1 / 40

Lynx-Hare Cycle Assumptions

This article examines the Lynx-Hare cycle and the concept of optimal foraging in predator-prey interactions. Topics include assumptions, variations in interactions, refugia, and the impact of predators and food quality on population cycles.

janets
Download Presentation

Lynx-Hare Cycle Assumptions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lynx-Hare Cycle Assumptions • N1 and N2 dependent only on each other • predator can find and consume prey at any prey density • no Allee effect for predator or prey at low densities

  2. Variations in predator – prey interactions could be due to: --how well predators can find and consume prey --how well prey can avoid predation --whether or not a refugium exists where prey can be safe from predators

  3. Refugium may exist: place for prey to survive without presence of predator e.g., prickly pear cactus introduced to Australia In 1830s for hedge rows, gardens Also resisted drought and had no predators, so spread rapidly and became a nuisance species Cactus moth introduced in 1926, quickly spread and helped control cactus Cactus still present in refugia and expand from them until moth population resurges

  4. jaeger Snowy owl Short-eared owl

  5. Numerical Response Response of predatory birds to different densities of the brown lemming near Barrow, Alaska 1951 1952 1953 Brown lemming1 to 5 15 to 20 70 to 80 (ind per acre) Pomarine jaegerUncommon, no Breeding pairs 4 Mi2 Breeding pairs breeding 18 Mi2 Snowy owlScarce, no breeding Breeding pairs 0.2 to Breeding pairs 0.2 to 0.5 Mi2 many 0.5 Mi2 few nonbreeders nonbreeders Short-eared owl Absent One record Breeding pairs 3-4 Mi2 Source: Pitelka et al. 1955.

  6. Lynx-Hare Cycle Explained? • Hares still cycle in absence of lynx • Lynx can switch to other prey (e.g., grouse) • hare food cycles in quality and edibility • do predators just track cycles, not cause them?

  7. Charles Krebs: detailed analysis of Lynx-Hare Cycle • Disease and parasites? studied parasite loads in hares for years none caused direct mortality • Quality of Food? measured winter food abundance hares only eat 20-40% of what’s available food addition experiments showed initial growth response, then decline • Predation? marked hares 95% mortality due to predation by lynx, owls, coyotes exclusion showed high survival rate

  8. Why are cycles synchronous across large areas and only in high latitudes? • predators tend to disperse over large areas, e.g., one marked lynx moved 1100 km, owls forage over large areas • more seasonal variations at high latitudes may drive higher oscillations in cycles there • get some cycles at lower latitudes, but not as obvious

  9. Optimal Foraging Theory • developed by MacArthur and Pianka (1966) • predicts minimal foraging effort for maximum energy gain • minimal effort means lowest search and handling time • if food patchy, predators should select best patches, lowest S&H time

  10. Glimcher (2002) Krebs Experiment: Bird Foraging over Conveyor Belt In Krebs' experiment, hungry birds stand over a conveyor belt. An experimenter places mealworm segments of two sizes on the belt in a pseudorandom sequence. The bird faces a serial decision problem; it must decide which segments to eat and which to ignore. The decisions the bird makes are influenced by the mean rates at which both prey types are encountered, the difficulty of capturing and eating the segments, and the relative values of the two different size pieces.

  11. Optimal Foraging in the Wild whelks Northwestern Crow http://www.asnailsodyssey.com

  12. Quiz • What is a stable population cycle between predator and prey and three assumptions that describe it? • Graph and explain Type I, II, and III functional responses of how predators respond to increasing numbers of prey. What is a numerical response? • Graph and explain total response of how predators respond to increasing numbers of prey. When does the prey swamping effect occur? • What do the studies of the Lynx-Hare cycle by Charles Krebs tell us about predator-prey cycles in high latitudes? • What is optimal foraging theory and why do studies show that it is never perfect in nature?

  13. Why the world is green: • Insects and other herbivores controlled by their predators and parasites • Hairston, Slobodkin, and Smith (HSS Model) 2. Not all plants are edible

  14. Nitrogen content of typical plant: Stem 0.002 % Leaf 1-5 % (folivores) Seed 10+ % (granivores) Also, as plant grows from sprout to mature, water and protein content declines Cellulose and lignin increase, need bacteria and protozoa in gut to digest

  15. Plant defenses from herbivory: • 1. Morphological • --thick leaves, thorns, needles • Chemical • --secondary compounds

  16. Secondary Compounds Chemicals produced by plants solely for defense Take considerable energy to produce • 1. Nitrogen compounds • --derived from amino acids • --alkaloids include nicotine, morphine • --mostly toxic, bitter tasting 2. Terpenoids --oils and resins --mostly bitter tasting --includes terpetines, solvents 3. Phenolics --tannins that hinder digestion --used in dyes, tanning, inks

  17. Allelopathy: plants use of secondary compounds for defense against competition from other plants --can affect growth and development of other plants around them Corn plants: use terpenoids to attract a parasitic wasp, lays eggs in caterpillar feeding on plant Ethnobiology: study of anthropology and biology, how humans, past and present, used or use plant and animal resources in their culture

  18. Herbivore response to plants: • 1. Morphological • --teeth, gut • Behavioral • --detoxify secondary compounds

  19. Hindgut fermentation enlarged cecum Foregut fermentation enlarged stomach

  20. Behavioral responses: • 1. Eat clay to detoxify compounds • --primates, parrots • Coprophagy • -- rabbits

  21. A specialized diet on plants is not without costs: • Red tree vole, eats only conifer needles • --high in tannins, thick cellulose • --slow metabolism, growth • Lynx-hare cycle • --browsing by hares stimulates plants • to produce secondary compounds • --food becomes less digestible • --hare numbers decline • --populations cycle without predator

  22. Avoiding Predation • cryptic and warning coloration • Batesian mimicry • Müllerian mimicry

  23. katydid Cryptic coloration walking stick

  24. Biston betularia

  25. Warning coloration

  26. Batesian Mimicry Monarch Viceroy

  27. coral snake king snake Red on yellow, harm a fellow Red on black, friend of jack

  28. Müllerian Batesian

  29. Mimicry in Plants Heliconius butterflies and eggs on Passion flower leaves

  30. Predators can be specialists or generalists

  31. Specialist versus generalist relates to optimal foraging theory as well -- generalist flowers with small nectar rewards usually are common species -- specialist flowers with large nectar rewards usually are rare species -- a specialist predator seeks out rarer plants with large rewards rather than waste time getting small rewards from abundant plants -- ensures pollination of rare plant

  32. Quiz • Why is the world green? Give two main areas of plant defenses to herbivory with examples. • What are secondary compounds and how the three major categories help prevent herbivory? • How have herbivores adapted to their diet in dental and gut morphology? Give examples. • What is Batesian and Müllerian mimicry and give examples of each? • Describe specialist versus generalist predators and how these systems might evolve.

More Related