11. IV. A good governance framework is essential but only sufficient quality convinces institutions to be long-term shareholders The motivation to pursue good, even better corporate governance is simply the self-interest of all concerned: outperformance for the investors, better financing for the companies and more efficient systems for the countries and their governments

  12. Best Practices for Dealing with Non-Controlling ShareholdersAn Institutional Investor’s Perspective Delhi, 16th February 2006 Christian Strenger* OECD Policy Dialogue – Corporate Governance in India * Chairman, International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN) Member of the ‘German Government Commission on Corporate Governance’ Member of the Supervisory Board, DWS Investment GmbH, Frankfurt

More Related